17 Dec 2025, 10:47 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: 15 Dec 2025, 21:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2084 Post Likes: +2190
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
If not for it being my family and my sisters family, I would agree with you! Actually, sister in laws fam too. I never carry more than 2 or 3 people for work trips. I actually fly solo probably 70% of the time. But the edge case trips matter. For reference- chartering was quoted for a Palm Springs trip at thanksgiving. Den to PSP. 10 person plane was 60k. Doesn’t take too many of those to make those 20% of trips I carry people on really add to the budget. 40hrs of chartering at that rate is way more than I spend flying now! Plus, chartering is more difficult to delay when family you are giving a ride to decides leaving 3 hours later than originally planned makes more sense 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: Yesterday, 09:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/07/11 Posts: 866 Post Likes: +489 Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
|
|
|
At that price I'd just hire a pilot to fly the Piaggio back and forth for a second run to pick up the stragglers!
What's the real world, no wind - with a comfy reserve, range on the Piaggio, and what does the auxiliary tank add? That cabin is tough to beat.
Chip-
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: Yesterday, 15:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/16/22 Posts: 17
Aircraft: CJ3+
|
|
|
I would never advocate an overweight departure, but I have it on good authority that the 3+ still climbs like a dream, and will hit barber pole in cruise, departing with full fuel and all the seats (including belted lav) occupied on very warm summer day. *while the Citation X pilots roll their eyes*
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: Yesterday, 17:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/04/19 Posts: 47 Post Likes: +9
Aircraft: P180 II Evo
|
|
Quote: What's the real world, no wind - with a comfy reserve, range on the Piaggio, and what does the auxiliary tank add? That cabin is tough to beat. Chip- I have the aux tank and would say 1250NM still air is comfy at full speed while 1641 is my record at LRC for 5.5 hrs.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: Yesterday, 17:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7764 Post Likes: +5124 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What's the real world, no wind - with a comfy reserve, range on the Piaggio, In my Avanti I, using 600 lbs as reserve, which is more than an hour of cruise at altitude, ie more than regulatory reserves, I could make 1350 NM. That’s max cruise at FL390. I find 390 to be pretty usable unless it’s much above ISA+10. If you really want to stretch, climbing to FL410 about halfway would get you another 40-50 NM. Gets a little slower that high though so I’d be inclined likely to burn off some fuel before I tried to climb. I have my flight plan profile tweaked to my real world experience - just a little more fuel than the strict book numbers, so this is pretty realistic. Quote: and what does the auxiliary tank add? The aux tank adds 400 lbs of fuel, which would be about another 275-300 nm of no-wind range. Where it’d really pay off would be into westbound headwinds one could consistently make east coast back to west coast with only one fuel stop. But… that fuel tank is only available as an option from the factory in a new Evo, so very few exist (Tomasz is one of the lucky few!).
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: Yesterday, 18:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1680 Post Likes: +1553 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I would never advocate an overweight departure, but I have it on good authority that the 3+ still climbs like a dream, and will hit barber pole in cruise, departing with full fuel and all the seats (including belted lav) occupied on very warm summer day. *while the Citation X pilots roll their eyes* I don’t think the main concern is climb rate. The issue with being overweight is higher loads on the gear and airframe. My Eagle II climbs at 4,000fpm at max gross. So if all I cared about was climb I could probably add a couple thousands pounds over gross. Mike
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: Yesterday, 20:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7764 Post Likes: +5124 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Man must be lost. Thought this was a CJ thread. Haha. I mean, someone asked a question about the Piaggio... Quote: To be honest I have always wanted a p180 but after those numbers not so sure anymore. What range do you need? What do you get with your 501?
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation CJ3+ Posted: Yesterday, 22:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/04/19 Posts: 47 Post Likes: +9
Aircraft: P180 II Evo
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What do you get with your 501? Easy to verify using ForeFlight. Just add another aircraft. It’s free.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|