banner
banner

02 Nov 2025, 21:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 19:25 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 10873
Post Likes: +2252
Company: MBG Properties
Location: Knoxville, TN (KDKX)
Aircraft: 1972 Bonanza V35B
It all boils down to the cost of labor. Raw materials' cost, R&D etc., are not the most expensive ingredients for making an airplane. Labor is #1.

Is the labor force at the HB plant in Mexico unionized? I would bet they are not.

Oh, BTW, am I prejudiced? Yes. Unions killed manufacturing in the USA.

(I know, I'm maybe stepping over the line toward politics but today I've got a burr under my saddle and feel like venting a bit.)

_________________
Max Grogan

Come fly with me.

My photos: https://photos.google.com/albums


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 19:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/26/08
Posts: 3169
Post Likes: +96
Company: FlyMo Arborists
Location: Rochester Hills, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: C172M
Let it out, Max. :D

_________________
... with your penchant for virgins I'm bringing a dual yoke when we fly. -- J. Johnson


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 20:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/04/08
Posts: 1799
Post Likes: +1404
Location: MYF, San Diego, CA
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
If one really does some research he will find that the very best products were made in the USA from about 1946 to 1980. By 1980 the Japanese were catching up on quality manufacturing, and, at a cheaper price. Manufacturing flowed to Japan and other Asian countries for cheaper labor costs. As Japan and nearby countries prospered, the cost of labor increased greatly. The price of their goods went up, and up. This is normal economics.


I came here in 1981. Maybe it's all my fault? But if you think the quality of cars decreased after 1980, you've driven cars very different from the ones I've driven. The Japanese hammered the US and European car-makers by consistently producing better quality cars in the 70s and early 80s. Not necessarily better designed or engineered, but they were better built. As a result of that competition, US cars have improved immeasurably. And what care you if you buy a Honda, a BMW or a Mercedes? Any one of them might have been made in the US. The profits are a very small part of the price you pay, and the shareholders could be US, Japanese, German, or Chilean. (I doubt this wil be true of the Chinese company buying Cirrus though.)

I come from the UK. Rolls Royce, the company that powered Spitfires, is owned by a German company, but it's shareholders are all over. Jaguar was sold to an American company, and is now owned by a company from a different ex-colony :D . The Indian company seems to be doing a better than either British Leyland or Ford.

We shouldn't worry about old technologies changing hands. Worry more that we are not producing enough Qualcomms in the US - as the British should worry they are not producing enough ARM Holdings. It's sad that many will never have heard of those companies, which should be icons.

Ashley


Last edited on 28 Feb 2011, 21:12, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 20:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I came here in 1981. Maybe it's all my fault? But if you think the quality of cars decreased after 1980, you've driven cars very different from the ones I've driven. The Japanese hammered the US and European car-makers by consistently producing better quality cars in the 70s and early 80s. Not necessarily better designed or engineered, but they were better built. As a result of that competition, US cars have improved immeasurably. And what care you if you buy a Honda, a BMW or a Mercedes? Any one of them might have been made in the US. The profits are a very small part of the price you pay, and the shareholders could be US, Japanese, German, or Chilean. (I doubt this wil be true of the Chinese company buying Cirrus though.)

I come from the UK. Rolls Royce, the company that powered Spitfires, is owned by a German company, but it's shareholders are all over. Jaguar was sold to an American company, and is now owned by company from a different ex-colony :D . The Indian company seems to be doing a better than either British Leyland or Ford.

We shouldn't worry about old technologies changing hands. Worry more that we are not producing enough Qualcomms in the US - as the British should worry they are not producing enough ARM Holdings. It's sad that many will never have heard of those companies, which should be icons.

Ashley



I agree.

But we are innovating here. Facebook is a great example. Robotics and other cost cutting measures are innovated here. There's a lot going on in the U.S. you just have to be in those industries to see it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/25/09
Posts: 1296
Post Likes: +88
Location: Nothern California (KSQL-KPAO-1O3)
The worst cars ever produced in this country were built around 1980, no question. I think the primary reason was tightening emissions standards combined with no appropriate technologies to meet them. Bosch made all the key breakthroughs, but by 1987 things were starting to work pretty well again in US cars. Mind you I'm talking design/function here, not assembly quality.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/30/08
Posts: 1257
Post Likes: +1155
Location: San Diego CA.
The corollary to the US model actually winning and becoming the world standard is the globalization of the economy. A well run profitable enterprise will ideally recognize few borders.

My main worry vis a vie the Chinese situation is the often short sightedness of the CEO class.

The Chinese demand a stiff long-term price to play their game; you have to take the lid off of your technology and reveal all of the secrets that you may have spent decades developing.

The immediate pay off is obvious and huge. If you look no further than the next 20 quarters it looks like a good deal and the bottom line increases will be well reflected in the executive(s) compensation packages.

There will be a day of reckoning but that will be the next team's problem.

_________________
Member 184


Last edited on 28 Feb 2011, 21:14, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/23/09
Posts: 12151
Post Likes: +11875
Location: Cascade, Idaho (U70)
Aircraft: 182
Username Protected wrote:
Yeah..... you can fly em after they move to China but you'll be strangely unsatisfied in an hour and will want to fly something else.



Hmmm. Maybe. But 99% of my flying enjoyment comes from "going somewhere". I don't go for turns in the pattern.

If they can deliver good planes for a fraction of the cost now, they will save GA. That's really the bottom line.


Ahh Jason..... that was simply a twist on "i like chinese food but I'm hungry in an hour". Apparently I swung and missed....... strike one.
_________________
Life is for living.
Backcountry videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSChxm ... fOnWwngH1w


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

Ahh Jason..... that was simply a twist on "i like chinese food but I'm hungry in an hour". Apparently I swung and missed....... strike one.


Not following


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
The corollary to the US model actually winning and becoming the world standard is the globalization of the economy. A well run profitable enterprise will ideally recognize few borders.

My main worry vis a vie the Chinese situation is the often short sightedness of the CEO class.

The Chinese demand a stiff long-term price to play their game; you have to take the lid off of your technology and reveal all of the secrets that you may have spent decades developing.

The immediate pay off is obvious and huge. If you look no further than the next 20 quarters it looks like a good deal and the bottom line increases will be well reflected in the executive(s) compensation packages.

There will be a day of reckoning but that will be the next team's problem.


I'm not following this either. Why would you need to take your lid off your technology to do business with China?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/26/08
Posts: 3169
Post Likes: +96
Company: FlyMo Arborists
Location: Rochester Hills, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: C172M
Username Protected wrote:

Ahh Jason..... that was simply a twist on "i like chinese food but I'm hungry in an hour". Apparently I swung and missed....... strike one.


Not following


It's a saying about Chinese food. Same thing with Taco Bell. It leaves you hungry an hour later.
_________________
... with your penchant for virgins I'm bringing a dual yoke when we fly. -- J. Johnson


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

It's a saying about Chinese food. Same thing with Taco Bell. It leaves you hungry an hour later.



My whole life I've despised Chinese food. I'm just not familiar with that saying. But, with all the rice and salt in that stuff, why would it leave you hungry?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/30/08
Posts: 1257
Post Likes: +1155
Location: San Diego CA.
Username Protected wrote:
The corollary to the US model actually winning and becoming the world standard is the globalization of the economy. A well run profitable enterprise will ideally recognize few borders.

My main worry vis a vie the Chinese situation is the often short sightedness of the CEO class.

The Chinese demand a stiff long-term price to play their game; you have to take the lid off of your technology and reveal all of the secrets that you may have spent decades developing.

The immediate pay off is obvious and huge. If you look no further than the next 20 quarters it looks like a good deal and the bottom line increases will be well reflected in the executive(s) compensation packages.

There will be a day of reckoning but that will be the next team's problem.


I'm not following this either. Why would you need to take your lid off your technology to do business with China?


This has been Chinese industrial policy for quite a while.

It is just starting to bite. Japan won a contract to build bullet trains but had to reveal their technology. Now China has built their own train (Worlds fastest) by re-working the Japanese technology and claiming they "invented" it.

In all sectors, automotive, aviation, etc. the Chinese demand as a condition of building/selling in China that you reveal your technology. They have been doing this for quite a while and the results are just beginning to show.

I will be curious to see how much "indigenous advanced technology" makes its way onto China's Comac C919.
_________________
Member 184


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
I'm a manufacturer in the U.S. If you remove labor from the equation and automate, the Chinese got nothin' on you.

But it does make sense that if you want the Chinese to manufacture your product that they would need to know how to build it. Right?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/30/08
Posts: 1257
Post Likes: +1155
Location: San Diego CA.
Your supposition is correct but that is not what I said.

If you want to be able to build your product for China you have to let them look under the hood.

_________________
Member 184


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus sold to Chinese
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2011, 21:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/26/08
Posts: 3169
Post Likes: +96
Company: FlyMo Arborists
Location: Rochester Hills, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: C172M
Username Protected wrote:

My whole life I've despised Chinese food. I'm just not familiar with that saying. But, with all the rice and salt in that stuff, why would it leave you hungry?


:shrug: :D

Is there a dietician in the house?

_________________
... with your penchant for virgins I'm bringing a dual yoke when we fly. -- J. Johnson


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next



Plane AC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.tat-85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.