10 Nov 2025, 07:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 09:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/05/11 Posts: 5248 Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been making it a point to take note of headwinds at FL450 on ADDS in the last year and rarely is it so different. Ditto on that. Yet the Citation pilots on their board tend to differ on their opinion.
_________________ “ Embrace the Suck”
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 09:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been making it a point to take note of headwinds at FL450 on ADDS in the last year and rarely is it so different. Ditto on that. Yet the Citation pilots on their board tend to differ on their opinion. Yeah I'd be curious to know if what the computer says and what's actually happening are off a lot.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 10:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I second Miko's Dallas departure description. Texoma departure from ADS and I am always kept low, doing 250 IAS at 3k waiting to climb. Not sure where you would land if you lost an engine and were over the meaty part of Dallas though. It's a concrete jungle.
On JPOOL9 out of KDAL, a PC12 is within glide range of an airport at 3000ft all the way down to Midway. From normal cruise speed at 3000ft, a PC12 glides around 10 miles.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 10:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/05/11 Posts: 5248 Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been making it a point to take note of headwinds at FL450 on ADDS in the last year and rarely is it so different. Ditto on that. Yet the Citation pilots on their board tend to differ on their opinion.
Right now from my home base to KICT winds are 59kts at 41K, 58 @45, and 47@49. On fltplan.com. Little time difference or fuel burn in a Lear31.
No doubt 45 will Help getting above more weather.
_________________ “ Embrace the Suck”
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 11:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/16/07 Posts: 19130 Post Likes: +30843 Company: Real Estate development Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
|
|
|
As to Dallas keeping jets low (and turbo props), I had a friend with a TBM at Redbird south of Dallas. When he came in from the north, they would bring him down to 3 to 4,000 well north near where the B started all the way down on the arrival. At Operation Rain Check he asked about it and they explained how all the jet arrivals came in and how they had to keep him under them. Usually, coming into Fort Worth from the north in the Citation II and V, they would bring us down to 4 or 5,000 30 miles north. Really put us in the bumps and burned the fuel down there.
_________________ Dave Siciliano, ATP
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 11:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As to Dallas keeping jets low (and turbo props), I had a friend with a TBM at Redbird south of Dallas. When he came in from the north, they would bring him down to 3 to 4,000 well north near where the B started all the way down on the arrival. At Operation Rain Check he asked about it and they explained how all the jet arrivals came in and how they had to keep him under them. Usually, coming into Fort Worth from the north in the Citation II and V, they would bring us down to 4 or 5,000 30 miles north. Really put us in the bumps and burned the fuel down there. Coming into Atlanta on the arrival, all planes are at 3K' for waaaay too long before turning to final. The speed limit below Class B is 200 anyways. They have us lined up when it's IFR. VFR I'm at 5500' in the same airspace.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 15:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been making it a point to take note of headwinds at FL450 on ADDS in the last year and rarely is it so different. Depends on the height of the tropopause. Jetstream is high right now. This is winds today. Attachment: 2018-11-05_1431.png Even today you have 4kts less headwind but more important ISA is -7 to -9 less which will give you greater speed up to MMO. So you have 3 things that will improve range going from FL410 to FL450 even today - Higher TAs with less fuel burn, lower headwind, and lower ISA giving more engine power. It adds up to be significant.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 16:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/05/11 Posts: 5248 Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been making it a point to take note of headwinds at FL450 on ADDS in the last year and rarely is it so different. Depends on the height of the tropopause. Jetstream is high right now. This is winds today. Attachment: 2018-11-05_1431.png Even today you have 4kts less headwind but more important ISA is -7 to -9 less which will give you greater speed up to MMO. So you have 3 things that will improve range going from FL410 to FL450 even today - Higher TAs with less fuel burn, lower headwind, and lower ISA giving more engine power. It adds up to be significant.
Good point on the ISA differences
_________________ “ Embrace the Suck”
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 19:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2060 Post Likes: +2136
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Connecticut to Ft. Lauderdale isn't "west bound in winter".
Right now headwinds West bound ATL to ASE are -67@FL450 and -59@FL260 and -36@16,500'
I'd do the whole thing at 16,500' VFR in 5 hours.. CJ3 could do it at FL400 in 3:35 non stop. What’s your fuel burn and TAS at 16.5? I have yet to find a day with big wind where it was significantly lighter at 16 to warrant flying there vs the 20s. I take a pretty good fuel hit for being there. Speed is virtually unchanged from 280. I know they exist, I just always see 100kts at 28 and 80kts at 16.5
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 19:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/11 Posts: 66 Post Likes: +70
Aircraft: M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have yet to find a day with big wind where it was significantly lighter at 16 to warrant flying there vs the 20s. I take a pretty good fuel hit for being there. Speed is virtually unchanged from 280. I know they exist, I just always see 100kts at 28 and 80kts at 16.5
I'll let you know tomorrow. I'm flying from Salt Lake City to Portland. 87 knot headwind forecast at FL260. 37 knots at 16,000. TAS for me at FL260 is 262 and I can easily do 240 at 16,000. I'm guessing the difference in fuel burn will be 6-7 gallons an hour but it's 45 minutes faster so it should be less fuel total. This in an M600.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 19:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Connecticut to Ft. Lauderdale isn't "west bound in winter".
Right now headwinds West bound ATL to ASE are -67@FL450 and -59@FL260 and -36@16,500'
I'd do the whole thing at 16,500' VFR in 5 hours.. CJ3 could do it at FL400 in 3:35 non stop. What’s your fuel burn and TAS at 16.5? I have yet to find a day with big wind where it was significantly lighter at 16 to warrant flying there vs the 20s. I take a pretty good fuel hit for being there. Speed is virtually unchanged from 280. I know they exist, I just always see 100kts at 28 and 80kts at 16.5
Sometimes it's just what you get. Today KADS to KPWA they stopped me at 16k where I had 65 knots on the nose burning 71.5 GPH. After, of course, being kept at 5 then 6k until completely clear of the bravo. It's a short trip so no big deal. Except today we had a lot of moderate down low.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet? Posted: 05 Nov 2018, 19:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2060 Post Likes: +2136
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'll let you know tomorrow. I'm flying from Salt Lake City to Portland. 87 knot headwind forecast at FL260. 37 knots at 16,000. TAS for me at FL260 is 262 and I can easily do 240 at 16,000. I'm guessing the difference in fuel burn will be 6-7 gallons an hour but it's 45 minutes faster so it should be less fuel total. This in an M600.
An M600 won't do faster than 262 at FL260? What's the limiting factor? A reason to get a 400knot jet is to literally never fly piston engine ground speeds again. The fuels burns of the turbine seem really high when you are only going to 190kts over the ground. I don't care if it is only saving a few minutes, I feel much better about the costs involved the higher the groundspeed number.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|