banner
banner

15 May 2025, 19:50 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2011, 22:05 
Offline

 Profile




Joined: 08/19/11
Posts: 3
Company: Soloy Aviation Solutions
Aircraft: A36
Interested in any and all comments in the viability of the Rolls-Royce 250 powered G36.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2011, 22:10 
Online



 Profile




Joined: 03/15/08
Posts: 3130
Post Likes: +875
Location: Loveland, CO
Aircraft: 35C-33
Did they build any? Tradewinds went broke about the time the G-36 came out.

The Allison A-36 has been discussed extensively here. BH


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2011, 22:12 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 10/26/08
Posts: 4627
Post Likes: +1031
Location: Pinehurst, NC (KSOP)
Aircraft: 1965 Bonanza S35
This is gonna be fun. :D

:popcorn: :popcorn:

_________________
dino

"TRUTH is AUTHORITY..... Authority is not Truth"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2011, 22:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13397
Post Likes: +7475
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
No pressurization-decreased utility
Range issue
Stink in the un-sealed cabin
Likely price tag puts you up against used/comparable cabin class singles
Frankenplanes have limited appeal

These are some points I remember from discussions regarding other turbine Bos in no particular order.

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2011, 23:26 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/29/09
Posts: 1770
Post Likes: +533
Location: KCRS
At 230KTAS I think the new factory supported G36TC will take care of any interest in the turbine conversion FrankenPlane.

I know turbines are cool, but not in an unpressurized single.

The new G36TC should be awesome.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2011, 23:40 
Offline

 Profile




Joined: 08/19/11
Posts: 3
Company: Soloy Aviation Solutions
Aircraft: A36
Tradewinds was unable to covnert G36 models becuase Garmin will not participate and they hold the cards.

The exhaust smell in the cabin can be minimized with sealing the wheelwells as shown on the original conversion drawings.

The costs may be reduced with the new RR500 engine.

What if Hawker was to participate?

Can't fix the lack of pressurization.

An STC done properly can be better than the OEM configuration, look at the Soloy MKII Cessna 206.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 00:57 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/30/08
Posts: 5604
Post Likes: +813
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: SR22
Guys; Mr. Stauffer is from, easily, the most reputable aftermarket turbine conversion company.

This could be a historic thread.
:popcorn:

_________________
TRUE-COURSE AVIATION INSURANCE - CA License 0G87202
alejandro@true-course.com
805.727.4510


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 05:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20200
Post Likes: +24838
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
.....not related to David...

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 08:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13079
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Guys; Mr. Stauffer is from, easily, the most reputable aftermarket turbine conversion company.

This could be a historic thread.
:popcorn:



In that case. He can convert mine. :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 09:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/14/08
Posts: 3133
Post Likes: +2672
Location: KGBR
Aircraft: D50
It'd be sad in way to see the current premiere piston single franken-chopped, especially when there are so many a36's that would have all the functionality with a g600.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 11:04 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/09
Posts: 4283
Post Likes: +2972
Company: To be announced
Aircraft: N/A
Why would you want spend all those AMUs and end up with a Bonanza that can back up on the ramp?

_________________
God created Aircraft Mechanics so Pilots could have heros.
I'd rather be fishing with Andy and Opie


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 11:34 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 7963
Post Likes: +3473
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
Username Protected wrote:
Why would you want spend all those AMUs and end up with a Bonanza that can back up on the ramp?


...you answered your own question!

_________________
PP, ASEL, Instrument Airplane, A&P
Texas Construction Law: http://www.TexasConstructionLaw.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 12:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/11/09
Posts: 1962
Post Likes: +300
Location: KSTJ
But aren't turbins more reliable? :stir:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 14:16 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/16/09
Posts: 7216
Post Likes: +2095
Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: BE-TBD
If you could bolt on an RR500 and get it to fully integrate to the G1000 I think you would have a winner. I guess the question is whether or not the sales numbers would support the program (obviously). There was a great write-up on here about the performance and real-world operations of a tradewinds turbine...let me see if i can find it.

_________________
AI generated post. Any misrepresentation, inaccuracies or omissions not attributable to member.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Turbine Powered G36
PostPosted: 29 Aug 2011, 14:20 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/16/09
Posts: 7216
Post Likes: +2095
Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: BE-TBD
found it. A G36 with the same engine is obviously going to be pretty much the same deal as described (except you would have nice integration to the avionics suite).

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=590&p=505479#p505479

Username Protected wrote:
I've owned a Tradewinds Bonanza for 6 years. The motor is an Allison 250 B17 F-2.
There are pluses and minuses to all aircraft this one included. My mission profile is typically VFR, under 500nm and in mountainous country. For my mission- it is the perfect airplane.

Much misinformation has been percolated around- mainly by people who really don't know what they are talking about.

I rarely take this aircraft into the flightlevels. In my opinion GA non pressurized aircraft all have rinky-dink O2 systems and anyone who takes one up to 25K (as the ads often brag about are foolish) Therefore- regardless of my turbine bo's capability to fly up to 25K - I never do- unless I find myself in an extremus situation. So to summarize: if you want to fly into the flight levels- get a pressurized plane.

So if the plane is not pressurized is there any reason to get a turbine? In my opinion for my mission- yes. In mountain airports I want to land slow (due to higher TAS/GS) - I want to get off the ground quickly and climb out fast. My turbine allows for all of that. Iam practically a STOL airplane- except I get 200kts every flight. I cruise climb around 140IAS and get 1200fpm fully loaded. Mid weight climbouts are well over 2500fpm @ 120IAS.

I typically fly between 10 and 18K. The best of all worlds is around 14-16K
On most days @ 16K I see the following performance:
Max Cont Pwr: 212-215 KTAS@ 26gph
Cruise 1: 205KTAS @ 23gph
cruise2: 200KTAS @ 22gph
cruise3: 190KTAS @ 20gph
cruise4: 180KTAS @ 18gph

For cooler days add 5 knots TAS to everything and add 1gph
warmer days- subtract 5 knots and subtract 1 gph

The fastest speed I ever saw occured on an exceptionally cool day (-20 ISO I believe) and that was 226KTAS. On a straight ISO day in mid teens I can hit the 220KTAS Tradewind Turbines advertises

I should note that while many owners fly their airplane @ max cont power all the time- I know far too much about turbine aircraft to do this with my own aircraft. I fly 50 deg C below max cont on all missions for engine life and general respect- this almost always yields me 200KTAS on 22gph. Iam happy and so is airplane.

Regarding lower mission profiles- its no big deal. If I have to fly low- I just fly low. My IAS and fuel flows stay exactly the same only my true airspeed decreases. These high efficiency turboprops are not turbojets. Down low- figure you will loose about 10% range.

Regarding range- I've already said most of my mission profiles are inside of 500nm. More than that and iam usually itching to stretch my legs or take a leak. The longest leg I ever flew was about 800nm with a very slight headwind- didn't land with much fuel- so I would call that the aircrafts max effective VFR range. I've had flights longer than 5hrs before and don't think I made it to the fbo before I started leaking- so again- not my thing to do long flights

For me this is the perfect mid teens airplane. As for the rocket engineering design- they've done a great job on the B36 model with a PT6 (and I think it even looks a little more "right") - and the aircraft has greater performance (by about 10%) - but the PT6 is a more high alt eng- not nearly as efficient as the allison in the mid teens and so those guys are driven more into filing IFR into the low-mid 20s - which goes back to my original premise- these planes are not designed for high altitude flight. Until they have a positive pressure military style oxy system they are unsafe flown at those altitudes- even then that's an iffy situation without pressuriztion. But either way- rockets plane flown high against the tradwind flown in mid teens- the tradewind wins handsdown in nm per gal. I have had 11 nm (true not wind assisted) per gallon of jet A with this aircraft. Name me another certified turboprop that gets that kind of performance.

Oh yeah- great ramp prescence- the G-4 guys get ignored and you get a crowd!

Let me know if you would like me to answer any questions!

Jim


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 



Aviation Fabricators (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.CiESVer2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.