03 May 2025, 09:04 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 11:35 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/26/10 Posts: 4296 Post Likes: +196 Location: West Palm Beach, FL (KLNA)
Aircraft: 1979 Duke B60
|
|
Username Protected wrote: newsflash.... we are not announcing bankruptcy ... today ... peons rejoice! That would be Beechcraft!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 12:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/20/09 Posts: 5260 Post Likes: +246
|
|
Most of the financing... huh? so the project will move forward to being 90% done before they cancel it again.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 13:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/08 Posts: 2718 Post Likes: +100 Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Seems really dumb to me BWTHDIK as the other VLJ have gone nowhere. Cessna was smart enough to know the mustang needed upgrading to the M2.Give me the Pipistrel with gear up, 200kts at 10gal/hr. Now there is innovation. Keep dreaming for pressurization... The M2 doesn't replace the Mustang. It replaces the CJ1.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 13:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The M2 doesn't replace the Mustang. It replaces the CJ1. Of which Cessna sold ever diminishing numbers the moment they added the bigger CJs on one hand and the Mustang on the other. Not sure the market niche is that big.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 13:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/08 Posts: 2718 Post Likes: +100 Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
|
|
Back on the subject of the Cirrus Jet.
The Extra 500 should be certified soon. That fills the price point at about $1.5 mil. With the Meridian selling around 30 units/yr. and TBM (@another $ million) with another 30 units/yr., there's not a lot of room to split that market.
It's a big bet for Cirrus to think they can build a brand new market niche.....that a new group of buyers would arrive and pass up existing, proven models just on the alure that it is really a "Jet".
Cirrus must really believe in their ability to grow sales in the emerging markets.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 14:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13077 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Back on the subject of the Cirrus Jet.
The Extra 500 should be certified soon. That fills the price point at about $1.5 mil. With the Meridian selling around 30 units/yr. and TBM (@another $ million) with another 30 units/yr., there's not a lot of room to split that market.
It's a big bet for Cirrus to think they can build a brand new market niche.....that a new group of buyers would arrive and pass up existing, proven models just on the alure that it is really a "Jet".
Cirrus must really believe in their ability to grow sales in the emerging markets. I like the Extra 500. That's a definite possibility for me if they ever get it done.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 14:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6060 Post Likes: +708 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Ive looked at the proposed numbers on Cirrus website. It burns more fuel than the TBM for the same speed and short 400 ibs for full fuel payload. There is 7 seats but I dont see many flight that you could fill these, it competes more with the Meridien than the TBM or Mustang. You can go fast but not far with not much in the cabin.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 14:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/18/07 Posts: 20815 Post Likes: +10019 Location: W Michigan
Aircraft: Ex PA22, P28R, V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I just don't see the fascination with small jets. They are too small, limited range, not efficient to operate and astronomical cost to maintain. That doesn't bother some folks; there is a "cool" factor, especially with the V-tail But I'd be surprised there would enough buyers to make this a sustained success.
_________________ Stop Continental Drift.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 14:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/23/11 Posts: 74 Post Likes: +39 Location: KLQK Upstate South Carolina
Aircraft: Bonanza 35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For anyone with a classical education:
Mons parturibat, gemitus immanes ciens, eratque in terris maxima expectatio. At ille murem peperit. Hoc scriptum est tibi, qui, magna cum minaris, extricas nihil. (Aesops fables, book IV)  And maybe for those who aren't classicaly educated: The Mountain in Labor (trans. C. Smart) The Mountain labor'd, groaning loud, On which a num'rous gaping crowd Of noodles came to see the sight, When, lo ! a mouse was brought to light! This tale 's for men of swagg'ring cast, Whose threats, voluminous and vast, With all their verse and all their prose, Can make but little on 't, God knows.
_________________ Who signs the front of the check does the talking and who signs the back does the listening!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 14:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Cirrus must really believe in their ability to grow sales in the emerging markets. Don't misunderestimate Cirrus. Since 2002, they singlehandedly created a market for 4-seat plastic singles and brought a good number of new drivers into the market. With a compelling product, they may be able to bring new entrants into GA. There are good reasons to go to a SE jet, dirt simple to operate (one switch, one lever), low DOC, easier to fly than a TP or twin, low risk of FOD....
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus Posted: 18 Apr 2012, 15:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/18/10 Posts: 456 Post Likes: +114 Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ive looked at the proposed numbers on Cirrus website. It burns more fuel than the TBM for the same speed and short 400 ibs for full fuel payload. There is 7 seats but I dont see many flight that you could fill these, it competes more with the Meridien than the TBM or Mustang. You can go fast but not far with not much in the cabin. This is my problem with all of Cirrus, great aircraft if you want to fly yourself or one other. Not so great as a family travel vehicle. Given how well the SR-22 has done I somehow don't think it'll be a problem for the Jet.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|