21 Jun 2025, 15:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 20 Jan 2021, 09:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/19/14 Posts: 53 Post Likes: +25 Location: N40
Aircraft: P46T, T34
|
|
Michael, I have experience flying both a Piper Meridian and the PC12. My flying on the PC12 was before the Meridian, and I was a much lower time pilot when I started flying the PC12.
Don't believe that the M600 is easier to fly than the PC12 because of its size. In some ways, I feel the PC12 was actually easier than the Meridian, especially on ground handling. The PC12 is an extremely stable platform. At the end of the day, the decision making is what will most likely get you hurt, and it won't matter whether you are in a TBM, M600, or PC12..
The Meridian has been less expensive than the PC12. But, they are frankly an apples and oranges comparison. If you need the seats, you can't beat the PC12.
Feel free to shoot me a message and I'll try and answer any questions that you have regarding my experience with Piper and Pilatus.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 20 Jan 2021, 10:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/11 Posts: 9197 Post Likes: +4825
Aircraft: Warbirds
|
|
Some of our recent trips in a TBM850. 900 series are a tad faster and don’t have a speed restriction for ice door use. Top two are about 930 SM trips. Attachment: 1CE0543E-7273-4376-8A4E-B64B2BF22CDD.png
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 12:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/23/09 Posts: 2320 Post Likes: +720 Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
|
|
I’ve been following this thread with interest. I do not have any experience with the meridian but have about 1000 hours in TBMs. I agree all three have different missions. 90% of my flying is just myself and my wife. TBM is perfect. PC 12 would be a great bird if we needed more seats, haul more stuff or needed longer legs. Bathroom in the TBM is kinda a circus........I’ve never seen one in an actual TBM. Im ok with no bathroom......after 3-4 hours I’m ready for a break regardless. Did 4 hours back from Florida yesterday.......I was ready to land by then.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 13:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7095 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Did 4 hours back from Florida yesterday.......I was ready to land by then. That's because you needed to pee 
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 13:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/05/09 Posts: 4347 Post Likes: +3134 Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
|
|
Piper builds a great airplane, and I like the new M500/M600.
However, TBM / PC12 are not in the same category as the M600. They are tanks- built like military gear.
An 800 mile trip takes 2+55 vs 2+37; 18 minutes difference (it may be more as I'm using TBM850 numbers). 850 gets 305-315 true, 900s see 315-325.
The TBM is like a Ferrari SUV; incredibly well built, and incredibly fast; not crowded, but not large. We would have no trouble in the TBM with 3 adults and 3 kids (even 5 adults). I have seen the demo of the TBM lav, it's absolutely enough to get the job done, but it's a 90k option that we've never needed. the plane is so fast you don't need the lav. However, the PC12 is clearly more luxurious for passengers. It's a mini-airliner.
I believe the PC12 costs more to maintain (specialized equipment needed for annuals, different avionics), but has a better mishap track-record (they tend to be corporate flown rather than owner flown); however the TBM is an incredibly easy airplane to fly and master.
either way- send pics of what you end up getting!
_________________ "Find worthy causes in your life."
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 13:44 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/24/14 Posts: 1907 Post Likes: +2622
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Did 4 hours back from Florida yesterday.......I was ready to land by then. That's because you needed to pee  Honest question and if it has been answered, I apologize. Do you use a bottle to pee in when you're flying by yourself?
_________________ Jay
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 821 Post Likes: +312 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Piper builds a great airplane, and I like the new M500/M600.
However, TBM / PC12 are not in the same category as the M600. They are tanks- built like military gear.
An 800 mile trip takes 2+55 vs 2+37; 18 minutes difference (it may be more as I'm using TBM850 numbers). 850 gets 305-315 true, 900s see 315-325.
The TBM is like a Ferrari SUV; incredibly well built, and incredibly fast; not crowded, but not large. We would have no trouble in the TBM with 3 adults and 3 kids (even 5 adults). I have seen the demo of the TBM lav, it's absolutely enough to get the job done, but it's a 90k option that we've never needed. the plane is so fast you don't need the lav. However, the PC12 is clearly more luxurious for passengers. It's a mini-airliner.
I believe the PC12 costs more to maintain (specialized equipment needed for annuals, different avionics), but has a better mishap track-record (they tend to be corporate flown rather than owner flown); however the TBM is an incredibly easy airplane to fly and master.
either way- send pics of what you end up getting! Both the TBM and the PC-12 are considerably more expensive to acquire, operate, and maintain than a Meridian. Those extra seats or a bit more speed don't come without a considerable increase in cost. People are right in their apples to oranges comparison. You can't itemize the pros without the cons.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 821 Post Likes: +312 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What is it about the PA-46 turbine series which is less expensive to "operate and maintain" than the TBM or PC-12 series?
Cost per mile in gas? Fixed costs? MX schedule (hours vs calendar items)? I see this mentioned a lot but never expounded upon.
-J 38 gallons per hour versus 55-60 gallons per hour for fuel. P46T is maintained on an annual inspection basis, same as all pistons. No phase inspections. Gear overhauls on the TBM I I understand are very expensive. My Meridian annuals are $15-25k which includes optional items. Based inspection fee is $6500 I believe. Here is a previous thread on this topic: viewtopic.php?t=135310
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 16:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/04/19 Posts: 652 Post Likes: +402 Company: Capella Partners Location: Alpine Airpark, 46U
Aircraft: P35, TW Pacer
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What is it about the PA-46 turbine series which is less expensive to "operate and maintain" than the TBM or PC-12 series?
Cost per mile in gas? Fixed costs? MX schedule (hours vs calendar items)? I see this mentioned a lot but never expounded upon.
-J 38 gallons per hour versus 55-60 gallons per hour for fuel. P46T is maintained on an annual inspection basis, same as all pistons. No phase inspections. Gear overhauls on the TBM I I understand are very expensive. My Meridian annuals are $15-25k which includes optional items. Based inspection fee is $6500 I believe. Here is a previous thread on this topic: viewtopic.php?t=135310
Thanks Greg, just what I was looking for. Probably beats my baron @ 195 KTAS/25gph. Not sure about the annuals though. -J
_________________ PPL AMEL @jacksonholepilot on instagram firstlast@gmail.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|