banner
banner

27 Jun 2025, 06:52 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 2093 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2025, 13:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2019
Post Likes: +2068
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
(the 500,501,550,551,S550,560,560XL) all share the same type rating)

Almost correct.

The 500, 510, 550, 551 S550, 560 have type rating CE-500.

The 560XL has type rating CE-560XL.

Cessna's attempt to make the 560XL "just another 560" failed. So we didn't get the SPE coverage, or the type rating coverage, they wanted. The net result is a lot of model confusion (which got you, too) and that causes some problems for 560 owners like myself when I get charged fees based on the 560XL and not the 560 and have to argue about it.

Mike C.


Always seemed odd you can’t make an excel single pilot. Can’t figure out what is ‘harder’ on it vs an Encore.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2025, 14:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/08/09
Posts: 116
Post Likes: +37
Location: KADS Dallas, Texas
Username Protected wrote:
(the 500,501,550,551,S550,560,560XL) all share the same type rating)

Almost correct.

The 500, 510, 550, 551 S550, 560 have type rating CE-500.

The 560XL has type rating CE-560XL.


Ah, right. Fixed, thanks!

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2025, 15:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4349
Post Likes: +3134
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
thanks guys.

great info.

_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2025, 23:48 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20393
Post Likes: +25579
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Always seemed odd you can’t make an excel single pilot. Can’t figure out what is ‘harder’ on it vs an Encore.

FAA philosophy that the more erect a human can be in the cabin, the more you need two pilots.

On a more serious note, you have to be able to reach all the controls from the left seat and the wider airplane could make that difficult for things like the right side breaker panel.

It may also have to do with left seat visibility of the right wing tip.

None of this explains why a BeechJet can't be single pilot, though.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: Yesterday, 07:59 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 11/07/11
Posts: 823
Post Likes: +467
Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
One of the Cessna sales reps had told me why the XL failed to get SPE and I can't specifically remember what it was, but it had to do with cockpit reach.

also

Username Protected wrote:
The 500, 510, 550, 551 S550, 560 have type rating CE-500.

I think the 510 should be 501.

Chip-


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: Yesterday, 13:48 
Offline

 Profile




Joined: 09/26/24
Posts: 1
Company: Jet Life Aero
Aircraft: Cessna 172, Cit ISP
Username Protected wrote:
What do you guys look for when considering a 501? I’m looking for “lower” airframe & engine time (<8000 TT), at least 700hrs until OH and recent hot sections. Paint and interior are probably lowest priority on my list. Prefer decent avionics (GTN 750 at minimum, prefer 2).

What I feel unsure about is the big items I should be looking at on the maintenance tracker. What are the items you definitely want to see done or the big items that may be coming due soon that I should keep a look out for?


Hey Chase, a few things to consider as a buyer in the current 501 market:
1) Valuations - to find what you're looking for, plan on spending $500k-$725k depending on how much engine time is left, the level of avionics upgrades, and cosmetics.

1a) If you're financing, get with a lender NOW and confirm they're ok with this "vintage" of aircraft that won't be on engine programs.

2) Engines - are you open to engines past TBO with recent fresh hots? That will give you more options. For the most part, as long as the major LLPS (life limited parts) like the Blades, Impellers, HT Disks, Isolator Mounts, have life in them, you're fine.

2a) For extra peace of mind, you can go with an Engine extension program like SkyWay MRO or Sky Aviation Holdings that give you AAIP (alternative airframe inspection programs?) on how to take care of the engines when you go past manufacturer's recommended OH. These programs range from $40kish plus hot sections up to $250k including hot sections.

2b) Watch out for the "recent" Impeller Airworthiness Directive that says you have to inspect the Impeller at your next hot section inspection. If the impellers show signs of cracks you have to replace them which can be $75k+ per engine.

3) Major inspections = Phase 1-4 (as a whole, about $10k-$15k every two years BASE rate) and Phase 5 (about $15k-$20k every three years BASE rate)

3a) Low Utilization Programs - some birds are on BACON or LUMP or other low utilization programs that spread out the Phase inspections. The problem is, to transfer them, it'll cost around $15k, OR if you remove the program, you may need to do a Phase 1-5 inspection immediately if the last Phase 1-5 inspections were done more than the usual calendar time window.

Hope this helps!

Here are a few older videos that may help too:
https://youtu.be/0fsFaIbvBuw?si=AKFuuH9FhZXQUdRq
https://youtu.be/wtWQPo0oy0o?si=8JFm3L1dwMMVGunx


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: Yesterday, 14:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1931
Post Likes: +1576
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
1a) If you're financing, get with a lender NOW and confirm they're ok with this "vintage" of aircraft that won't be on engine programs.

That's a really salient comment.

Currently discussing this with a friend that requires financing and the lender wants engine programs. At that point you might as well get a Williams powered 501 and at least get the fuel savings, range, 430 ceiling, etc.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: Yesterday, 23:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/20
Posts: 1638
Post Likes: +1699
Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
Username Protected wrote:
what AOA does everyone climb at for cruise climb vs max performance climb?

Hi Tom,

Sorry for the delay - summer travel has kept me away from the boards....

Max performance buys you nothing in a stock 501 (math to follow below).

I always use the IAS cruise climb chart that came with my CAE abbreviated checklist except that I start at 200 KIAS and hold that until FL250 and then follow the chart:
Attachment:
CruiseClimb501.png


Cruise climb Time/Fuel/Distance:
10,500 T/O weight to FL370: 29 mins, 591lbs, 139nm

Max climb Time/Fuel/Distance:
10,500 T/O weight to FL370: 20 mins, 440lbs, 69nm
Then add the 9 mins at FL370 at MCT: 124lbs, 52nm

So after 29 mins at max climb you have burned 564lbs and gone 121nm - 18 miles short of the cruise climb. To go that 18 miles you will burn another 41lbs which means that max climb actually uses MORE fuel (605 for max climb vs 591 for cruise climb).


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 2093 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 136, 137, 138, 139, 140



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.AAI.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.