02 Nov 2025, 06:06 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 11:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/23/11 Posts: 3590 Post Likes: +2794
Aircraft: 210
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But unless interstellar travel is somehow possible exceeding the speed of light, it almost doesn't matter if there are other planets with life, as we will never meet them and vice versa. Our galaxy is due to collide with the Andromeda galaxy in 5 billion years. The important question remains, if a certain BT'er is alive then, whether he will wave at the inhabitants of another galaxy's planetary system as they fly by.
_________________ Inasmuch as which....ever so much more so.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 12:18 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21880 Post Likes: +22523 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But unless interstellar travel is somehow possible exceeding the speed of light, it almost doesn't matter if there are other planets with life, as we will never meet them and vice versa. It’s important to the experiment to prevent cross contamination.
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 17:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20724 Post Likes: +26150 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But unless interstellar travel is somehow possible exceeding the speed of light, Let's assume this is possible. A piece of rock the size of a grain of sand would destroy your spacecraft at those speeds due to the kinetic energy it would have. Interstellar space is not empty. It is unrealistic to travel through it at high speed. Realistically, humans might be able to settle on a few worlds in our solar system, but going to another star is currently hugely infeasible. It would take 1000s of years. Further, if we find another Earth, a planet with an oxygen atmosphere, that means life already exists on that planet and that life will likely be extremely hostile to our own. I doubt we will get a warm welcome. We are stuck in our solar system. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 18:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/25/10 Posts: 13186 Post Likes: +21108 Company: Summerland Key Airport Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But unless interstellar travel is somehow possible exceeding the speed of light, Let's assume this is possible. A piece of rock the size of a grain of sand would destroy your spacecraft at those speeds due to the kinetic energy it would have.
Presumably, if we are warping spacetime to achieve FTL, we can create shields and/or a DEW CWIS.
Quote: Interstellar space is not empty. It is unrealistic to travel through it at high speed
Similar things were said about breaking the sound barrier..
Quote: Further, if we find another Earth, a planet with an oxygen atmosphere, that means life already exists on that planet and that life will likely be extremely hostile to our own. I doubt we will get a warm welcome.
I don’t think there’s much to necessarily support those assumptions as being a pre-determined conclusion to which we should resign ourselves.
Quote: We are stuck in our solar system.
100 years ago, we were stuck on our own planet.
_________________ Being right too soon is socially unacceptable. — Heinlein
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 18:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/09/14 Posts: 2674 Post Likes: +3613 Location: KOMN
Aircraft: Bonanza V35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 100 years ago, we were stuck on our own planet.
Realistically, "we" still are.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 19:02 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 35704 Post Likes: +14170 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Presumably, if we are warping spacetime to achieve FTL, we can create shields and/or a DEW CWIS. While the two issues (warping spacetime and deflecting high energy particles) are hardly related from a physics perspective, it's not totally unreasonable to expect that both couldn't be solved in similar timeframes (e.g. thousands of years). Quote: Similar things were said about breaking the sound barrier.. When supersonic flight was being contemplated the physics of the issues involved were pretty well known and the engineers/scientists working on the problem already knew it was theoretically possible given their understanding of aeronautics at the time. We also already had supersonic "bodies" in the form of rifle and artillery rounds. The main issue was controlling an aircraft while shockwaves got near the flight control surfaces. IOW supersonic flight was theoretically but not necessarily practically feasible at the time due to technological limitations and this was an engineering problem not a scientific theory issue. The notion of a "sound barrier" really only existed in the minds of "lay people" who didn't understand the physics involved. There's no realistic theory consistent with current knowledge that makes FTL travel (or even motion of inert bodies) theoretically possible let alone practically feasible. That's a big difference.
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 19:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/02/10 Posts: 7694 Post Likes: +5095 Company: Inscrutable Fasteners, LLC Location: West Palm Beach - F45
Aircraft: Planeless
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But unless interstellar travel is somehow possible exceeding the speed of light, Let's assume this is possible. A piece of rock the size of a grain of sand would destroy your spacecraft at those speeds due to the kinetic energy it would have. Interstellar space is not empty. It is unrealistic to travel through it at high speed. Realistically, humans might be able to settle on a few worlds in our solar system, but going to another star is currently hugely infeasible. It would take 1000s of years. Further, if we find another Earth, a planet with an oxygen atmosphere, that means life already exists on that planet and that life will likely be extremely hostile to our own. I doubt we will get a warm welcome. We are stuck in our solar system. Mike C.
If that's the case, then we might as well simply give up, all become shepherds and go back to tending the flocks. At some point, stellar mechanics are going to produce global warming that's going to do more than just melt some ice.
If we're not in it for the long game, we might as well coast to the finish.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 17 Jul 2022, 20:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/06/08 Posts: 5290 Post Likes: +3044
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
|
Unfortunately its very difficult to imagine any form of FTL travel that does not also allow you to create a time machine. That comes directly out of special relativity which has been tested under a huge range of conditions.
Note that wormholes, hyperspace, "going around space" and all those things don't help - if you start at point A and end at point B faster than light could get there (in vacuum) you can use that to build a time machine .
With time machines "causality" goes out the window - effects no longer happen after causes, and it becomes very difficult to imagine how that could make sense.
Obviously "never" is dangerous in science / technology, but FTL is as impossible as any technology that I can think of. It would let you violate all of the basic laws of physics we observe in the universe.
Maybe some day someone will recognize how its possible yet still consistent with what we observe, but its no how I'd bet.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 18 Jul 2022, 18:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3151 Post Likes: +2294 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But unless interstellar travel is somehow possible exceeding the speed of light, Let's assume this is possible. A piece of rock the size of a grain of sand would destroy your spacecraft at those speeds due to the kinetic energy it would have. Interstellar space is not empty. It is unrealistic to travel through it at high speed. Realistically, humans might be able to settle on a few worlds in our solar system, but going to another star is currently hugely infeasible. It would take 1000s of years. Further, if we find another Earth, a planet with an oxygen atmosphere, that means life already exists on that planet and that life will likely be extremely hostile to our own. I doubt we will get a warm welcome. We are stuck in our solar system. Mike C.
When traveling at the speed of light you would be pure energy, so hitting things isn't a concern. Traveling faster would violate the currently known laws of physics, so hitting matter would probably not be at the top of the list there either. Time dilation at near light speeds does occur and would be an issue for societies. Star Trek addresses the sand issue with a "deflector shield". They also make liberal use of "tachyon particles," usually in ways that make no sense.
I am of the belief that there is life in the universe, but it is either so far away we'll never contact them or so brief (on a cosmic scale) we won't overlap with them.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 18 Jul 2022, 20:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 6166 Post Likes: +5495 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
|
So, many of you fellers are way more intelligent than I, so......riddle me this......what about a "generational" starship concept? Forget "stasis", "hypersleep", whatever......why not send people "no return to sender"? Obviously food/water/O2 would be issues to solve, as would "on the fly" repairs to said ship.......but would those not be easier problems to solve than FTL travel?
Curious to hear your thoughts.
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 18 Jul 2022, 20:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3151 Post Likes: +2294 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So, many of you fellers are way more intelligent than I, so......riddle me this......what about a "generational" starship concept? Forget "stasis", "hypersleep", whatever......why not send people "no return to sender"? Obviously food/water/O2 would be issues to solve, as would "on the fly" repairs to said ship.......but would those not be easier problems to solve than FTL travel?
Curious to hear your thoughts. Problem is where do you send them? They could go millions of years and not find anything. Alpha centauri is 4.3 light years away, and it's very unlikely there is anything there of interest to humans. Other issues: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_ship
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 18 Jul 2022, 21:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6410 Post Likes: +5147
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So, many of you fellers are way more intelligent than I, so......riddle me this......what about a "generational" starship concept? Forget "stasis", "hypersleep", whatever......why not send people "no return to sender"? Obviously food/water/O2 would be issues to solve, as would "on the fly" repairs to said ship.......but would those not be easier problems to solve than FTL travel?
Curious to hear your thoughts. Have you ever been to an HOA meeting? That’s representative of what 20-50 ppl who live in proximity of each other behave like Now imagine that combined with some form of prison- I just don’t understand how it would work But we have people on BT that have done tours on ships abroad- maybe they have a longer contribution to the challenges or close quarters confinement for long durations
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 18 Jul 2022, 21:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 6166 Post Likes: +5495 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So, many of you fellers are way more intelligent than I, so......riddle me this......what about a "generational" starship concept? Forget "stasis", "hypersleep", whatever......why not send people "no return to sender"? Obviously food/water/O2 would be issues to solve, as would "on the fly" repairs to said ship.......but would those not be easier problems to solve than FTL travel?
Curious to hear your thoughts. Problem is where do you send them? They could go millions of years and not find anything. Alpha centauri is 4.3 light years away, and it's very unlikely there is anything there of interest to humans. Other issues: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_ship
I knew I should have Googled it before asking....... .........ah, well......there are no stupid questions, right???
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope Posted: 18 Jul 2022, 21:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 6166 Post Likes: +5495 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So, many of you fellers are way more intelligent than I, so......riddle me this......what about a "generational" starship concept? Forget "stasis", "hypersleep", whatever......why not send people "no return to sender"? Obviously food/water/O2 would be issues to solve, as would "on the fly" repairs to said ship.......but would those not be easier problems to solve than FTL travel?
Curious to hear your thoughts. Have you ever been to an HOA meeting? That’s representative of what 20-50 ppl who live in proximity of each other behave like Now imagine that combined with some form of prison- I just don’t understand how it would work But we have people on BT that have done tours on ships abroad- maybe they have a longer contribution to the challenges or close quarters confinement for long durations
LMAO, not only have I been to them, I've presided over them. 8 years as our HOA president......mainly to keep others from making a mockery of the neighborhood. Oddly enough, though, most of the "complaints" I had brought to me had nothing to do with the Covenants! It was shocking how few people had actually read them before purchasing in the subdivision. It was the first thing we asked for before offering on our lot.
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|