22 Oct 2025, 08:54 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: OA-1K Skyraider Posted: 11 Jun 2025, 22:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 118 Post Likes: +128
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
John: crazy, right? Euro-NATO has kept the "old" syllabus, since the partner nations won't sign up for that. Martin: yes, the T-1's are gone. Terry: if your IP was letting you land 5'-6' from #1, then he was doing it wrong. As for the Vance mishap, here's the mishap report: https://www.afjag.af.mil/portals/77/aib ... 1march.pdfWhat I believe you are referencing is the last paragraph on Page 3. Despite what it says there, the T-38 "training and techniques" manual doesn't state that. Now keep in mind, the C-model version of that manual has deleted most references to Wing Landings. But the A-model version didn't get all of the edits done yet. Here's what it states: "Attempt to stabilize at a given spacing in the 10 to 50-foot range. Focus on lead as the primary reference for the wing landing. Cross check the runway on final to ensure proper alignment, and then fly the proper position off of lead throughout the flare and touchdown." So were there IP's teaching to line up on your half of the runway... or do your own landing once in the flare? Absolutely. I have seen plenty of pilots chicken out on wing landings over the years. But, irrespective of what that report states and what you may have heard, I have never seen that in written guidance. So no... the USAF did NOT officially change anything. In my Wing, most formations recover to Initial. We have a "drag" procedure that many use, but I avoid using it. I prefer a formation approach with a formation go around, and then sequential closed... mainly to just keep my formation approach skills from getting too rusty.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: OA-1K Skyraider Posted: 12 Jun 2025, 16:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/30/22 Posts: 2572 Post Likes: +1514 Location: 0W3
Aircraft: Mooney 252/Encore
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Terry: if your IP was letting you land 5'-6' from #1, then he was doing it wrong. As for the Vance mishap, here's the mishap report: https://www.afjag.af.mil/portals/77/aib ... 1march.pdfWhat I believe you are referencing is the last paragraph on Page 3. Despite what it says there, the T-38 "training and techniques" manual doesn't state that. Now keep in mind, the C-model version of that manual has deleted most references to Wing Landings. But the A-model version didn't get all of the edits done yet. Here's what it states: "Attempt to stabilize at a given spacing in the 10 to 50-foot range. Focus on lead as the primary reference for the wing landing. Cross check the runway on final to ensure proper alignment, and then fly the proper position off of lead throughout the flare and touchdown." So were there IP's teaching to line up on your half of the runway... or do your own landing once in the flare? Absolutely. I have seen plenty of pilots chicken out on wing landings over the years. But, irrespective of what that report states and what you may have heard, I have never seen that in written guidance. So no... the USAF did NOT officially change anything. In my Wing, most formations recover to Initial. We have a "drag" procedure that many use, but I avoid using it. I prefer a formation approach with a formation go around, and then sequential closed... mainly to just keep my formation approach skills from getting too rusty. I don't remember spacing out very far at all. But that could be because it was a long time ago. I remember stacking level, one check make sure lead wasn't putting you in the dirt and then referencing lead until wheels touchdown. But I am SURE that there was no 50 foot spacing. I have to look and see what manuals I have and if I have the T-38 formation one.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: OA-1K Skyraider Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 02:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/22/16 Posts: 595 Post Likes: +717
|
|
[quote="Jon Huggins"] Attachment: IMG_5359.jpeg A few comments: We did wing landings for proficiency with the Phantom as you described Jon:
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: OA-1K Skyraider Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 06:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/02/11 Posts: 1934 Post Likes: +2437 Location: N Alabama
Aircraft: 1968 B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: John: crazy, right? Euro-NATO has kept the "old" syllabus, since the partner nations won't sign up for that.
Martin: yes, the T-1's are gone.
I see T-1s working the pattern at KHSV almost daily, coming from Columbus AFB. Not sure whose they are, but someone in the USAF is still flying them.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|