banner
banner

21 Jun 2025, 10:26 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 19  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 20 Jan 2021, 09:19 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/19/14
Posts: 53
Post Likes: +25
Location: N40
Aircraft: P46T, T34
Michael, I have experience flying both a Piper Meridian and the PC12. My flying on the PC12 was before the Meridian, and I was a much lower time pilot when I started flying the PC12.

Don't believe that the M600 is easier to fly than the PC12 because of its size. In some ways, I feel the PC12 was actually easier than the Meridian, especially on ground handling. The PC12 is an extremely stable platform. At the end of the day, the decision making is what will most likely get you hurt, and it won't matter whether you are in a TBM, M600, or PC12..

The Meridian has been less expensive than the PC12. But, they are frankly an apples and oranges comparison. If you need the seats, you can't beat the PC12.

Feel free to shoot me a message and I'll try and answer any questions that you have regarding my experience with Piper and Pilatus.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 20 Jan 2021, 10:05 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/11
Posts: 9196
Post Likes: +4825
Aircraft: Warbirds
Some of our recent trips in a TBM850. 900 series are a tad faster and don’t have a speed restriction for ice door use.
Top two are about 930 SM trips.
Attachment:
1CE0543E-7273-4376-8A4E-B64B2BF22CDD.png


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 12:43 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 2320
Post Likes: +720
Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
I’ve been following this thread with interest. I do not have any experience with the meridian but have about 1000 hours in TBMs. I agree all three have different missions.
90% of my flying is just myself and my wife. TBM is perfect. PC 12 would be a great bird if we needed more seats, haul more stuff or needed longer legs. Bathroom in the TBM is kinda a circus........I’ve never seen one in an actual TBM. Im ok with no bathroom......after 3-4 hours I’m ready for a break regardless. Did 4 hours back from Florida yesterday.......I was ready to land by then.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 13:13 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7095
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
Did 4 hours back from Florida yesterday.......I was ready to land by then.


That's because you needed to pee :duck:

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 13:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4347
Post Likes: +3134
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
Piper builds a great airplane, and I like the new M500/M600.

However, TBM / PC12 are not in the same category as the M600. They are tanks- built like military gear.

An 800 mile trip takes 2+55 vs 2+37; 18 minutes difference (it may be more as I'm using TBM850 numbers). 850 gets 305-315 true, 900s see 315-325.

The TBM is like a Ferrari SUV; incredibly well built, and incredibly fast; not crowded, but not large. We would have no trouble in the TBM with 3 adults and 3 kids (even 5 adults). I have seen the demo of the TBM lav, it's absolutely enough to get the job done, but it's a 90k option that we've never needed. the plane is so fast you don't need the lav. However, the PC12 is clearly more luxurious for passengers. It's a mini-airliner.

I believe the PC12 costs more to maintain (specialized equipment needed for annuals, different avionics), but has a better mishap track-record (they tend to be corporate flown rather than owner flown); however the TBM is an incredibly easy airplane to fly and master.

either way- send pics of what you end up getting!

_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 13:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/24/14
Posts: 1907
Post Likes: +2622
Username Protected wrote:
Did 4 hours back from Florida yesterday.......I was ready to land by then.


That's because you needed to pee :duck:

Honest question and if it has been answered, I apologize. Do you use a bottle to pee in when you're flying by yourself?
_________________
Jay


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 14:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/06/12
Posts: 2428
Post Likes: +2532
Company: FlightRepublic
Location: Bee Cave, TX
Aircraft: SR20
I’ve not yet flown a plane with an onboard potty, but with three kids between 3 and 10, I would consider it essential for any traveling plane, unless you’re willing to make endless unscheduled stops!

_________________
Antoni Deighton


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 15:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1596
Post Likes: +1489
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
My main mission is 2.5-3 hours and we have had someone use our lav at least 5 times in the My Mother would not fly with me in my PA-46 as she was afraid she would need to use the Lav and we didn't have one. She will fly in our 421 and isn't worried about the Lav anymore. She has yet to use it but the fact that it's there is the difference between her flying with me or not.

I will usually use a Pee bag (the kind with the baby diaper pellets that absorb the fluid) at 3 hours or so. Could I hold it and make it yes but coming into busy airspace the last thing I need is the distraction of needing to pee.


having a proper Lav is the difference between a small plane and a small airliner.

If I was spending $3.5M I would for damn sure have a proper Lav.

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 15:06 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14383
Post Likes: +9513
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
I love having a lav.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 821
Post Likes: +312
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
Username Protected wrote:
Piper builds a great airplane, and I like the new M500/M600.

However, TBM / PC12 are not in the same category as the M600. They are tanks- built like military gear.

An 800 mile trip takes 2+55 vs 2+37; 18 minutes difference (it may be more as I'm using TBM850 numbers). 850 gets 305-315 true, 900s see 315-325.

The TBM is like a Ferrari SUV; incredibly well built, and incredibly fast; not crowded, but not large. We would have no trouble in the TBM with 3 adults and 3 kids (even 5 adults). I have seen the demo of the TBM lav, it's absolutely enough to get the job done, but it's a 90k option that we've never needed. the plane is so fast you don't need the lav. However, the PC12 is clearly more luxurious for passengers. It's a mini-airliner.

I believe the PC12 costs more to maintain (specialized equipment needed for annuals, different avionics), but has a better mishap track-record (they tend to be corporate flown rather than owner flown); however the TBM is an incredibly easy airplane to fly and master.

either way- send pics of what you end up getting!

Both the TBM and the PC-12 are considerably more expensive to acquire, operate, and maintain than a Meridian. Those extra seats or a bit more speed don't come without a considerable increase in cost. People are right in their apples to oranges comparison. You can't itemize the pros without the cons.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:35 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 10/04/19
Posts: 652
Post Likes: +402
Company: Capella Partners
Location: Alpine Airpark, 46U
Aircraft: P35, TW Pacer
What is it about the PA-46 turbine series which is less expensive to "operate and maintain" than the TBM or PC-12 series?

Cost per mile in gas? Fixed costs? MX schedule (hours vs calendar items)? I see this mentioned a lot but never expounded upon.

-J

_________________
PPL AMEL
@jacksonholepilot on instagram
firstlast@gmail.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 821
Post Likes: +312
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
Username Protected wrote:
What is it about the PA-46 turbine series which is less expensive to "operate and maintain" than the TBM or PC-12 series?

Cost per mile in gas? Fixed costs? MX schedule (hours vs calendar items)? I see this mentioned a lot but never expounded upon.

-J

38 gallons per hour versus 55-60 gallons per hour for fuel.

P46T is maintained on an annual inspection basis, same as all pistons. No phase inspections. Gear overhauls on the TBM I I understand are very expensive. My Meridian annuals are $15-25k which includes optional items. Based inspection fee is $6500 I believe. Here is a previous thread on this topic: viewtopic.php?t=135310


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:48 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 10/04/19
Posts: 652
Post Likes: +402
Company: Capella Partners
Location: Alpine Airpark, 46U
Aircraft: P35, TW Pacer
Username Protected wrote:
What is it about the PA-46 turbine series which is less expensive to "operate and maintain" than the TBM or PC-12 series?

Cost per mile in gas? Fixed costs? MX schedule (hours vs calendar items)? I see this mentioned a lot but never expounded upon.

-J

38 gallons per hour versus 55-60 gallons per hour for fuel.

P46T is maintained on an annual inspection basis, same as all pistons. No phase inspections. Gear overhauls on the TBM I I understand are very expensive. My Meridian annuals are $15-25k which includes optional items. Based inspection fee is $6500 I believe. Here is a previous thread on this topic: viewtopic.php?t=135310


Thanks Greg, just what I was looking for. Probably beats my baron @ 195 KTAS/25gph. Not sure about the annuals though.
-J
_________________
PPL AMEL
@jacksonholepilot on instagram
firstlast@gmail.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 821
Post Likes: +312
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
If you factor in how much cheaper Jet-A is versus 100LL I think you may be right. Cost per NM may be cheaper in the Meridian than your Baron.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 21 Jan 2021, 17:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4347
Post Likes: +3134
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
ironically, if I fly the TBM at 44gph, I get the same TAS as I did in my C340 (200 true), for the exact same 44gph.

and yes- jet fuel is way cheaper.

_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 19  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.