banner
banner

17 Dec 2025, 14:33 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 18:41 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20842
Post Likes: +26315
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I would love a 501, but for me it would cost more.

Individual circumstances can greatly affect results.

At KSMQ, the runway is 2739 ft and makes a jet less practical.

It should be noted that jet runway numbers include engine failure on takeoff and 50 ft TCH on landing, so they are conservative. Ground run is typically about 1000 ft shorter than the book numbers. The TBM numbers do not include engine failure, of course. The numbers are thus apples to oranges in some ways.

Quote:
Add in additional training every year and it costs quite a bit more.

How much do you spend on training for the TBM? Do you use a sim?

My upcoming 61.58 + SPE is $9K at Flightsafety, the SPE adds about $3K to the price, so a 501 would be less.

Quote:
My maint experience has been very different than others. I maintain it myself and have averaged maybe $4K a year in parts. 7 weeks total man hours spent in the last 3 years doing maint, and that includes 10 year gear inspection. I did spend $5k the first year for special tooling.

You are doing far more on your TBM than I do on my Citation. You could, of course, apply a similar level of involvement on a Citation. If you get on a LUMP, then you basically go 3 years between inspections, and there is no 10 year gear inspection, either, so a lot less time in the shop.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 18:45 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/10/14
Posts: 1807
Post Likes: +881
Location: Northwest Arkansas (KVBT)
Aircraft: TBM850
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
Add in additional training every year and it costs quite a bit more.

How much do you spend on training for the TBM? Do you use a sim?

My upcoming 61.58 + SPE is $9K at Flightsafety, the SPE adds about $3K to the price, so a 501 would be less.

Typical is about $4000-4500 for an annual recurrent, same whether at SimCom or in aircraft (though the latter adds fuel/op costs).


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 19:04 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8699
Post Likes: +11290
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
Chip what’s the acquisition cost of a Mustang?

$1.5-2.5M.

It is a lot of money for an airplane isolated in its own small ecosystem, shares virtually nothing with 500 or 525 series.

Mike C.


There are 453 Mustangs… far more than Citation V / Ultra

Who cares if they don’t share anything with other types, we simply don’t have any issues getting them economically maintained.

You think this way because you are use to old / complex airplanes that need lots of parts!
_________________
Recent acquisitions - 2021 TBM 910 - 2013 Citation Mustang - 2022 Citation M2Gen2


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 19:37 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 10327
Post Likes: +4951
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
How much do you spend on training for the TBM? Do you use a sim


I've been doing in plane recurrents in FL, about $3k including fuel


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 20:37 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20842
Post Likes: +26315
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
There are 453 Mustangs… far more than Citation V / Ultra

Of the 540 V and Ultra made, I expect at least 400 are still flying, so your statement that the Mustang is "far more" seems misleading.

The parts commonality among 500 and 525 series is quite high, and there are many thousands of those. I've used parts from a 500, a 550, a Bravo, an Ultra, and a CJ on my plane. Ample supply.

Quote:
Who cares if they don’t share anything with other types, we simply don’t have any issues getting them economically maintained.

Being a unicorn among Citations makes them vulnerable to unique part problems. The lack of part commonality with the other small cabin Citations is one of the reasons Cessna stopped making them.

Quote:
You think this way because you are use to old / complex airplanes that need lots of parts!

All planes need parts. The new and used parts inventory for Mustangs is limited.

My plane is simpler than newer ones. I'll never be AOG for a FADEC fault, for example.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 20:38 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20842
Post Likes: +26315
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I've been doing in plane recurrents in FL, about $3k including fuel

I take it the travel cost from NJ to FL is not considered in that figure?

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 22:19 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5316
Post Likes: +5302
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
You just do a hot section and keep going to answer your question. There's no debate here. PM me and I'll give you an introduction. As long as nothing is trashed in your engine, you'll get out of this for Bonanza overhaul costs.


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2025, 22:38 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 10327
Post Likes: +4951
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
I've been doing in plane recurrents in FL, about $3k including fuel

I take it the travel cost from NJ to FL is not considered in that figure?

Mike C.


It's not

Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2025, 01:55 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14440
Post Likes: +9564
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
Typical is about $4000-4500 for an annual recurrent, same whether at SimCom or in aircraft (though the latter adds fuel/op costs).


SimCom just got bought by CAE and the prices have gone up a lot. PC12 recurrent this year for me is $6700. I think the TBM is the same.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2025, 07:15 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 10327
Post Likes: +4951
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
Typical is about $4000-4500 for an annual recurrent, same whether at SimCom or in aircraft (though the latter adds fuel/op costs).


SimCom just got bought by CAE and the prices have gone up a lot. PC12 recurrent this year for me is $6700. I think the TBM is the same.


Yikes. It was $4140 3 years ago

Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2025, 09:33 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20842
Post Likes: +26315
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Yikes. It was $4140 3 years ago

Is Simcom the only TBM sim choice?

Lack of competition can lead to high prices.

Simcom is the only choice for MU2 (and that's fixed base FTDs, not sims).

CE-500 choices are more numerous, Flightsafety, Simcom, CAE, Loft, RTC, etc.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2025, 10:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/06/14
Posts: 4144
Post Likes: +2858
Location: MA
Aircraft: C340A; TBM850
Username Protected wrote:
Is Simcom the only TBM sim choice?

Lack of competition can lead to high prices.

Simcom is the only choice for MU2 (and that's fixed base FTDs, not sims).

No. Simcom is the manufacturer anointed official sim trainer. I did my initial at EFT in SC. Underwriter accepted it. I don't recall the prices, but I think it was half the price or less, with fewer days. Not sure if there are any other sources for sim training, but there are plenty of different ways to get in-aircraft training. EFT was also a fixed FTD, SimCom's may be as well, not sure.

I wouldn't have been prepared to fly the plane without the 25 hours of dual that I did after the sim initial. We did plenty of emergency procedures and approaches, but not so much on the basic operation of the turbine, which was the new part for me. Or if we did, it didn't really stick until I flew the actual plane.


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2025, 10:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/07/11
Posts: 866
Post Likes: +489
Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
Username Protected wrote:
Yikes. It was $4140 3 years ago


CE-500 choices are more numerous, Flightsafety, Simcom, CAE, Loft, RTC, etc.


Do you happen to know if any of them have sims with panels that swap out so you can train with glass panels and not just the OEM setup? I'm pretty sure Redbird has panels you can load in and out to match what you have, but wasn't sure if that's also possible for Turbine sims?

Chip-

Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2025, 11:02 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7764
Post Likes: +5125
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
My strong suspicion is monopoly pricing… they control the overhaul ecosystem.

And you have two of them on the Piaggio.

Yes, not super stoked about that! Got an STC’d replacement you can suggest? ;)
_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2025, 12:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2084
Post Likes: +2190
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
At least hot and continue is an option. If one does that and then u assume a 1mm at the next cycle, the cost per hour really isn’t that bad.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.AAI.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Carolina Aircraft 85x50.jpg.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.camguard.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.