01 May 2025, 07:42 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 07 Mar 2025, 20:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/04/14 Posts: 1829 Post Likes: +1349 Location: Southern California
Aircraft: C 210
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yep, My 210D as well (essentially a retractable 206). I've not flown a 206, but my 210 flies more "stable" than the 182s I have flown. Often referred to as "truck like" controls by the bonanza pilots  Which personally I prefer for a traveling airplane. It will stay straight and level much easier. Also seems better at altitude with a little more wing. load hauling beast
Not pictured is the wife and 100lb golden retriever.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 07 Mar 2025, 21:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/25/22 Posts: 362 Post Likes: +556 Location: KLFT
Aircraft: 1981 T210N
|
|
I just weighed the factory O2 tanks and equipment I pulled out of my T210N this annual. It brings my UL up to 1645lbs. Pull the seat behind the pilot and add another 27lbs. And brings the full fuel payload to 1,150. Crazy.
Last edited on 08 Mar 2025, 00:24, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 07 Mar 2025, 22:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1049 Post Likes: +543 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I just weighed the factory O2 tanks and equipment I pulled out of my T210N this annual. It brings my UL up to 1645lbs. Pull the sea behind the pilot and add another 27lbs. And brings the full fuel payload to 1,150. Crazy. Hard to beat a good T210. Flew them quite a bit through the employees flying club when I worked at Cessna. Also got some P210R time during service testing.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 08 Mar 2025, 14:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/24/08 Posts: 2821 Post Likes: +1101
Aircraft: Cessna 182M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On the U model of 206, note there is no door for the copilot/passenger.
If the person who usually sits there has trouble climbing in and twisting into the seat, that could be an issue. Tom, Not a problem, just add $: https://www.wipaire.com/modification/co-pilot-door/ RAS
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 08 Mar 2025, 14:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/23/18 Posts: 794 Post Likes: +1195
Aircraft: Aerostar
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is a 207 for sale locally on facebook marketplace. >19K hours on the airframe and they want almost $200k Is that smoking crack, or are they really commanding such a price ? I have a bunch of time in the 207. Lots of space or seats. Fwd baggage compartment- sized for triple mailers of soda. Those planes made money back in the day before Caravans showed up. https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/387497This is one of them: Crashed and rebuilt because they aren’t making any more. https://www.aircraft.com/aircraft/20096 ... cessna-207The 206 was more of a sports car, better handling (although the STOL mod that dropped the ailerons, made controls much heavier. And, the back cargo doors are blocked from opening if the flaps were down.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 08 Mar 2025, 15:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4696 Post Likes: +5296 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is a 207 for sale locally on facebook marketplace. >19K hours on the airframe and they want almost $200k Is that smoking crack, or are they really commanding such a price ? 207s are for hauling paying cargo and passengers <100 miles, and they're really good at it. They don't make as much sense for most private owners.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 03:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/23/13 Posts: 9088 Post Likes: +6847 Company: Kokotele Guitar Works Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
|
|
Username Protected wrote: And, the back cargo doors are blocked from opening if the flaps were down.
There’s an STC that resolves this by changing the hinge. The forward door becomes removable. https://www.airframeinnovations.com/pro ... ess-systemThere’s another that modifies the door so that the flaps don’t block it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 10:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/20/16 Posts: 7059 Post Likes: +9310 Location: Austin, TX area
Aircraft: OPA
|
|
This was our C205. Almost the same as C206 but had a 260 hp IO470. We took it to Colorado a lot when my parents had a second home there. 4-5 + bags with half tanks out of Salida no problem.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 10:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/06/14 Posts: 3692 Post Likes: +2555 Location: MA
Aircraft: Cessna 340A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There’s an STC that resolves this by changing the hinge. The forward door becomes removable. https://www.airframeinnovations.com/pro ... ess-systemThere’s another that modifies the door so that the flaps don’t block it. I like this one, because no change in behavior is required during an emergency. The door opens the exact same way it does with flaps up. https://www.coastdogaviation.com/Cessna ... cation.php I thought only the forward door was blocked, and you could open it enough to open the rear door.
An operational tip is that if the flaps don't work, it could be a fault of the door sensor.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 10:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4696 Post Likes: +5296 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I thought only the forward door was blocked, and you could open it enough to open the rear door. An operational tip is that if the flaps don't work, it could be a fault of the door sensor. Both of those are correct.
I really didn’t like the “open the forward door a little, pull the red handle, crack the rear door just a bit but not too much, push the red handle back up, open the rear door” solution because even though I had every rear seat passenger demonstrate it to me before takeoff, the accident files show that procedure doesn’t work in an emergency with brain fire.
If I still owned a 206 I’d put the flappy door mod on right away. It’s almost as important as shoulder harnesses.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 vs 206 Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 10:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/13 Posts: 1229 Post Likes: +507 Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
|
|
whats different on a 1970 182 and the 1973p model, whats different on the 205 vs 206?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|