banner
banner

30 Nov 2025, 06:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 38  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:09 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6653
Post Likes: +5963
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Sorry, had too many glasses of wine when I wrote that and was too confrontational. Didn't mean to imply that 421 owners are suckers by any means. Wrong wording. I should have said that it just makes it less financially advantageous, that's all. :bud:

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Last edited on 06 Nov 2015, 10:30, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/27/10
Posts: 10790
Post Likes: +6894
Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
Username Protected wrote:
Looks to be just a little more than a casual observance from Mr. Sokoloff...

;)
Hah. I can't even tell you how many spreadsheets I have for 421C vs Mu-2 vs C90 vs 501. None fit the "expense reduction specialist" moniker, though... :)

The left side of the main spreadsheet started with 182, I skipped over the P210 and Aztek columns, and I'm slowly marching to the right. I guess it's time to increase the flow into the top of the bucket... ;)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/25/12
Posts: 3922
Post Likes: +4181
Location: KRHV San Jose, CA
Aircraft: A36, R44, C525
The OP asks about Cessna and here comes the MU2 and Commander cheerleaders.
A couple positive comments by other posters about how this topic has stayed the course but some folks just want to change it.

_________________
Rocky Hill

Altitude is Everything.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:18 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20781
Post Likes: +26295
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Maintaining a GTSIO-520 and a TPE331 are not a lot different in price.

Don't forget the exhaust system on the twin Cessnas. By AD, it has to be inspected when the engine is overhauled, and that can be $10-20K a side depending on what is wrong. Very important, there were lots of accidents related to poor exhaust on turbocharged twin Cessnas.

Roughly speaking:

GTSIO-520 overhaul: $70K/1600 hours
Exhaust: $10K/1600 hours
Oil changes: $250/50 hours
Magneto work: $1500/500 hours
Top overhaul: $15K/1600 hours (one per TBO)
Fuel: 22 GPH block/hr, $5.50/gal

Total works out to $68/hour without fuel, $188/hour with fuel.

TPE331-10 overhaul: $225K/5000 hours
Exhaust: none
Oil changes: $400/900 hours
Fuel nozzles: $800/400 hours
HSI: $40K/5000 hours (one per TBO)
Fuel: 37 GPH block, $3.50/gal

Total works out to $55/hour without fuel, $185/hour with fuel.

Within the accuracy of this exercise, it is a tie. You can play with fuel prices, maintenance prices, etc, and make each engine come out a little ahead of the other, but at the end of the day, they just aren't that much different in $/hr.

Once you normalize for speed, the TPE331 engine costs less per mile than a GTSIO-520.

This doesn't put any value on the reliability difference, which is huge. Plus no misfueling accident, no threat of 100LL going away, 300 knots changes your life, etc...

This is the math that convinced me to look at MU2 numbers. The MU2 is the answer to the question "what is the most performance I can get for 421 money?".

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:18 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Me too Jim. :D

Every time I open up the spreadsheets, I somehow expect the numbers to have gotten lower but they haven't. Then I go to the company bank account and expect the numbers to be much higher but they're not.

You're exactly right - gotta put some more cabbage in the funnel. No problem...

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:19 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6653
Post Likes: +5963
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
The geared Lycomings the factory orphaned decades ago. Still good parts availability because of all the GO-480's out there, but there will come a day. Also, the only guys sitting on parts (they bought Lycomings inventory) and specializing in overhauls charge you an arm and a a leg, because they know they have you over a barrell.

Are the geared Continentals still factory supported? Or is it a similar scenario where one seller sits on most of the parts?

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/27/10
Posts: 10790
Post Likes: +6894
Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
You can buy a GTSIO-520 new from Continental today and can still get parts.

IIRC, there was a pinch on starter adapter viscous dampers a short while ago, but that was a supplier QC issue I believe.

Should be no near-term concern to operators, IMO.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 10:38 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/20/09
Posts: 2666
Post Likes: +2242
Company: Jcrane, Inc.
Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
Username Protected wrote:
Are the geared Continentals still factory supported?

Yes. You can buy a factory new one as well. They also stock many of them according to the inventory list on their website.

_________________
Jack
N441M N107XX


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 14:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/27/08
Posts: 6058
Post Likes: +1031
Location: St Louis, MO
Aircraft: Out of airplane biz
Username Protected wrote:
Does anyone know where I can get a pdf version of the POH for a 421B?


Steve,
Are you thinking about coming to the dark side of twin Cessnas? I love mine!!!

:D Yes Tony, a cabin class twin is on the medium term goal list. Pressurization, AC, and potty . . . all the better. :thumbup:
_________________
User 963

There's no difference between those that refuse to learn and those that can't learn!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 14:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2824
Post Likes: +2745
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
Username Protected wrote:
Sorry, had too many glasses of wine when I wrote that and was too confrontational. Didn't mean to imply that 421 owners are suckers by any means. Wrong wording. I should have said that it just makes it less financially advantageous, that's all. :bud:


Apology accepted!

As others have pointed out, Continental does a great job of supporting these engines - Noting at all like the orphaned Lycoming.

You can purchase brand new GTSIO-520's from Continental and they will build them up in Mobile for you! Continental also offers factory remans and of course RAM will sell you an overhauled engine. There are a number of shops who will overhaul them for less $ as well.

The GTSIO is slightly more expensive to overhaul than the 520's that are on 340 & 414s - RAM shows $60k for a GTSIO-520 and $50k for a TSIO-520, so there's a $20k difference between a 414/340 and the 421 over the life of two engines just for overhaul costs. There are those who would argue that the difference is less because the GTSIO runs cooler and doesn't go through cylinders as fast, but that's likely offset by the starter adapter inspections.

Over 1600 hours, the $20k difference in engine overhaul costs is $12.5/hour. Worth it for me.

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 14:44 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20781
Post Likes: +26295
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
There are those who would argue that the difference is less because the GTSIO runs cooler and doesn't go through cylinders as fast

My research suggest this is true.

I'd rather have the GTSIO-520 than the TSIO-520. The TSIO-520 in the 340/414 feels like it is working quite a bit harder despite being lower power.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 16:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/09/13
Posts: 1249
Post Likes: +246
Location: Frederick , MD (KHGR)
Aircraft: C421 B36TC 58P
The cost of the 421C engines is precisely why I 1st looked for low time engines when I purchased mine.. Just look at controller and see the cost some of the owners are asking for the 421 with 200-400 hrs left till 1600.. Pretty crazy...... $140k in the engines....

I believe the new engines have a heavy case that has been designed to mitigate the case problems...

_________________
Good Luck,

Tim
-------------------


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 16:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/18/10
Posts: 458
Post Likes: +114
Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
Username Protected wrote:
I went and looked at my first 340 today, and for all the people who said my family would probably out grow it in a few years, I have to agree. After looking at it, it is bigger then the Baron, but the nose baggage was smaller then what I was hoping for and since most people fly with the 5th seat removed, and I will need that seat in there alot, we have decided to scratch the 340 from our looking pull and just look at 414's and 421. All the advice has been great so far, I really appreciate the time everyone who has responded has put into their posts.


My 78 P210 has a useful load of 1370 pounds. It has tip tanks - so nearly 7 hours with no reserves. I work on 5 hours with reserves, which takes us 900 nm in nil wind. This gives us 620 pounds for passengers and baggage. Our family of 5 (3 boys, 8, 6, 3 yrs old) only weighs 480 pounds at this stage - so we can still take 140 pounds of bags. The 210 has been a wonderful travelling machine for our family - very frequently we all pile into it.

However I am very mindful of how quickly we are outgrowing the 210 - 3 boys grow before your eyes. Plus our 210 doesn't have any ice protection.

I always thought a 340 or baron would be our next plane - but like Cliff I am starting to think a 414 or 421 is what we need.

To compare to my 210 - how many pounds of people/baggage can a 421 carry going 900nm with 2 hours reserve?


900nm with 2 hours reserve is pretty much going to be max endurance even for the 262g 421cs. Depending on the plane 500#-850# full fuel payload, with fixed gear on the higher end and trailing on the lower.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 17:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2824
Post Likes: +2745
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
Username Protected wrote:
$140k in the engines....


Not that much different than a 340/414/P Barron though. In fact, RAM lists the PBarron engine at $54k vs $59k for the 421 engine.

For some reason many people think the GTSIO 520 is crazy expensive to overhaul. It's just not true... It's between $5 & $10k more expensive to overhaul a GTSIO-520 than a non-G TSIO520.

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Nov 2015, 17:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/15/13
Posts: 748
Post Likes: +298
Location: Florida-Missouri
Aircraft: V35B
TSIO 520 cases definitely have cracking issues. Just replaced one w/ new that had been repaired 4 times before on the current reman (Western Skyways). Cost for the new case-5,600. :sad:

_________________
__________________________


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 38  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.sarasota.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.