03 May 2025, 08:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 06 Feb 2012, 17:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3541
Aircraft: C55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I agree with the summary A36=Pilots plane, PA32=passengers plane. While the PA32 feels wider in the cabin (and in fact is) the baggage space in the PA32 is not a huge leap ahead of the A36. Front baggage Pa32=100 LBS, Rear baggage PA32=100lbs. A36 between 1st and 2nd row Club seats, =90lbs, rear baggage A36=70lbs. Some difference not huge the speed and fuel economy of the A36 wins the day. Brian, The weight limitation is usually not the limiting factor; however, the volume is. The next time you take a trip actually weigh your cargo. You will most likely find that if you have a family of 4 going on a week or two vacation that your baggage will be less than 150 lbs. We always run out of room before we run out of maximum placarded baggage weight. You should not have to put baggage on the floor of your airplane IMO.
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 06 Feb 2012, 17:23 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3541
Aircraft: C55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have over 100 hours in a Straight tail Piper Lance, a precursor to the Saratoga. If I had a choice, I would pick a Beech.... There is a world of difference in how a beech handles....compared to a Lance. Babar, I won't argue that a Piper is better than Beech because it is not; however, you can't compare the Lance to a Toga. The Toga's wing is much better than the old Hershey Bar wing.
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 06 Feb 2012, 17:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3541
Aircraft: C55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm still stuck on the tail wagging comment. I think you've got our straight tails confused with the v tails.  Yea, the only thing worse than a Vtail is a Duke.
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 06 Feb 2012, 17:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 1506 Post Likes: +83 Location: 2R2 - Indy / KEET - Shelby County, AL / KMEI - Meridian, MS
Aircraft: Baron C55, Bo A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have over 100 hours in a Straight tail Piper Lance, a precursor to the Saratoga. If I had a choice, I would pick a Beech.... There is a world of difference in how a beech handles....compared to a Lance. Babar, I won't argue that a Piper is better than Beech because it is not; however, you can't compare the Lance to a Toga. The Toga's wing is much better than the old Hershey Bar wing.
Oh, and I forgot to mention: when flying a Lance/Toga, carry a block of cement.... in case your engine quits, throw the cement block out....that is your glide ratio....ask me how I know
...Babar.
_________________ ...Babar. User 716
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 06 Feb 2012, 18:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just treat it like an autorotation. Look past your feet to the ground and decide whether you like the spot, because that is where you are going to land. I've flown a Hershey bar Six with 5 good sized adults and full tanks before. The transition from level flight to autorotation mode is quite impressive.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 09 Feb 2012, 14:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/02/10 Posts: 7536 Post Likes: +4936 Company: Inscrutable Fasteners, LLC Location: West Palm Beach - F45
Aircraft: Planeless
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just treat it like an autorotation. Look past your feet to the ground and decide whether you like the spot, because that is where you are going to land. I've flown a Hershey bar Six with 5 good sized adults and full tanks before. The transition from level flight to autorotation mode is quite impressive.
Arrows with the straight chord wing were the same way. I have a lot of time in both IIs and IIIs and the difference was significant.
I LOVE Pipers (well, all airplanes, really), but I never understood their plan. They stopped making the Dakota in 1994. Cessna didn't make a new 182 until 1997. Piper ceeded that entire market slot to Cessna without even a fight.
Best, Rich
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 09 Feb 2012, 17:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13077 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm still stuck on the tail wagging comment. I think you've got our straight tails confused with the v tails.  +1 I didn't know I had a tail wag issue.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 09 Feb 2012, 18:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I LOVE Pipers (well, all airplanes, really), but I never understood their plan. They stopped making the Dakota in 1994. Cessna didn't make a new 182 until 1997. Piper ceeded that entire market slot to Cessna without even a fight.
I really dont understand their model politics either. They have ceded EVERYTHING to Cessna. At this point, the only PA28 variants they are selling is the tricked out Archer LX for 320k  and the Arrow for 414k. Both are special order items, unless you order 10 or 15 at a time, they are not going to sell them to you. When they started doing that with the Warrior, they were down to a single customer (the University of North Dakota) pretty soon. At some point, even UND was sick of the games and switched to 172s for their trainer fleet. To maximize their production expenses, the Archer is delivered with a G500 and the Arrow with Avidyne Entegra, also both use different engines. Now, their main customer are the large puppy-mills, why would they be interested to start their students on either G500 in the Archer, G1000 in the 172 and switch them to the archaic Avidyne panel for complex/commercial/CFI training ? There should be a way to push down production cost by getting the wings riveted together in India or something. And if you look at the prices used Dakotas command, you really have to wonder why they didn't bring back that model back in the little 'boomlet' in GA during the early 2000s. It is a real 4 adults full fuel aircraft. Maybe some lightweight updates, fuel injected engine and priced below the Cirrus and Cessna offerings......
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 09 Feb 2012, 22:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/02/10 Posts: 7536 Post Likes: +4936 Company: Inscrutable Fasteners, LLC Location: West Palm Beach - F45
Aircraft: Planeless
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I LOVE Pipers (well, all airplanes, really), but I never understood their plan. They stopped making the Dakota in 1994. Cessna didn't make a new 182 until 1997. Piper ceeded that entire market slot to Cessna without even a fight.
I really dont understand their model politics either. They have ceded EVERYTHING to Cessna. At this point, the only PA28 variants they are selling is the tricked out Archer LX for 320k  and the Arrow for 414k. Both are special order items, unless you order 10 or 15 at a time, they are not going to sell them to you. When they started doing that with the Warrior, they were down to a single customer (the University of North Dakota) pretty soon. At some point, even UND was sick of the games and switched to 172s for their trainer fleet. To maximize their production expenses, the Archer is delivered with a G500 and the Arrow with Avidyne Entegra, also both use different engines. Now, their main customer are the large puppy-mills, why would they be interested to start their students on either G500 in the Archer, G1000 in the 172 and switch them to the archaic Avidyne panel for complex/commercial/CFI training ? There should be a way to push down production cost by getting the wings riveted together in India or something. And if you look at the prices used Dakotas command, you really have to wonder why they didn't bring back that model back in the little 'boomlet' in GA during the early 2000s. It is a real 4 adults full fuel aircraft. Maybe some lightweight updates, fuel injected engine and priced below the Cirrus and Cessna offerings......
Hi Florian,
I just don't know.
I, personally, would rather have a nice Dak than a 182, but that's me. They are darn near impossible to find. To people who have nice copies hang on to them, come hell or high water.
They were doing some neat stuff with LoPresti, getting some cleaned up airframes, and the little two seater they were working on, but that all fizzled out.
Best, Rich
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 09 Feb 2012, 22:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I, personally, would rather have a nice Dak than a 182, but that's me. Well, it's not just you, that's why they are so hard to find. Quote: They were doing some neat stuff with LoPresti, getting some cleaned up airframes, and the little two seater they were working on, but that all fizzled out. They put the lopresti mods on the Saratoga, Seneca and Archer III but never updated the Arrow. 414k and it looks vintage 1976  . A Dakota with lopresti mods and some further cleanup would be a 4 fat guy 150kt travel plane. But who could possibly need that ?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flew a Saratoga SP II HP Yesterday Posted: 11 Feb 2012, 14:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/22/10 Posts: 96
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I looked at a 2002 turbo Saratoga in my mechanics shop the other day. It had the new thinner wing and glass panel. Looked great.
I only have two words for anyone considering a piper product, parts availability! Sorry, that's just not true.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|