02 Dec 2025, 21:33 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 13:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/15/16 Posts: 441 Post Likes: +349 Location: NC
Aircraft: Looking for one
|
|
|
Oh, I imagine they will do another gofundme to cover moving it. He needs somewhere with 12000 ft runway.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 15:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/20/15 Posts: 668 Post Likes: +369 Location: KFAT
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How difficult would it be to remove the wings and transport the plane to a larger airport?
is that a week long process or day long?
Mike I can't say for certain about the raptor, but my plane can be on a trailer in about 4 hours. Now that's a trailer that has brackets that tilt the plane so it doesn't require any wide load placards or permits.
Slick trailer setup, Don
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 15:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/28/17 Posts: 1353 Post Likes: +1437 Location: Panama City, FL
Aircraft: Velocity XL-RG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I thought the issue was that the runway is too short for a takeoff and landing without flying a pattern so you can abort shortly after becoming airborne. None of us know exactly why the test pilots declined to fly. But I don't think not being able to do a runway hop is the primary reason. I'm guessing the reason is that there's simply no suitable off-airport landing area.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 15:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/28/17 Posts: 1353 Post Likes: +1437 Location: Panama City, FL
Aircraft: Velocity XL-RG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Slick trailer setup, Don It really is. This belongs to the guy who transports planes for Velocity. Before he built this, it took a bit longer to get the plane on the trailer.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 17:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/15/16 Posts: 441 Post Likes: +349 Location: NC
Aircraft: Looking for one
|
|
|
Well, he plans to move to an airport with at least 8,000 ft.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 18:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/26/15 Posts: 10045 Post Likes: +10042 Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320) Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Well, he plans to move to an airport with at least 8,000 ft. Pretty solid plan. He got a lot of valuable testing out of his home drone while having the convenience of his own hangar there. I do hope he comes up with some better, permanent solutions for the uhhhhmmm I'm gonna call them "quick fixes" that have caused a lot of the contention on this thread.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 23:50 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 36059 Post Likes: +14446 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm guessing the reason is that there's simply no suitable off-airport landing area. If you remain within gliding distance of the departure airport, why would you need to make an off airport landing?
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 23:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/11/14 Posts: 1474 Post Likes: +424 Location: 46U
Aircraft: C182, Lancair IV-P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm guessing the reason is that there's simply no suitable off-airport landing area. If you remain within gliding distance of the departure airport, why would you need to make an off airport landing?
Would assume it’s for the case where there is not enough altitude to return to the airport. You want clear spaces at end of runway...
Best,
Tom
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 31 Jul 2020, 01:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/06/14 Posts: 7321 Post Likes: +8994 Company: The French Tradition Location: KCRQ - Carlsbad - KTOA
Aircraft: 89 A36 TN, 78 Tiger
|
|
|
I would spend the money to bring it to a dry lake. Cheaper than 6 months in a hospital... Giant dry lake, lots of room to make subtle turns in ground effect to debug the small things. Then when all is good, start climbing. But if things go wrong, land anywhere In a normal airport, once you are in ground effect, you are committed, no turning back. Even in a 8' feet runway, you will be eating that distance really fast, no time to make some assessments about the worthiness of this beast.
_________________ Bonanza 89 A36 Turbo Norm Grumman Tiger 78
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 31 Jul 2020, 07:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/22/07 Posts: 14721 Post Likes: +16855 Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm guessing the reason is that there's simply no suitable off-airport landing area. If you remain within gliding distance of the departure airport, why would you need to make an off airport landing? Fire. Structural failure. Control failure.
_________________ Holoholo …
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 31 Jul 2020, 09:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 9768 Post Likes: +16708 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you remain within gliding distance of the departure airport Therein lies the rub. In a heavy, underpowered airplane with a very high wing loading and corresponding high liftoff speed, you need a REALLY long runway in order to stay within gliding distance during takeoff and climb. Suitable off airport landing zones off the departure end are a darn good idea for the first few flights at a minimum.
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 31 Jul 2020, 10:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/17/09 Posts: 1955 Post Likes: +2311 Location: North Idaho!
Aircraft: F33A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you remain within gliding distance of the departure airport Therein lies the rub. In a heavy, underpowered airplane with a very high wing loading and corresponding high liftoff speed, you need a REALLY long runway in order to stay within gliding distance during takeoff and climb. This^ The taxi tests have shown the take-off ground run is twice as long as expected. 5000 feet should have been adequate, but Peter has been taking all 5000 feet to just accelerate/stop. There is no margin.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|