02 Nov 2025, 21:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 20:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/04/08 Posts: 1799 Post Likes: +1404 Location: MYF, San Diego, CA
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If one really does some research he will find that the very best products were made in the USA from about 1946 to 1980. By 1980 the Japanese were catching up on quality manufacturing, and, at a cheaper price. Manufacturing flowed to Japan and other Asian countries for cheaper labor costs. As Japan and nearby countries prospered, the cost of labor increased greatly. The price of their goods went up, and up. This is normal economics. I came here in 1981. Maybe it's all my fault? But if you think the quality of cars decreased after 1980, you've driven cars very different from the ones I've driven. The Japanese hammered the US and European car-makers by consistently producing better quality cars in the 70s and early 80s. Not necessarily better designed or engineered, but they were better built. As a result of that competition, US cars have improved immeasurably. And what care you if you buy a Honda, a BMW or a Mercedes? Any one of them might have been made in the US. The profits are a very small part of the price you pay, and the shareholders could be US, Japanese, German, or Chilean. (I doubt this wil be true of the Chinese company buying Cirrus though.) I come from the UK. Rolls Royce, the company that powered Spitfires, is owned by a German company, but it's shareholders are all over. Jaguar was sold to an American company, and is now owned by a company from a different ex-colony  . The Indian company seems to be doing a better than either British Leyland or Ford. We shouldn't worry about old technologies changing hands. Worry more that we are not producing enough Qualcomms in the US - as the British should worry they are not producing enough ARM Holdings. It's sad that many will never have heard of those companies, which should be icons. Ashley
Last edited on 28 Feb 2011, 21:12, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 20:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I came here in 1981. Maybe it's all my fault? But if you think the quality of cars decreased after 1980, you've driven cars very different from the ones I've driven. The Japanese hammered the US and European car-makers by consistently producing better quality cars in the 70s and early 80s. Not necessarily better designed or engineered, but they were better built. As a result of that competition, US cars have improved immeasurably. And what care you if you buy a Honda, a BMW or a Mercedes? Any one of them might have been made in the US. The profits are a very small part of the price you pay, and the shareholders could be US, Japanese, German, or Chilean. (I doubt this wil be true of the Chinese company buying Cirrus though.) I come from the UK. Rolls Royce, the company that powered Spitfires, is owned by a German company, but it's shareholders are all over. Jaguar was sold to an American company, and is now owned by company from a different ex-colony  . The Indian company seems to be doing a better than either British Leyland or Ford. We shouldn't worry about old technologies changing hands. Worry more that we are not producing enough Qualcomms in the US - as the British should worry they are not producing enough ARM Holdings. It's sad that many will never have heard of those companies, which should be icons. Ashley I agree. But we are innovating here. Facebook is a great example. Robotics and other cost cutting measures are innovated here. There's a lot going on in the U.S. you just have to be in those industries to see it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/23/09 Posts: 12151 Post Likes: +11875 Location: Cascade, Idaho (U70)
Aircraft: 182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yeah..... you can fly em after they move to China but you'll be strangely unsatisfied in an hour and will want to fly something else. Hmmm. Maybe. But 99% of my flying enjoyment comes from "going somewhere". I don't go for turns in the pattern. If they can deliver good planes for a fraction of the cost now, they will save GA. That's really the bottom line.
Ahh Jason..... that was simply a twist on "i like chinese food but I'm hungry in an hour". Apparently I swung and missed....... strike one.
_________________ Life is for living. Backcountry videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSChxm ... fOnWwngH1w
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ahh Jason..... that was simply a twist on "i like chinese food but I'm hungry in an hour". Apparently I swung and missed....... strike one.
Not following
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The corollary to the US model actually winning and becoming the world standard is the globalization of the economy. A well run profitable enterprise will ideally recognize few borders.
My main worry vis a vie the Chinese situation is the often short sightedness of the CEO class.
The Chinese demand a stiff long-term price to play their game; you have to take the lid off of your technology and reveal all of the secrets that you may have spent decades developing.
The immediate pay off is obvious and huge. If you look no further than the next 20 quarters it looks like a good deal and the bottom line increases will be well reflected in the executive(s) compensation packages.
There will be a day of reckoning but that will be the next team's problem. I'm not following this either. Why would you need to take your lid off your technology to do business with China?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/26/08 Posts: 3169 Post Likes: +96 Company: FlyMo Arborists Location: Rochester Hills, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: C172M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ahh Jason..... that was simply a twist on "i like chinese food but I'm hungry in an hour". Apparently I swung and missed....... strike one.
Not following
It's a saying about Chinese food. Same thing with Taco Bell. It leaves you hungry an hour later.
_________________ ... with your penchant for virgins I'm bringing a dual yoke when we fly. -- J. Johnson
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's a saying about Chinese food. Same thing with Taco Bell. It leaves you hungry an hour later.
My whole life I've despised Chinese food. I'm just not familiar with that saying. But, with all the rice and salt in that stuff, why would it leave you hungry?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/08 Posts: 1257 Post Likes: +1155 Location: San Diego CA.
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The corollary to the US model actually winning and becoming the world standard is the globalization of the economy. A well run profitable enterprise will ideally recognize few borders.
My main worry vis a vie the Chinese situation is the often short sightedness of the CEO class.
The Chinese demand a stiff long-term price to play their game; you have to take the lid off of your technology and reveal all of the secrets that you may have spent decades developing.
The immediate pay off is obvious and huge. If you look no further than the next 20 quarters it looks like a good deal and the bottom line increases will be well reflected in the executive(s) compensation packages.
There will be a day of reckoning but that will be the next team's problem. I'm not following this either. Why would you need to take your lid off your technology to do business with China?
This has been Chinese industrial policy for quite a while.
It is just starting to bite. Japan won a contract to build bullet trains but had to reveal their technology. Now China has built their own train (Worlds fastest) by re-working the Japanese technology and claiming they "invented" it.
In all sectors, automotive, aviation, etc. the Chinese demand as a condition of building/selling in China that you reveal your technology. They have been doing this for quite a while and the results are just beginning to show.
I will be curious to see how much "indigenous advanced technology" makes its way onto China's Comac C919.
_________________ Member 184
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese Posted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/26/08 Posts: 3169 Post Likes: +96 Company: FlyMo Arborists Location: Rochester Hills, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: C172M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My whole life I've despised Chinese food. I'm just not familiar with that saying. But, with all the rice and salt in that stuff, why would it leave you hungry? Is there a dietician in the house?
_________________ ... with your penchant for virgins I'm bringing a dual yoke when we fly. -- J. Johnson
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|