banner
banner

05 Feb 2026, 05:56 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2017, 13:10 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:

The thing I worry about is reverse heat flow in the engine after shutdown due to the canting. That is very atypical of jet engine installs. With the turbine section being hot, the air with flow backwards through the engine exposing the front section of the engine to heat is never experiences. I bet there will be strict admonishments about parking tail into the wind after shutdown due in part to this.


I might be more concerned about oil pooling in some bearings with the engine cant. I heard the Premier FJ44 has some bearing issues due to its mounting compared to Citations.

About 6 months ago I saw the FJ33 running on the Williams test stand. I didn't think about it at the time but it was mounted horizontally and not canted the way it will be in the SF50. I hope someone has done some long run reliability testing of the engine mounted that way.

Quote:
Something that could be VERY bad would be an aborted wet start for whatever reason. Could have fuel draining out the back of the engine on fire. That will probably not end well.


It will happen if a new turbojet pilot ignores the tailwind start limits. Some CJ4s burnt up their tails that way.

Attachment:
IMG_0103.JPG


Attachment:
IMG_0104.JPG


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2017, 14:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13720
Post Likes: +7901
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Can't you just push a button with a FADEC start?

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2017, 15:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16157
Post Likes: +8880
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Can't you just push a button with a FADEC start?


And how often does a FADEC engine have a hung start ?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2017, 16:50 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Can't you just push a button with a FADEC start?


You press the START button, take throttle over idle cutoff, and then monitor the start. Current Williams FADEC provides no protections until the engine is running. Pilot needs to recognize a hung start or hot start and take the appropriate actions.

Hung start or hot start in a FJ44 can come from a tail or cross wind, low battery or GPU, failed igniter, cowl plug left in engine, N1 rotor locked up due to ice.

Should not happen often but if it does the wrong actions can be costly.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2017, 18:24 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21255
Post Likes: +26781
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Can't you just push a button with a FADEC start?

The pilot is still responsible (both operationally and financially) for the start. The Williams engine program excludes hot starts from coverage.

I wonder if the FADEC logs engine parameters during start? In that case, the FADEC not only didn't prevent the hot start, it may provide the evidence that proves you have to pay for it.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2017, 18:47 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Can't you just push a button with a FADEC start?

The pilot is still responsible (both operationally and financially) for the start. The Williams engine program excludes hot starts from coverage.

I wonder if the FADEC logs engine parameters during start? In that case, the FADEC not only didn't prevent the hot start, it may provide the evidence that proves you have to pay for it.

Mike C.


Yes, the FADEC logs start temps and is a snitch on temp exceedences. Pulling and reviewing the FADEC data should be part of any prepurchase review.
_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2017, 18:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/12
Posts: 2961
Post Likes: +2932
Company: Retired
Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Any word yet on the maintenance program? Most of the competitors were originally aimed at corporate use and have high-dollar calendar based maintenance items that maybe aren't so bad with 600 hour/year corporate usage (and an accounting department writing deductible business expense checks) but for a 100 hour/year owner they send the per-hour cost over the top. Since they call it a "personal jet", I'm curious to see how Cirrus has handled this.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2017, 19:17 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21255
Post Likes: +26781
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I'm curious to see how Cirrus has handled this.

With silence.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2017, 19:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
but for a 100 hour/year owner they send the per-hour cost over the top. Since they call it a "personal jet", I'm curious to see how Cirrus has handled this.

1. Why are you assuming 100 hours per year?

2. The guy buying an SF50 to use it only 100 hours a year probably doesn't care what the hourly costs are.

My buddy runs a charter business with a fleet of SR22's. He has SF50's on order. I don't think the SF50 will be ONLY a "personal jet".

I'm sure if you call Cirrus and inquire about buying one they'll give you the MX schedule.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2017, 20:26 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8740
Post Likes: +9491
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
I'm curious to see how Cirrus has handled this.

With silence.

Mike C.


Uh, no.

I don't think it's much of a mystery about Cirrus' maintenance and engine programs. They have published an Owner's Guide which includes the maintenance programs. I don't know when they first published it, or if its been updated but the provided me a copy in January of last year. So it's been out quite a while and available to prospects (I'm not a prospect).

They call their program Jetstream and there are three levels. Their idea is to package up about everything you need to fly the plane except fuel into one basic price. To get engine coverage you have to elect Jetstream Plus or Premium.

The Premium package includes a lot of stuff including recurrent training, scheduled and unscheduled airframe maintenance including parts and labor, engine program Williams Tap Blue), electronic aircraft logbooks and maintenance records, scheduled and unscheduled avionics maintenance including parts and labor, mobile response unit access, normal wear item replacement, recommended service bulletins, CAPS overhaul at 10 years and electronic charts and database updates. 2 years or 400 hours prepaid $139,900. 3 years or 600 hours $209,900 or 3 years 1000 total hours 309,900. Or pay as you go $375/hour. The Plus program leaves a bunch of stuff off for not much savings.

You also get a tip to tail warranty (which on my SR22T mean everything) for 2 years and you can buy a 3rd year for $49,900.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2017, 23:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/26/11
Posts: 483
Post Likes: +289
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Username Protected wrote:
.

It really is beneficial that most jet engines are hung on pylons away from the main aircraft. Embedded (or in this case piggyback) engine locations have issues.

Mike C.


I didn't think about that until now but could be a major problem. Normal engines are designed to burn through the pylon and fall off if they are on fire in flight so they don't reach the airframe. Obviously, that wouldn't work on this airplane. It would be burning right into the fuselage.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 24 Feb 2017, 23:59 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/05/11
Posts: 10429
Post Likes: +7502
Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation
Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
Username Protected wrote:
Normal engines are designed to burn through the pylon and fall off if they are on fire in flight so they don't reach the airframe.


Really? That is one of the purposes of pylons? I had no idea.

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 25 Feb 2017, 00:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/01/14
Posts: 2302
Post Likes: +2094
Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
Yup


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 25 Feb 2017, 00:03 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/26/11
Posts: 483
Post Likes: +289
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Username Protected wrote:
Normal engines are designed to burn through the pylon and fall off if they are on fire in flight so they don't reach the airframe.


Really? That is one of the purposes of pylons? I had no idea.


So I have been told at recurrent before. I'm not sure how many times this has actually come into play, but I know its been part of the engineers designs.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 25 Feb 2017, 00:17 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21255
Post Likes: +26781
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
They have published an Owner's Guide which includes the maintenance programs.

I have asked their sales guy many times for this info and he seems unaware such a guide exists. I begin to suspect it predates the relaunch and isn't part of their promotional materials presently, but I've never seen this guide.

Does it have a date on it?

Quote:
2 years or 400 hours prepaid $139,900. 3 years or 600 hours $209,900 or 3 years 1000 total hours 309,900.

You also get a tip to tail warranty (which on my SR22T mean everything) for 2 years and you can buy a 3rd year for $49,900.

So I buy an SF50 and I buy the 3 year package and the 3rd year extended warranty.

Let's say I fly 150 hours/year, 450 total hours, which would be about what I am likely to do if I owned an SF50.

I spent $259,800 for 450 hours, $577/hour.

On a brand new, nothing about to wear out aircraft?

Are you kidding me?

Also, if I don't buy any of that, I still get the 2 year warranty that covers "everything". So why do I buy the airframe program the first two years?

Given the 3rd year of warranty costs money above and beyond the maintenance program, that implies the program does NOT cover all the costs, otherwise why buy a warranty if you are covered by the program. So something there doesn't compute.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259 ... 512  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.