24 Nov 2025, 13:28 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 18 Sep 2016, 17:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12191 Post Likes: +3075 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Tim - If I wanted to have fun while commuting, I'd skip the Aerostar and buy an L-39C for about the same price.... I could do more than 60° banks!  Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 19 Sep 2016, 15:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/04/11 Posts: 1709 Post Likes: +244 Company: W. John Gadd, Esq. Location: Florida
Aircraft: C55 Baron
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Tim - If I wanted to have fun while commuting, I'd skip the Aerostar and buy an L-39C for about the same price.... I could do more than 60° banks!  Comparable operating costs? 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 20 Sep 2016, 12:44 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 01/24/10 Posts: 7441 Post Likes: +5132 Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been out of town for a while and not on BT, but just wanted to thank my fellow 421 owners/supporters for correcting Mr. Keeping's inaccurate information!
Robert Robert the "fortunate"pilot owners of 421's know the true facts and costs.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 22 Sep 2016, 20:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/04/11 Posts: 1709 Post Likes: +244 Company: W. John Gadd, Esq. Location: Florida
Aircraft: C55 Baron
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
I've always figured the turbine world was a major, exponential step up in expense and not likely comparable to anything piston powered with respect to operating costs. I was never under the impression they could be realistically cross shopped.
That's what I thought as well, until I started talking to some TC owners and found out the operational costs per hour were pretty close to my Aerostar. But there was another scary scenario rearing its ugly head: if an engine hand grenades you're facing $250K+. Money I simply don't have laying around, nor would I likely ever. But, as I found out, you actually don't have to have all that money in a pile. You can buy a half time engine, or closer to a runout etc and hang that on, for about the same as any piston engine overhaul. And that's when I decided to commit to it. You still need to be able to have enough to cover a HSI, but again, that's no worse than a piston engine overhaul in cost.
Fantastic reply. Was the insurance a killer step up?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 22 Sep 2016, 20:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6653 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
Fantastic reply. Was the insurance a killer step up?
No, but I'm just on liability only now and it's ridiculously cheap. I'll step up to some better coverage eventually when I get some more experience, so cost will increase then.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 23 Sep 2016, 10:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/23/16 Posts: 31 Post Likes: +6
Aircraft: KA250
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I do realize it's comparing kiwis to mangos. I know I WANT the Aerostar, but the 421C probably fits the mission a little better. I think I'm hoping I'll hear so many horror stories about the Cessna that I'll be convinced that going there will be a mistake and I'll just have to modify my mission to fit the A*. But then most 421 owners or previous owners don't have much bad to say about it. The 421C is an outstanding platform and reliable. The stories I read about how bad the engines are just make me laugh. The engines will meet and can exceed TBO. The problem relates more to the pilots abuse of the engines, lack of knowledge or ignorance and the lack of proper maintenance. I was hoping the Thielert/Continental CD-300 Diesel would have received their STC for the 421. They also did trials on the Duke and Aerostar as well. Performance numbers were great doing about 23.2 GPH for both engines. Price I believe was around $60K an engine. The Duke trials was really impressive with the Diesel. 2000 NM, 2400 TBO, 220 KTS/FL 220 and burning 20 GPH both sides.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 23 Sep 2016, 10:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just because old Turbines are very cheap and easy to buy does not mean I want my family riding around "hard IFR" in the flight levels in an old Turbine with differed MX. I have a friend who bought a old 690 and experienced every single emergency possible in the two years he owned it.
Even if you buy one for a dollar it will still cost a lot of money to make it safe and reliable, provided the pilot wants "Safe and Reliable". +1 If you choose a early TP like Adam has you can avoid some of the calendar items that make TP more expensive. Remember Not all TP have the same number of calendar items. That's one of the things that makes the mx more expensive on a TP, than a 421 for instance. The fact that the power plant is turbine will a actually make the yearly Mx less expensive. Flying around in a neglected airplane is a bad idea no matter what the power plant is.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 18:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6653 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Adam - is your Turbo Commander flying yet? Sadly, no.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 25 Oct 2016, 04:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/05/11 Posts: 5248 Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sat in an Aerostar and thought I was in a sardine can. Looked at a 421 and all I could see was gobblygook. Go turbine. Of course YMMV   now I'm looking at a 421 
_________________ “ Embrace the Suck”
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 26 Oct 2016, 09:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/06/11 Posts: 21 Post Likes: +27 Location: Bogota, Colombia
Aircraft: Aerostar 601P
|
|
|
Hello all, great topic. I have good friend purchasing a 421b in the Tampa area. Just want to ask if someone can recommend a shop for a prebuy? Thanks in advance. Miguel
Last edited on 26 Oct 2016, 10:15, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar or 421C Posted: 26 Oct 2016, 10:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/27/10 Posts: 10790 Post Likes: +6894 Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Tim - on the issue of the potty, I agree. I have a policy of shoot first and find out what happened later for the potty on my Citation for flights of any length. I repeatedly insist passengers go to the bathroom before they board. My youngest girl, though, has a problem with this. After fighting with her repeatedly to go to the bathroom, my takeoff call outs when she's onboard are typically "Airspeed alive, 70 knots cross check, V1, rotate, positive rate, gear up" interrupted by I wannaaaa go to the baaaaathroooom.... its good to have it if only for emergencies. With kids it's tough for them I think. I've literally had to interrupt my initial climb to make a landing for a potty stop, where the climb was a climbout from the previous potty stop for the same kid. What am I going to do? Get mad at a kid who has to use the bathroom? That's not a vector towards any good outcome... Whether it should or shouldn't be the case, it is, and having access to a potty is a big psychological deal and a medium-sized practical deal for making GA travel family-friendly.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|