24 May 2025, 04:50 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 12:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20203 Post Likes: +24867 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think it was a pretty smart move by Piper to put the G500 into the plane to bring the price down from 'outright insane' to 'somewhat less than outright insane'. ... $300,000 for the privilege to own a new plane that carries 2 or 2.5 people at 120 kts.... Hopefully, the G500 is really really pretty.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 13:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Florian, autopilot is the Stec 55x. Neat. Sounds like a good package. Quote: Arlen, not my place to defend or disparage someone financial decisions but everyone is in a different financial place and has different desires and needs. The Archer is a perfect first plane to learn to fly in however and the owner of the G36 that I fly around in bought a 1999 Archer brand new to learn to fly in as well. It served him well for 7 years before moving up to the G36. It is no different from paying $600+k to buy a new G36 that carries less and is no faster than a 1984 model retrofitted with a G600, 530W , dolled up interior and Stec55x. Still, I don't begrudge anyone who makes that decision for himself. There are people who buy new aircraft and people who buy used aircraft. The latter group needs the former for their supply. The new Archers are btw. about 10kts faster than the old ones (LoPresti cowling, some fairing cleanup, no ADF antenna). As you are still in the break-in period, you'll have a chance to run the plane at 75% all the way through and should be able to get some meaningful numbers over the long distance travelled. UL is 870lbs, with full tanks that is 3 200lb lard-asses in the cabin. If you really need to fill 4 seats, you fill the tanks to the tabs (17gal) each to gain 80lbs. Show me the new <200hp aircraft that does any better. I personally think they should bring the Dakota back, with a similar avionics package and cleanup. But wthdik.
Last edited on 23 Mar 2010, 13:40, edited 3 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 13:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20203 Post Likes: +24867 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
Arlen, not my place to defend or disparage someone financial decisions but everyone is in a different financial place and has different desires and needs. The Archer is a perfect first plane to learn to fly in however and the owner of the G36 that I fly around in bought a 1999 Archer brand new to learn to fly in as well. It served him well for 7 years before moving up to the G36.
-Neal Neal, You're absolutely right; that was my own personal bias coming through....based on my own situation.....didn't mean to sound so judgmental. I bought a new plane once; I suppose it's kinda like buying a new car ----> if you can afford it and it's what you want and you don't mind the big depreciation hit, then it's good. BTW, I wouldn't buy another new plane.....but that's just me.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 13:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It is no different from paying $600+k to buy a new G36 that carries less and is no faster than a 1984 model retrofitted with a G600, 530W , dolled up interior and Stec55x. Still, I don't begrudge anyone who makes that decision for himself.
IMHO, had I bought a 1984 model in 2008 when I bought my 2008 model, I'd have lost more money on the 1984 model as of today than my 2008 model.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 14:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hey Jason - I'm not trying to bait you with this question, but I'd love the see the numbers associated with that comparison, if you're willing to share.  Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying this applies to TODAY. Prices on all planes have dropped significantly in the last 2 years. I don't know what will happen in the next 2 years. Early 2000 M.Y. airplanes were asking $500K to $550K in 2008. Now they're asking in the low 3's and there are a lot of them and I don't see them selling. I'm sure you got a deal on your Bo compared to what the asking price would've been 2 years ago on it. Do you understand what I'm saying? I'm not saying that what I experienced in the last 2 years is what one will experience in the next 2 years. Buying a 2010 Bo now for example is probably not a better deal than buying an older one now. Prices have dropped a lot compared to when I was looking. Buying a 6 pack Bo when I was looking was saving me not even $50K over a G36. That's why I bought a G36.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 14:43 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 11/27/07 Posts: 4266 Post Likes: +1504 Company: BeechTalk Location: Pontiac, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: 1991 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Early 2000 M.Y. airplanes were asking $500K to $550K in 2008. Now they're asking in the low 3's and there are a lot of them and I don't see them selling. Yeah, I understand what you're saying. But, to complete the thought, you're seeing an early 2000 A36 listed for $150-200K less than two years ago, so what would you expect your 2008 to have depreciated in those two years from the time your bought until today (not counting your TAT upgrade, etc.)? Honest question.
_________________ CFI/CFII/MEI/ATP CE-560XL Type
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 16:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Early 2000 M.Y. airplanes were asking $500K to $550K in 2008. Now they're asking in the low 3's and there are a lot of them and I don't see them selling. Yeah, I understand what you're saying. But, to complete the thought, you're seeing an early 2000 A36 listed for $150-200K less than two years ago, so what would you expect your 2008 to have depreciated in those two years from the time your bought until today (not counting your TAT upgrade, etc.)? Honest question.
That's a great question I don't really know. Keep in mind that Beech isn't building my airplane right now either.
I would knock mine down low if there were some for sale. There's 1 2008 model on Controller. A 2009 and a 2010 is the exact same airplane but none for sale.
There definitely aren't any WAAS equipped G36's for sale that also have the TAT works on them. So, I don't know. Could mine be duplicated for less than what I have in it? I don't know.
Bottom line, had I bought a 2004 in 2008 I'd have already lost a lot more than I have on my 2008 now that were here in 2010.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Archer Delivery Flight Today Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 19:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 381 Post Likes: +22 Company: prime concrete const. Location: virginia beach, virginia
Aircraft: be-33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: yea, take some pics and post if not too busy. An archer is a nice stepping stone to the bonanza (if the new owner is listening).  an archer was my stepping stone to my bonanza.nice airplanes. but,i would never go back......
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|