banner
banner

01 May 2025, 07:42 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2025, 20:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/04/14
Posts: 1829
Post Likes: +1349
Location: Southern California
Aircraft: C 210
Username Protected wrote:

Yep, My 210D as well (essentially a retractable 206).

I've not flown a 206, but my 210 flies more "stable" than the 182s I have flown. Often referred to as "truck like" controls by the bonanza pilots :D Which personally I prefer for a traveling airplane. It will stay straight and level much easier. Also seems better at altitude with a little more wing.


load hauling beast


Not pictured is the wife and 100lb golden retriever.

Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2025, 21:33 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 12/25/22
Posts: 362
Post Likes: +556
Location: KLFT
Aircraft: 1981 T210N
I just weighed the factory O2 tanks and equipment I pulled out of my T210N this annual. It brings my UL up to 1645lbs. Pull the seat behind the pilot and add another 27lbs. And brings the full fuel payload to 1,150. Crazy.


Last edited on 08 Mar 2025, 00:24, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2025, 22:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/15/17
Posts: 1049
Post Likes: +543
Company: Cessna (retired)
Username Protected wrote:
I just weighed the factory O2 tanks and equipment I pulled out of my T210N this annual. It brings my UL up to 1645lbs. Pull the sea behind the pilot and add another 27lbs. And brings the full fuel payload to 1,150. Crazy.


Hard to beat a good T210. Flew them quite a bit through the employees flying club when I worked at Cessna. Also got some P210R time during service testing.


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2025, 23:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/01/15
Posts: 929
Post Likes: +907
Location: Hayward, CA
Aircraft: D50E
Ahhh…the 206! The Twin Bonanza of the fixed-gear single world! Excellent roomy haulers.


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2025, 11:56 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 12/09/07
Posts: 17114
Post Likes: +13048
Location: Cascade, ID (U70)
Aircraft: C182
On the U model of 206, note there is no door for the copilot/passenger.

If the person who usually sits there has trouble climbing in and twisting into the seat, that could be an issue.

_________________
"Great photo! You must have a really good camera."


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2025, 14:40 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/24/08
Posts: 2821
Post Likes: +1101
Aircraft: Cessna 182M
Username Protected wrote:
On the U model of 206, note there is no door for the copilot/passenger.

If the person who usually sits there has trouble climbing in and twisting into the seat, that could be an issue.

Tom,

Not a problem, just add $:

https://www.wipaire.com/modification/co-pilot-door/

:D

RAS


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2025, 14:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/23/18
Posts: 794
Post Likes: +1195
Aircraft: Aerostar
Username Protected wrote:
There is a 207 for sale locally on facebook marketplace.
>19K hours on the airframe and they want almost $200k
Is that smoking crack, or are they really commanding such a price ?


I have a bunch of time in the 207.

Lots of space or seats.

Fwd baggage compartment- sized for triple mailers of soda.

Those planes made money back in the day before Caravans showed up.

https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/387497

This is one of them:

Crashed and rebuilt because they aren’t making any more.

https://www.aircraft.com/aircraft/20096 ... cessna-207

The 206 was more of a sports car, better handling (although the STOL mod that dropped the ailerons, made controls much heavier.

And, the back cargo doors are blocked from opening if the flaps were down.


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 08 Mar 2025, 15:33 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4696
Post Likes: +5296
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
Username Protected wrote:
There is a 207 for sale locally on facebook marketplace.
>19K hours on the airframe and they want almost $200k
Is that smoking crack, or are they really commanding such a price ?

207s are for hauling paying cargo and passengers <100 miles, and they're really good at it.

They don't make as much sense for most private owners.


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2025, 03:45 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 9088
Post Likes: +6847
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
Username Protected wrote:

And, the back cargo doors are blocked from opening if the flaps were down.


There’s an STC that resolves this by changing the hinge. The forward door becomes removable.

https://www.airframeinnovations.com/pro ... ess-system

There’s another that modifies the door so that the flaps don’t block it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2025, 09:48 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4696
Post Likes: +5296
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
Username Protected wrote:

And, the back cargo doors are blocked from opening if the flaps were down.


There’s an STC that resolves this by changing the hinge. The forward door becomes removable.

https://www.airframeinnovations.com/pro ... ess-system

There’s another that modifies the door so that the flaps don’t block it.


I like this one, because no change in behavior is required during an emergency. The door opens the exact same way it does with flaps up.

https://www.coastdogaviation.com/Cessna ... cation.php

Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2025, 10:03 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/20/16
Posts: 7059
Post Likes: +9310
Location: Austin, TX area
Aircraft: OPA
This was our C205. Almost the same as C206 but had a 260 hp IO470. We took it to Colorado a lot when my parents had a second home there. 4-5 + bags with half tanks out of Salida no problem.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2025, 10:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/06/14
Posts: 3692
Post Likes: +2555
Location: MA
Aircraft: Cessna 340A
Username Protected wrote:

There’s an STC that resolves this by changing the hinge. The forward door becomes removable.

https://www.airframeinnovations.com/pro ... ess-system

There’s another that modifies the door so that the flaps don’t block it.


I like this one, because no change in behavior is required during an emergency. The door opens the exact same way it does with flaps up.

https://www.coastdogaviation.com/Cessna ... cation.php

I thought only the forward door was blocked, and you could open it enough to open the rear door.

An operational tip is that if the flaps don't work, it could be a fault of the door sensor.

Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2025, 10:39 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4696
Post Likes: +5296
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
Username Protected wrote:

I thought only the forward door was blocked, and you could open it enough to open the rear door.

An operational tip is that if the flaps don't work, it could be a fault of the door sensor.

Both of those are correct.

I really didn’t like the “open the forward door a little, pull the red handle, crack the rear door just a bit but not too much, push the red handle back up, open the rear door” solution because even though I had every rear seat passenger demonstrate it to me before takeoff, the accident files show that procedure doesn’t work in an emergency with brain fire.

If I still owned a 206 I’d put the flappy door mod on right away. It’s almost as important as shoulder harnesses.

Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 09 Mar 2025, 13:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/02/22
Posts: 30
Post Likes: +16
Aircraft: R172K
with my plane being on amphibs I installed the flappy Coast Dog door first winter.

Its great and no need to explain anything to passengers other than how to open the door.

Hopefully its a big waste of money and never gets properly used lol


Top

 Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206
PostPosted: 11 Mar 2025, 10:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/13
Posts: 1229
Post Likes: +507
Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
whats different on a 1970 182 and the 1973p model, whats different on the 205 vs 206?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Aviation Fabricators (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.bkool-85x50-2014-08-04.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.