04 May 2025, 10:17 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 04 Jun 2013, 11:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/18/08 Posts: 388 Post Likes: +25 Location: X55 Mid Florida (Orlando)
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Think "Trans Texas Airways" or TTA aka Tree Top Airline. Then Texas International and then bought up by Continental. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_International_AirlinesDan Right idea, but you have it backwards. It was Texas Air Corp. that bought Continental, not the other way around. CO was on the ropes, and Texas Air had money. The rest is (very contentious and not entirely savory) history. Which means, in essence, that the airline we now call "United" is the successor to Trans-Texas Airways.
Yup. Put myself through college working as a ramp rat at DFW for Texas International. Made great money and really enjoyed it. Sad to watch several of the DC 9 planes repainted to New York Air colors when Frank Lorenzo created Texas Air as the new parent company.
Oh, and don't forget the similar Texas Air run on Eastern before the Continental buyout. Pilot strike ended that historic airline. Tragic CEO story too.
I think I remember this correctly. Late 70's early 80's are a long time ago.
_________________ I like grapes
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 07 Jun 2013, 20:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/08/10 Posts: 6 Post Likes: +2 Location: KSNA
Aircraft: C501
|
|
This model seems very gym membership like.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 07 Jun 2013, 20:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This model seems very gym membership like. And for every gym that is open, there are three that have gone bust.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 11 Jun 2013, 02:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 2092 Post Likes: +995 Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The good news is that there will probably be a few nice used Pilatus's on the market soon. Now that's funny! And likely very true!
_________________ Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 09:15 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/26/10 Posts: 4296 Post Likes: +196 Location: West Palm Beach, FL (KLNA)
Aircraft: 1979 Duke B60
|
|
$1650 is worth it if you use 1 round trip per month! The $500 initiation fee is meant to cover 'background check' costs associated with pre-authorizing you to travel Part 121 without the TSA hassle. I wish them all the best luck, it would be neat to expand and replicate the concept elsewhere in the country. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 11:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12129 Post Likes: +3030 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: $1650 is worth it if you use 1 round trip per month! The $500 initiation fee is meant to cover 'background check' costs associated with pre-authorizing you to travel Part 121 without the TSA hassle. I wish them all the best luck, it would be neat to expand and replicate the concept elsewhere in the country.  Requires multiple large cities in reasonable proximity to each other. Basically only other situation I can see it work is from Boston, NY, Philadelphia, Baltimore, DC and maybe Richmond. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 11:21 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/26/10 Posts: 4296 Post Likes: +196 Location: West Palm Beach, FL (KLNA)
Aircraft: 1979 Duke B60
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Requires multiple large cities in reasonable proximity to each other. Basically only other situation I can see it work is from Boston, NY, Philadelphia, Baltimore, DC and maybe Richmond.
Tim
It worked for Southwest..
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 12:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/13 Posts: 1230 Post Likes: +508 Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
|
|
I heard of a operation using a caravan out of olive branch ms daily flights to panama city gulf shores and back 250 each way
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 15:14 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 1671 Post Likes: +465 Location: Redwood City, CA (KPAO)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 6 months from now the internet will be full of people complaining how they paid $10,400 and managed to get 3 flights out of it, none on a day that they actually wanted to fly and only after they showed up 8 times and got some excuse about maintenance, the weather, 'the pilot' not showing up etc. Actually this should never happen, if Surf plays their cards right. They are absolutely aware of this problem and they have a very easy way to prevent it. They directly control the number of members and the waiting list. As long as there's high contention for seats they simply don't let new members sign up. In the near term, that means they're burning through their VC money. Their hypothesis is that, like a gym membership, average usage per member will decrease over time, which means they will be able to allow more wait-listed people in while keeping bookings relatively flat. If the hypothesis proves true, eventually they can have enough members to turn a profit every month, yet their flights won't be overbooked.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 15:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Their hypothesis is that, like a gym membership, average usage per member will decrease over time, which means they will be able to allow more wait-listed people in while keeping bookings relatively flat. If the hypothesis proves true, eventually they can have enough members to turn a profit every month, yet their flights won't be overbooked. As I said, for every Gym that is open, there are 3 that have closed and bankrupted the franchisee. If you paid $75 and you can't get on a treadmill for 20min, you are going to be moderately peeved. If you paid $3800 and you can't get on a flight and miss a meeting, you are going to be 50.66 times as peeved.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PC-12 based "All You Can Fly" airline startup Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 18:13 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 1671 Post Likes: +465 Location: Redwood City, CA (KPAO)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Their hypothesis is that, like a gym membership, average usage per member will decrease over time, which means they will be able to allow more wait-listed people in while keeping bookings relatively flat. If the hypothesis proves true, eventually they can have enough members to turn a profit every month, yet their flights won't be overbooked. As I said, for every Gym that is open, there are 3 that have closed and bankrupted the franchisee. If you paid $75 and you can't get on a treadmill for 20min, you are going to be moderately peeved. If you paid $3800 and you can't get on a flight and miss a meeting, you are going to be 50.66 times as peeved.
Right, but my point was not that Surf Air won't fail. It very well might fail. In fact, unlike everyone else speculating on this internet forum, I already put my money where my mouth is and bet against Surf Air almost 2 years ago when I decided not to join them.
My point was that overbooked flights shouldn't be a problem, unless they really screw up. They are fully aware of the potential for that problem and it's trivial for them to avoid it, if they choose to do so.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|