banner
banner

07 May 2025, 11:55 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 02:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/12/10
Posts: 1692
Post Likes: +1102
Location: South Texas
Perusing through controller tonight for giggles, I wandered over to the "yea, right" section and started looking at the Citation ISP's for 3-500K. I'm surprised these things aren't moving faster than they are.

Obviously, they're old, slow and shred through fuel- but I was thinking that for the price they'd still be a relatively good steal, no? Conklin has them running at $2,400/hr. The next step up would be a II (6-800K) and then whatever else.

For the acquisition cost being so low, you could peel off about 120 hours a year before the ISP's buy-in + variable cost would meet the next step up's initial cost.

Wouldn't an ISP be a perfect airplane for someone looking to go the jet route and using it as a "trainer" until you hit the cost for a faster/newer airplane?

Anyone know the deal with these older citations?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 02:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8866
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
They are a great deal if you have an IA ticket and you are able to pencil-whip your own phase inspections :peace: .


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 03:26 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/12/10
Posts: 1692
Post Likes: +1102
Location: South Texas
Username Protected wrote:
They are a great deal if you have an IA ticket and you are able to pencil-whip your own phase inspections :peace: .

I think I read about the glorified pre-flight phase inspection that occurs monthly for $800 :dance:

I don't know, looking at these things it just seems like it'd be cheapest way for a guy to get his jet hours out of the way before moving into something else.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 03:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8866
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
I don't know, looking at these things it just seems like it'd be cheapest least outrageously expensive way for a guy to get his jet hours out of the way before moving into something else.


There I fixed it.

In addition to their poor fuel/mpg/payload equation, if anything falls off, the bills are still in jet territory.

If they fly a lot, they eat you with the fuel bill. If they dont fly a lot, they eat you with the ongoing inspection regimen.

They are a great deal if capital costs you money and if you have your own IA on staff who can keep the maintenance cost under control (by pencil-whipping the phase inspections and using parts stolen from the junkyard if something fails).


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 06:16 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/11/10
Posts: 1872
Post Likes: +297
Aircraft: pa 31
Since we are in hypothetical country.... Say you buy one of these "cheap" citations. You operate under part 91. Are you still required to do all these phase inspections?

R


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 06:26 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13077
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
cheapest way for a guy to get his jet hours out of the way before moving into something else.

What does this mean? In my experience, there are no "hours to get out of the way".

The trick to jet ownership is paying for it, not flying it. If you can afford to buy and operate, you can probably afford a CFI to teach you.

I've looked those older Citations also. The phase inspection process is mind numbing. I couldn't figure it out. I don't think the service centers understand it either. They just send a big bill and hope you don't know what they're talking about.


Last edited on 17 May 2013, 06:30, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 06:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8866
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Since we are in hypothetical country.... Say you buy one of these "cheap" citations. You operate under part 91. Are you still required to do all these phase inspections?


For twin turbojets and turboprops: yes.

Funny enough, a single turboprop can be operated with an annual only.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 06:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13077
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Since we are in hypothetical country.... Say you buy one of these "cheap" citations. You operate under part 91. Are you still required to do all these phase inspections?


For twin turbojets and turboprops: yes.

Funny enough, a single turboprop can be operated with an annual only.


Yup, my Piltaus gets an annual every year just like my Bonanza. Most new jets are like this too actually. Phenoms are annuals only

Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 06:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8866
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Yup, my Piltaus gets an annual every year just like my Bonanza. Most new jets are like this too actually. Phenoms are annuals only


I dont think there is a requirement to do a 'phase inspection' program for a twin-jet, but you do have to adhere to whatever the manufacturer cooked up. The Phenom guys have smarted up and structured their inspection program in a way that it can be done on an annual basis, but what those inspections include is prescribed by the manufacturer.

For SE turboprops, the IA can technically just do an annual inspection with the minimums required by the FAA, he is not tied to a specific plan from pilatus. In reality, most PC12s and TBMs are maintained based on the manufacturers inspection plan to maintain resale value.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 06:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13077
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Yet another reason to own a single turboprop.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 08:01 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 23768
Post Likes: +7614
Location: Columbia, SC (KCUB)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
Citations? Pick a part any part and call to get a price. You'll find out quickly why Citations are so cheap to purchase.

_________________
Minister of Ice
Family Motto: If you aren't scared, you're not having fun!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 08:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/08
Posts: 2718
Post Likes: +100
Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
I know of a Citation II in decent shape with good hours left on the motors. It sold for $225,000.00! I suppose you can buy one, run it ragged, and then bury it in your backyard when you're done.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 09:02 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/26/10
Posts: 4296
Post Likes: +196
Location: West Palm Beach, FL (KLNA)
Aircraft: 1979 Duke B60
Username Protected wrote:
Citations? Pick a part any part and call to get a price. You'll find out quickly why Citations are so cheap to purchase.


If you're going to buy a cheap Citation, you're better off buying an extra one just for parts.. :crazy:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 09:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12130
Post Likes: +3031
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
Citations? Pick a part any part and call to get a price. You'll find out quickly why Citations are so cheap to purchase.


If you're going to buy a cheap Citation, you're better off buying an extra one just for parts.. :crazy:


I actually met a guy who did that. He tried to convince me I should go that route also. :D

Tim

Top

 Post subject: Re: Old Citations
PostPosted: 17 May 2013, 11:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 1569
Post Likes: +523
Location: Houston, TX USA
Aircraft: Learjet
The parts are not that bad. Much cheaper than the Eclipse, since you can usually call a dismantler and find a good serviceable used take off. The inspection program is not terrible either. If you manage the plane yourself, and are smart about it, they really aren't that bad. (I mean, don't go dropping it off at a Cessna factory service center and give them a blank check.)

The issue is the cost of the engines & lousy performance for the amount of fuel the burn. Those airplanes for $300k probably have 3400 hours on the engines, no RVSM ($$$$$ and without it burning lots more fuel), and are coming up on a Phase V.

I had a couple friends try to talk me into going on as a 1/3 partner on an old 501 SP before I found the Eclipse. The old Citations have a lot more room inside, but it the panels are antique and they burn 3-4 times the fuel. Fuel is by far my biggest expense already, so it just didn't make sense to me.

_________________
Destroyer of the world’s finest aircraft since 1985.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next



B-Kool

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.airmart-85x150.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tat-85x100.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.