06 May 2025, 14:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 13:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/12 Posts: 687 Post Likes: +504 Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: .8 is pretty good for a p300E. What's fuel burn/range like at that speed?
Someday they will be cheap..... VRB ABI - 3.29 hrs Fuel Burn - 3705lbs ABI - SEZ - 1.87hrs Fuel Burn - 2370 lbs SDL - VRB - 3.68hrs Fuel Burn - 3890lbs All these legs would have been FL400 - FL450. Maybe they'll be cheap someday but its going to be a hot minute until NetJets quits sucking up all the production. https://www.netjets.com/en-us/2021-expanding-our-fleet
Last edited on 12 Oct 2022, 13:05, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 13:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4702 Post Likes: +5297 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Quote: The fastest single pilot capable jet is the Phenom 300E. Here is Mach .8 at FL380 at ISA +1
461 knot TAS……..oh baby! Swearingen SJ30, Mach 0.83. I truly believe that's the fastest aircraft that meets these criteria for the US: Single pilot Civilian Standard airworthiness certificate Interesting note - it has 12 psi pressurization, for an 1,800 ft cabin at FL490.
Last edited on 12 Oct 2022, 13:19, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 13:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/17/15 Posts: 546 Post Likes: +534 Location: KSRQ
Aircraft: C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The old L1011's were fast. We flew them around at .86. The computer would store a couple old flight plans, so you could page through them and see what other crews had been doing. One day a Chief Pilot was out flying and he paged through the computer and saw a flight plan in there at .90. So he called the old Captain in and said "hey why were you going .90?" The reply from the grumpy old Captain was "Because the POS wouldn't go any faster." I've always loved that story! Sorry for the thread creep. Used to work on the L1011 back in the early 90’s. I miss those.
_________________ Tony
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 14:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/30/22 Posts: 2229 Post Likes: +1288 Location: 0W3
Aircraft: Mooney 252/Encore
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Holy crap I never would have thought those things were so slow. I always knew they were heavy subsonic attack jets.. but really cruise is at 280ktas???? Lots of civilian owner flown turboprops will blow the doors off that. I would think they would be sitting ducks for SAMs Engines are optimized for low altitude. We used to operate at 300 knots all the time down low. Fastest I ever saw was a cold day and dis 365 KIAS. You don't defeat SAMs with speed. They are MUCH faster.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 15:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4085 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Quote: The fastest single pilot capable jet is the Phenom 300E. Here is Mach .8 at FL380 at ISA +1
461 knot TAS……..oh baby! Swearingen SJ30, Mach 0.83. I truly believe that's the fastest aircraft that meets these criteria for the US: Single pilot Civilian Standard airworthiness certificate Interesting note - it has 12 psi pressurization, for an 1,800 ft cabin at FL490. Sj30 is an amazing airplane. Got to spend some time at their facility in TX recently with a customer that has one. The build quality is ... Mu2 like... 
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 17:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1053 Post Likes: +546 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Is the SJ30 a real airplane? How many were made or are being made? Looked at their Facebook page and it seems to indicate 8.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 17:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +359 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Apollo 10! >24,000MPH! Cheapest flying possible! (OPM) Single Pil………ah 2/3 ain’t bad. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 17:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/25/12 Posts: 7021 Post Likes: +6209 Location: KCMA - Camarillo, CA
Aircraft: Bonanza G-35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Apollo 10! >24,000MPH! Cheapest flying possible! (OPM) Single Pil………ah 2/3 ain’t bad.  Not a jet! 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 18:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +359 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Apollo 10! >24,000MPH! Cheapest flying possible! (OPM) Single Pil………ah 2/3 ain’t bad.  Not a jet! 
Lmfao. Otherwise all good??
And although I’m no aerospace engineer, don’t rockets technically use a form of jet propulsion?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 18:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/25/12 Posts: 7021 Post Likes: +6209 Location: KCMA - Camarillo, CA
Aircraft: Bonanza G-35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lmfao. Otherwise all good?? And although I’m no aerospace engineer, don’t rockets technically use a form of jet propulsion? No. A rocket only bangs and blows, a jet engine sucks, squeezes, bangs and blows. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 18:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +359 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lmfao. Otherwise all good?? And although I’m no aerospace engineer, don’t rockets technically use a form of jet propulsion? No. A rocket only bangs and blows, a jet engine sucks, squeezes, bangs and blows. 
If the bangs and blows are good I can overlook the sucks and squeezes part…
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 12 Oct 2022, 23:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/21/15 Posts: 105 Post Likes: +83
Aircraft: C182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: …equates to 8.4 statute miles per gallon. In the big SUV territory. Given, to large degree, interstate miles are roughly 22% longer than air miles, one could say equates to 8.4 * 1.22 = 10.2 equivalent road statute miles per gallon. Well, that is how I like to do my version of this calculation. :-) -Bill
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Jets with normal cruise of 0.7 mach or better? Posted: 13 Oct 2022, 09:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/12 Posts: 687 Post Likes: +504 Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
|
|
What is the story on the SJ30? I did a quick google search and looks like they sold or went BK and haven't resumed production. I'm guessing the fleet size isn't anything more than a handful of a/c and service/mx takes quite a bit of planning.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|