29 Jan 2026, 17:50 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 08:47 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6065 Post Likes: +719 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Im sure you never fill your tanks everytime you land at PDK. Thats what you need to do with these shares. I like to buy fuel pretty much at all airport were I land but rarely fill it unless a long trip and I need full range. Username Protected wrote: The point I don't get is filling full fuel all the time when you bring it back. What do you do when you want to bring a full cabin of passenger 1-2 hrs away and the plane as full fuel? Then you pay ramp fees because you don't want to takeoff heavy again at destination? I fuel my plane when I know where im going and what payload I have.
When does any of this happen?
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 08:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thats what you need to do with these shares.
That's not true at all. AscensionAir (the program I posted) does everything for you. It's not a rental program. Staff is there when you load up and is there to greet you when you land. You do nothing but fly.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 12:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/22/09 Posts: 5643 Post Likes: +1121 Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Aircraft: 1977 A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But there will always be the day when you want the plane to be somewhere and someone else booked it. For that annoyance you just paid $525K...  Adam, I think you have that backwards. You saved $500k by having the inconvenience or you are flying equipment you could not afford or you have access to two different birds (for different missions). Of course, the amount of hours flown by each of the three partners would be important. You would not want three peeps all flying 500 hours a year. However, for people who only use their cross country plane 3-4 times a month, it might work out and allow them to be flying a jet. 
_________________ It is possible to fly without motors, but not without knowledge and skill.WW
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 14:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6065 Post Likes: +719 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
The only beef I have is the plane is left full of fuel every time you fly that's not something you want in a jet or any turboprop. Username Protected wrote: Thats what you need to do with these shares.
That's not true at all. AscensionAir (the program I posted) does everything for you. It's not a rental program. Staff is there when you load up and is there to greet you when you land. You do nothing but fly.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 14:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The only beef I have is the plane is left full of fuel every time you fly that's not something you want in a jet or any turboprop.
Once again..... That's not true at all. What are you talking about? Are you reading what I';m writing?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 14:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 17171 Post Likes: +29263 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The only beef I have is the plane is left full of fuel every time you fly that's not something you want in a jet or any turboprop. or anything bigger than a quicksilver
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 14:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The only beef I have is the plane is left full of fuel every time you fly that's not something you want in a jet or any turboprop.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 15:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12206 Post Likes: +3089 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The only beef I have is the plane is left full of fuel every time you fly that's not something you want in a jet or any turboprop.
I have only seen this done for training aircraft or at owner specifications. Who else does it? Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 17:51 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3835 Post Likes: +5701 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: However, for people who only use their cross country plane 3-4 times a month, it might work out and allow them to be flying a jet.  I would have to say that I am not sure someone flying 3-4 times a month should really be flying a flight level plane in a most weather mission. Flying the plane is not hard, but learning to handle the curve balls thrown by mother nature and ATC requires more time in the saddle IMHO. Maybe if you are an experienced cross country high altitude flyer and moving into an SF50, that works. But most of these position holders are new to pressurization, new to turbine, new to jets, new to flight level flying, new to radar, new to real icing, new to high altitude convection, new to SIDS and STARS. Not sure you can do that flying 3-4 times a month.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 18:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12206 Post Likes: +3089 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I would have to say that I am not sure someone flying 3-4 times a month should really be flying a flight level plane in a most weather mission. Flying the plane is not hard, but learning to handle the curve balls thrown by mother nature and ATC requires more time in the saddle IMHO. Maybe if you are an experienced cross country high altitude flyer and moving into an SF50, that works. But most of these position holders are new to pressurization, new to turbine, new to jets, new to flight level flying, new to radar, new to real icing, new to high altitude convection, new to SIDS and STARS. Not sure you can do that flying 3-4 times a month. Sorry, I disagree. The SF50 is shorter ranged then you are used to thinking in terms of jet. It really is more like a turboprop in terms of incremental performance. The SF50 probably best compares to a Meridian or KA-90. I probably made a larger jump from a Cirrus SR20 to an Aerostar 700 then many of the pilots in these programs are making. Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 21:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12206 Post Likes: +3089 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But, I agree, even though the single engine turbo prop and SF50 are quoted as being, "easy to fly" they are going to be flying around in high workload environments.
Define high workload. Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 21:54 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/14/09 Posts: 6068 Post Likes: +3329 Company: tomdrew.lawyer Location: Des Moines, IA (KDSM)
Aircraft: 1973 Baron E55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But, I agree, even though the single engine turbo prop and SF50 are quoted as being, "easy to fly" they are going to be flying around in high workload environments.
Define high workload. Tim
Them: "Cirrus xyz cross Annie intersection at and maintain 6000, expect Cirrus 4 arrival for the ILS 14L, 200kts or greater for now please."
Me: "Ok, I got the Cirrus xyz part, please repeat everything thereafter."
_________________ C340A/8KCAB/T182T F33C/E55/B58 PA 28/32 Currency 12 M: IPC/BFR, CFII Renewal
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|