24 Oct 2025, 03:06 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT  Posted: 16 Oct 2024, 11:05 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6410
Post Likes: +5147
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1846265336602963986 Attachment: IMG_1834.png I love when things are cited that have no references, if you goto the latest official documents, the estimate was closer to 1.5b, not 2.7b and that's 100% NASA's fault for doing a cost plus contract, also it's for the mobile launch platform, not a "stationary tower" so much misinformation here
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 16 Oct 2024, 11:45 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 07/19/10
Posts: 3274
Post Likes: +1627
Company: Keller Williams Realty
Location: Madison, WI (91C)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: so much misinformation here Yes, sensationalism at it's best. Doesn't change the fact that SpaceX would probably build it faster and cheaper. If (and that's a big one) they would believe in it as a means to an end. I fully expect that Musk would say 'having mobile launch platform is stupid, we're not doing it no matter what'. SpaceX achieves extraordinary results because every single employee believes they are pulling in the right direction.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 17 Oct 2024, 10:29 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 8200
Post Likes: +7936
Location: New York, NY
Aircraft: Debonair C33A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dhJ-zYTQHgw Impressive how they caught it by these tiny hard points. Earlier images looked like it was hanging by the grid fins, which are a somewhat larger target. The timing to accomplish that had to be just perfect.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 17 Oct 2024, 10:51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/19/10
Posts: 3274
Post Likes: +1627
Company: Keller Williams Realty
Location: Madison, WI (91C)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dhJ-zYTQHgw Impressive how they caught it by these tiny hard points. Earlier images looked like it was hanging by the grid fins, which are a somewhat larger target. The timing to accomplish that had to be just perfect.
The grid fins are moveable, wouldn't make any sense to design that system to both move and be able to suspend all that weight.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 17 Oct 2024, 10:58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6410
Post Likes: +5147
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dhJ-zYTQHgw Impressive how they caught it by these tiny hard points. Earlier images looked like it was hanging by the grid fins, which are a somewhat larger target. The timing to accomplish that had to be just perfect.
This is one of the best analysis I've seen on it, and it was published before the catch, this guy has spent thousands of hours reverse engineering and developing cad assets of the designs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub6HdADut50
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 18 Oct 2024, 17:46 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13
Posts: 21862
Post Likes: +22498
Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Impressive how they caught it by these tiny hard points. Earlier images looked like it was hanging by the grid fins, which are a somewhat larger target. The timing to accomplish that had to be just perfect. Not just hanging on those tiny hard points, but perfectly oriented in all three axes while doing so. The hard points have to be oriented almost perfectly perpendicular to the catch arms, the booster has to be close to vertical and horizontally aligned within the reach of the arms, then it has to be hovering. They literally put it on a dime.
_________________
My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 26 Oct 2024, 17:22 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08
Posts: 7357
Post Likes: +4089
Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx.
Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Last I heard they’re looking at NET November 11. That’s crazy. I have to think there wasn’t great hope of the S-0 infrastructure being intact.
_________________
Tom Johnson-Az/Wy
AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance
Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com
C: 602-628-2701
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|
