banner
banner

10 May 2025, 07:21 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 2017 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 02 May 2025, 14:38 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/15/22
Posts: 20
Post Likes: +1
Username Protected wrote:
I think we may actually be saying the same thing. The 200 kt climb schedule I was referencing starts out with 200 kts in the initial climb but then decreases significantly as you gain altitude. In the high 30’s, the indicated is something like 135 kts depending on weight.

I prefer the cruise climb approach by maintaining 160 kts indicated. My climb rate slows down as I go higher but my TAS increases.

Much better approach, IMO, for all of the reasons you mentioned.



hmmm I think it doesnt get that slow up high, at least as I recall it. I believe it's 200 in a tailwind condition and you subtract 5kts per 5,000ft. So that puts you at 170 at cruise, give or take?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 02 May 2025, 15:27 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5709
Post Likes: +7031
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
The 560 series climb schedule calls for 250knots till .62mach, then maintain .62 till cruise. This works well unless its hot and heavy, then I will decrease to .60 if needed. It's been a while since I flew a 501, but I would imagine they would be maybe 40-50 knots below that?

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 02 May 2025, 22:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/26/14
Posts: 1659
Post Likes: +657
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Aircraft: Dreaming
You guys are right I was mixing up the max climb vs cruise climb. Both attached here for reference.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 11:04 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/20
Posts: 1610
Post Likes: +1681
Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
Username Protected wrote:
You guys are right I was mixing up the max climb vs cruise climb. Both attached here for reference.

Thanks for posting. I use the cruise climb table but I start at 200KIAS, hold that until FL200, and then decrease per the chart.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 14:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1904
Post Likes: +1561
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
I use the 200KIAS Cruise Climb table almost exclusively.

Attachment:
200kias CC.jpg


My plane will follow that table pretty well by itself with no pitch changes from me. Furthermore, I find that that setting the TO power at 93.9% N1 gives the same results...I don't have to touch the power levers until well into the 30's.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 14:08 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/15/22
Posts: 20
Post Likes: +1
Username Protected wrote:
I use the 200KIAS Cruise Climb table almost exclusively.

Attachment:
200kias CC.jpg


My plane will follow that table pretty well by itself with no pitch changes from me. Furthermore, I find that that setting the TO power at 93.9% N1 gives the same results...I don't have to touch the power levers until well into the 30's.


Thanks for sharing. I believe that is the anti-ice on chart, right?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 14:15 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1904
Post Likes: +1561
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
I use the 200KIAS Cruise Climb table almost exclusively.

Attachment:
200kias CC.jpg


My plane will follow that table pretty well by itself with no pitch changes from me. Furthermore, I find that that setting the TO power at 93.9% N1 gives the same results...I don't have to touch the power levers until well into the 30's.


Thanks for sharing. I believe that is the anti-ice on chart, right?

Whoops. Good catch. I'll grab the correct one.

Attachment:
Cruise Climb 200KIAS.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 15:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1904
Post Likes: +1561
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
I was excited to post this 350 kts at 37k feet after rigging both FCUs, but I'm clearly outdone by your supercharged 501. So I'll counter with a question instead. Where is your safety pilot?

Nishaunt, what changes did you make?

How much adjustment was required relative to the last time they were done and when were they last done? OH? HSI? Engine installation?

What prompted you to look at the FCU's?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 16:25 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/26/14
Posts: 1659
Post Likes: +657
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Aircraft: Dreaming
Username Protected wrote:
Nishaunt, what changes did you make?

How much adjustment was required relative to the last time they were done and when were they last done? OH? HSI? Engine installation?

What prompted you to look at the FCU's?


Hi John,

One of the engines had irregular fuel flows at higher altitudes. After troubleshooting we made the decision to remove and replace the FCU. During the rigging process we noticed that the left and right engines were rigged differently (relationship between the flow divider and FCU). We figured out that somebody had done that intentionally to account for an airframe discrepancy with the throttle cables. We fixed that airframe discrepancy which allowed us to complete the FCU rigging per the MM. With all of that completed, we adjusted idle speed on both engines and the acceleration schedule on one engine to the MM specs.

I noticed an obvious change in performance. I couldn't tell you if it was the FCU, the rigging, or both but thus far I'm happy with the results.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 16:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1904
Post Likes: +1561
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
We figured out that somebody had done that intentionally to account for an airframe discrepancy with the throttle cables. We fixed that airframe discrepancy which allowed us to complete the FCU rigging per the MM.

Thanks for the info.

Unfortunately, that's not uncommon to find. It's easier and cheaper to fix the symptom and not the problem. We recently changed a horribly stretched cable on a 550 and it had gotten to the point that the engine would occasionally shut down when pulled to flight idle.

Nothing like some surprise single engine practice.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 05 May 2025, 17:47 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/26/14
Posts: 1659
Post Likes: +657
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Aircraft: Dreaming
Username Protected wrote:
We recently changed a horribly stretched cable on a 550 and it had gotten to the point that the engine would occasionally shut down when pulled to flight idle.


That sounds like fun! In my case, there was enough adjustment in the aft compartment to compensate for the discrepancy.

Also, there’s a detent on the flow divider that the arm falls into at flight idle. Might be worth checking the tension on the bearing at that detent because the arm shouldn’t move past that towards cutoff too easily.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 06 May 2025, 16:06 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/08/09
Posts: 7221
Post Likes: +4702
Location: Stuart, FL (KSUA)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
Finally found a sweetheart of a citation. Made a good deal.

Looking for ferry pilot to bring it from KHMP Speedway airport.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 06 May 2025, 18:28 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5165
Post Likes: +5125
Aircraft: C501, R66
Username Protected wrote:
Finally found a sweetheart of a citation. Made a good deal.

Looking for ferry pilot to bring it from KHMP Speedway airport.


That’s serial number 3! To the best of my knowledge, serial number one is still flying. I owned serial number 11 which I bought from Kenneth Copeland ministries. Every single piece on that Airplane was brand new. I parted it out because somebody had decided to derivet the Eaglewing to fix some leaks and it just wasn’t worth the money to put it back together.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 06 May 2025, 19:14 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 05/28/08
Posts: 1621
Post Likes: +479
Aircraft: Bonanza 36
Maybe this is one for the Tarver Parts House.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 07 May 2025, 03:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 2715
Post Likes: +1348
Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
Username Protected wrote:
Finally found a sweetheart of a citation. Made a good deal.

Looking for ferry pilot to bring it from KHMP Speedway airport.




I’ve flown 503CC more than once in the past. It was based in the LIT area once upon a time.


Robert T


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 2017 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135  Next



B-Kool

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Elite-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.CiESVer2.jpg.