14 Jun 2025, 05:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206  Posted: 08 May 2025, 10:48 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 9154
Post Likes: +6897
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 182 on barnstormers with 550 claims 170 knots? not sure i believe that  Not even 170 mph. No way. What I would believe is that he has a problem in his pitot-static system or a broken ASI.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 08 May 2025, 11:16 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/25/22
Posts: 393
Post Likes: +583
Location: KLFT
Aircraft: 1981 T210N
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 182 on barnstormers with 550 claims 170 knots? not sure i believe that Not even 170 mph. No way. What I would believe is that he has a problem in his pitot-static system or a broken ASI.
I'd buy 170mph. That is just 147kts. At 8000', my 182-S (IO-540, 238hp) would make 142kts with full fuel and two in the cabin, and heavy shooting gear. It would make 145kts at 11,000 in cooler months. I could see a IO-550 pulling it along at 147kts.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 08 May 2025, 11:25 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/17/15
Posts: 160
Post Likes: +196
Location: KPVU, Provo, UT
Aircraft: C182
|
|
Attachment: IMG_0479.jpeg Here's a pic of my C182 doing 148 KTAS, admittedly on a cold day and at 13,000’. Also a VERY nice tailwind that day! Wish I wasn't inverted, can someone help with tihis? If you click on the pic it comes up correctly, for me at least! CT
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 14 May 2025, 13:17 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/10/13
Posts: 1252
Post Likes: +520
Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
|
|
|
anyone have any info on the 182 on aircraft bidder
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 20 May 2025, 18:20 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/29/12
Posts: 670
Post Likes: +261
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have an IO-550 C182Q that routinely sees 150 KTAS operating LOP around 14.5 gph, I’ve seen 160 KTAS ROP at 17.5 gph
Here at 5,500 msl at 156 KTAS and 14.2 gph at Basically 24 squared Do you have Gami´s? Rgs Patrick
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 20 May 2025, 22:25 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/17
Posts: 670
Post Likes: +317
Location: KVNC / KMKC
Aircraft: C182Q IO-550
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have an IO-550 C182Q that routinely sees 150 KTAS operating LOP around 14.5 gph, I’ve seen 160 KTAS ROP at 17.5 gph
Here at 5,500 msl at 156 KTAS and 14.2 gph at Basically 24 squared Do you have Gami´s? Rgs Patrick
_________________
Luck is where PREPARATION meets OPPORTUNITY
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 21 May 2025, 08:18 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 11/11/14
Posts: 41
Post Likes: +31
Location: 7TX4 - Hillcrest / Ft. Worth TX
Aircraft: C182QS, EA-200
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 182 on barnstormers with 550 claims 170 knots? not sure i believe that That’s a unique beast, it’s a 310HP 550 on a newer C182T body. The standard 182T’s are in the 150-155 (the turbos).. so 170 isn’t impossible on the perfect day, but I agree it’s probably a stretch.. I’m thinking this is a 160/65 knot airplane under most conditions.. My 470/TS powered 182 hangs between 151-156 knots TAS pretty comfy. I’m still looking for a faster 470 powered 182..
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 21 May 2025, 08:54 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 02/27/08
Posts: 3397
Post Likes: +1458
Location: Galveston, TX
Aircraft: Malibu PA46-310P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Bill my guess is it is mere semantics, what you call a 337 we call an engineering order. When I saw "gear saddles" and "337" in the same sentence my mind went in a third direction. That was one of the annoying things about trying to find information for an old Skymaster using Google - searching for "337" + any aviation term was just about useless.
Same issue when I search for Turbine Inlet Temps as an abbreviation.
Last edited on 21 May 2025, 19:09, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 21 May 2025, 18:02 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/29/12
Posts: 670
Post Likes: +261
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 182 on barnstormers with 550 claims 170 knots? not sure i believe that That’s a unique beast, it’s a 310HP 550 on a newer C182T body. The standard 182T’s are in the 150-155 (the turbos).. so 170 isn’t impossible on the perfect day, but I agree it’s probably a stretch.. I’m thinking this is a 160/65 knot airplane under most conditions.. My 470/TS powered 182 hangs between 151-156 knots TAS pretty comfy. I’m still looking for a faster 470 powered 182..
Are you running LOP at that fuel flow?
Rgs,
Patrick
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 11 Jun 2025, 12:21 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/10/13
Posts: 1252
Post Likes: +520
Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
|
|
|
how much penalty if no wheel fairings, i operate off a grass strip so probably would take them off
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 12 Jun 2025, 12:29 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8339
Post Likes: +10524
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 182 on barnstormers with 550 claims 170 knots? not sure i believe that That’s a unique beast, it’s a 310HP 550 on a newer C182T body. The standard 182T’s are in the 150-155 (the turbos).. so 170 isn’t impossible on the perfect day, but I agree it’s probably a stretch.. I’m thinking this is a 160/65 knot airplane under most conditions.. My 470/TS powered 182 hangs between 151-156 knots TAS pretty comfy. I’m still looking for a faster 470 powered 182..
Steve Knopp, developer and owner of Pponk, showed the data on one of his 182's at 165 knots on his website. I have a 520 in my 182 with all the airframe speed mods and get 165 knots TAS on 17.5 GPH ROP, but never fly it that way because of the furl burn. I cruise at 150 kts TAS at 13.5 GPH ROP. The power is there for takeoff and climb, but a big waste of fuel to go fast. If you want to go fast on lower fuel burns, get a Bonanza 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 12 Jun 2025, 15:34 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4872
Post Likes: +5512
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: how much penalty if no wheel fairings, i operate off a grass strip so probably would take them off IIRC, my '75 206 POH said there was a 7 mph penalty at 75%. At lower power settings the penalty was less. '75 was the first year with the improved streamlined pants so earlier years will be affected less.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|
