08 Jun 2025, 08:12 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand  Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 11:03 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Cost. The PL stuff just costs too much and makes the retail price of the airplane too high.
However, Collins could easily change that, if they simply change their pricing. But apparently they won't, so, as seems to be the pattern of things, Garmin will continue to eat their lunch, they will go out of business as a viable option, then not too long after the Garmin equipment will begin to cost more too. This isn't a good enough reason. It's not just cost. Your reason implies the Gamin is inferior and costs less. That's not the case. It's better and costs less.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 11:06 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 07/08/11
Posts: 399
Post Likes: +53
Location: Valentine,NE
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Gorgeous new airplane, Luke!
I really do need to come out one day before summer is over to meet and look over the toys! Absolutely Bob! Bring your clubs !
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 11:14 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6060
Post Likes: +709
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
The G1000 controls the pressurization in the TBM 900 also. Username Protected wrote: I see our guys calculate their various speeds on the g1000 all the time in our phenom.... Also I seem to remember the pressurisation being worked into the G1000 in the Phenom. The g1000 in the Phenom is very integrated. As far as I know it cannot build/fly a hold at a waypoint. But easy enough to do and fly manually.
_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 12:57 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 07/17/11
Posts: 2472
Post Likes: +1152
Location: Dallas, TX
Aircraft: Airbus, King Air 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Cost. The PL stuff just costs too much and makes the retail price of the airplane too high.
However, Collins could easily change that, if they simply change their pricing. But apparently they won't, so, as seems to be the pattern of things, Garmin will continue to eat their lunch, they will go out of business as a viable option, then not too long after the Garmin equipment will begin to cost more too. This isn't a good enough reason. It's not just cost. Your reason implies the Gamin is inferior and costs less. That's not the case. It's better and costs less.
jason how much Proline 21 time do you have
_________________
ATP CFI/II
B350, B1900, A-320
USC Aviation Safety & Security Program Certificate
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 13:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
jason how much Proline 21 time do you have
I flew a CJ once and was like WTF? Then I ran home to momma  It doesn't matter what my experience with the system is. What matters is the "market" and what it's supporting right now. Of course I could buy a CJ and go learn Proline but why bother when the future is Garmin. It's a great time to wait for a Garmin jet on the used market. So many new ones coming out.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 28 Jul 2014, 04:08 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/06/13
Posts: 158
Post Likes: +63
Location: UK
Aircraft: C90XP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: People who have generally flown Garmin prefer Garmin. No surprise. People who fly both, and who fly full-blown SID-Airway-STAR-Approach IFR all the time tend to have more of a mix of views.
Then why aren't manufacturers building with PL21 anymore? I don't think you've seen the latest Garmin stuff. Also, it's not just about how it functions while flying. It shouldn't take 10 minutes for the avionics in my airplane to boot up. A data upload shouldn't take an hour and require being able to write code.
Because PL21 is overall inferior from the point of view of the purchase decision maker.
You keep asking me questions as if I'd written "PL21 is better than Garmin". I haven't. I agree with all the points you make.
I am making a specific point about the logic and function of the FMS engine. PL21 has a full featured multi-sensor FMS. Garmin doesn't. In that respect, and that respect only, PL21 has an advantage over Garmin.
I am not claiming that this specific advantage makes it "better" overall than Garmin or that the market is "wrong".
I am just pointing out that for some pilots, despite the "overall" superiority of Garmin, there is a specific advantage to the PL21. This advantage is at its clearest in the comparison of PL21 vs first-gen turbine G1000 (eg. in the Mustang). Garmin have been closing the gap slowly with different iterations of the G1000 in different airframes. Baro-VNAV in the King Air retrofit is an example.
I have now answered your question 5 times. Hope that is clear.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 28 Jul 2014, 05:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You keep asking me questions as if I'd written "PL21 is better than Garmin". I haven't. Yes you have
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 28 Jul 2014, 11:06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Over the weekend I saw a new Cessna Citation X, and a Sovereign.....both with Garmin 5000 systems. Collins may have priced itself out... I was right seating in a CJ-4 with PL 21, I need to catch a trip in a Garmin plane to compare. $100 says Collins and Honeywell have never heard of Garmin.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 28 Jul 2014, 11:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I doubt Honeywell really gives a crap. Think they do all the airlines. From what I've been told it's really a 2 pilot system. And in some ways a lot more capable (probably Cat II and CatIII stuff) That statement right there is what will lead to their demise. "2 pilot system anyways"? That's ridiculous. The airlines are foaming at the mouth to find a way to have 1 pilot or no pilots. Innovate or die. How long til Garmin takes the Boeing biz? I'll bet not long at all.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 28 Jul 2014, 11:35 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 08/05/11
Posts: 5248
Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I doubt Honeywell really gives a crap. Think they do all the airlines. From what I've been told it's really a 2 pilot system. And in some ways a lot more capable (probably Cat II and CatIII stuff) That statement right there is what will lead to their demise. "2 pilot system anyways"? That's ridiculous. The airlines are foaming at the mouth to find a way to have 1 pilot or no pilots. Innovate or die. How long til Garmin takes the Boeing biz? I'll bet not long at all.
Spot on. Sit at top resting on your laurels unaware someone is just waiting to take you out. See it in business all the time.
_________________
“ Embrace the Suck”
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 28 Jul 2014, 14:39 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 06/08/12
Posts: 12581
Post Likes: +5188
Company: Mayo Clinic
Location: Rochester, MN
Aircraft: Planeless in RST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: By the way, Ford is better than Chevy. And .40 is better than 9mm Ya but, what about twins and parachutes??? 
_________________
BFR 8/18; IPC 8/18
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|
