06 May 2025, 13:44 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 18:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/08/13 Posts: 543 Post Likes: +305 Company: Citation Jet Exchange Location: St. Louis
Aircraft: 58P C510 C525 Excel
|
|
I'd recommend a Mustang, for those short legs it will save $$$ in fuel over the others listed, and it should be far cheaper in maintenance than the King Airs (It is far cheaper than our E90 was and currently far cheaper than our TBM 700). It's a modern platform that's economical to operate and maintain. As Anthony said, that range should not be an issue. I did need to stop this spring from VNC-CPS with 4 full size adults on board coming back into 100 knot headwind, it was right on the border of being able to do it but figured everyone would want to stretch anyway rather than push it. Myself (210lbs) + 700lbs of people and 100lbs of baggage. For your given weight load and the closer distance to Indy that trip would have been easily doable.
IF you wanted more room, a little more speed, and more carrying capacity a CJ/CJ1 will fit nicely. Personally, I'd choose a G600TXI equipped CJ over a CJ1 as it's a modern platform that will be much cheaper to maintain than a Proline 21.
A CJ2 is a great plane too, however it'll be tough to find in that price range, and it will burn a lot more fuel on your short trips.
Pilots are plentiful on the 525 series, we have 6 in our group, I know of a few in Indiana, and there just seem to be more out there, especially those that are doing this solely as a contractor gig.
I/we manage:
1 Mustang 2 CJs 2 CJ2+ 1 CJ2 1 CJ3+ 1 Excel 1 TBM
In addition to being a broker, I can help with the initial setup and cover few trips with pilots if needed as STL isn't far away.
-The Citation Jet Exchange
_________________ The Citation Jet Exchange www.CitationJetX.com CJs, Mustangs, Excels
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 18:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19946 Post Likes: +25018 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is absolutely ZERO chance the Mustang does not make this trip……easily. I just flew from SRQ to JVL with serious headwinds…….over 100 knots for a decent portion of the trip. Never had less than 45 knots on the nose This trip? https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a2 ... labelsGeomBlock speed was 274 knots. That's not a 100 knot headwind trip in a Mustang over 966 nm. Your photo is just passing Atlanta with a groundspeed of 258 knots. Your were 306 knots at the Florida border. before that By the time you got to the Kentucky border, you were over 300 knots again. You did have that big wind in Georgia, but that was not over the entire trip, it was rather localized. On a truly 100 knot headwind day, you probably don't make it. There will definitely be days you can't go KSRQ to KJVL non stop. Indy is a bit closer, so maybe that percentage is so high as to be good enough. The north south direction tends not to suffer that too much, but head west and it can be 100 knots for a 2000 miles. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 18:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4702 Post Likes: +5297 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The north south direction tends not to suffer that too much, but head west and it can be 100 knots for a 2000 miles. Well, that’s good to know since the OP will be going north south. He never mentioned a 2000 mile trip to the west - probably because that would put him into the Pacific Ocean. Sounds like a Mustang will work if that’s what he chooses.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 19:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19946 Post Likes: +25018 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I did need to stop this spring from VNC-CPS with 4 full size adults on board coming back into 100 knot headwind 791 nm. KVNC to KTYQ (Indy Exec) is 799 nm. Real world example that certain conditions may need a fuel stop. Quote: Personally, I'd choose a G600TXI equipped CJ over a CJ1 as it's a modern platform that will be much cheaper to maintain than a Proline 21. Agreed. I have G700 TXi (same thing as G600 TXi). It is a steal that my yearly database subscription is $830. I don't know what a PL21 costs for data and maintenance, but I bet it is at least 10 times. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 19:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'd suggest a CJ/CJ1/CJ2, based on personal experience. Obviously, I want to fly mine, which you may not want. But they easily fit your mission & budget, are ubiquitous for parts, planes and pilots, and are (or will soon be) available to upgrade to the latest in avionics.
I considered a King Air, which would have a been an easy'ish step up from my Baron E55. However, at the end of the day it's too loud, doesn't fly high enough to top all the weather, and it's too slow.
I considered legacy Citations (501, 650 etc) but in the end I wanted something newer, and I wanted to easily be able to find pilots. You know how many 525-typed pilots there are? A lot.
I never really considered a PC 12. I hear they are great planes, but I don't need the seating capacity, I prefer a twin, and it's too slow. I just did KPTK-KCRW-KPTK, arrived at the airport at 7:30am, in the air by 8:00, back by 10:15am and I was in my office working by 10:40am. Time is money. Per the PC12 not sure I’d want to strap into one that was 2.5M anyways
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 19:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19946 Post Likes: +25018 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Funny thing about FL at least flying from St. Louis is with the mainly East-West wind, let's say 100knots, you only have 15-40 knots of TW going down and 50-80 knots HW coming home as you have to crab into the wind both directions. You end flying mostly in headwinds because you fly slower when you have one, and there is a headwind over more course directions due to crabbing. This makes the "still air range" a mythical thing. I've almost never had anything close to still air in cruise. And often, like you said, you get a headwind both ways. One should judge planes with headwinds. Faster airplanes just make headwinds less of an issue. They don't cure it, but they make it more tolerable. This is why I think I can fly my V for about the same fuel as a 501. I go faster, go higher, and both make headwinds less of an issue. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 19:37 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I did need to stop this spring from VNC-CPS with 4 full size adults on board coming back into 100 knot headwind 791 nm. KVNC to KTYQ (Indy Exec) is 799 nm. Real world example that certain conditions may need a fuel stop. Quote: Personally, I'd choose a G600TXI equipped CJ over a CJ1 as it's a modern platform that will be much cheaper to maintain than a Proline 21. Agreed. I have G700 TXi (same thing as G600 TXi). It is a steal that my yearly database subscription is $830. I don't know what a PL21 costs for data and maintenance, but I bet it is at least 10 times. Mike C.
I’d stay far away from proline, it’s heavy, antiquated and a major AOG item
Just garmin it
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 22:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/30/23 Posts: 13
Aircraft: N/A
|
|
Now that you mention it, that does sound nice....what plane would that be? Just had to fly commercial back from LA. Username Protected wrote: Man, it’s fun to spend someone else’s money when they have a $2.5M budget. There are at least a half dozen real options that will work and make sense. It’s so much better than the posts on other boards. “I need to fly my family of six from New York to LA every month. I have $100,000. What should I buy?” 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profileG Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 22:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/29/22 Posts: 61 Post Likes: +93
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Older turbo prop
King air is a easy one
Maybe a MU2
Aero commander
For sure needs a nice panel, full WAAS with a modern AP and glass panel
I’d just find the nicest example and go from there
The old jets are tempting, but often have very old avionics, get much more iffy in bad conditions and limit where you can go runway wise, they are also only slightly faster and burn much more fuel
I’d also not skimp on the pilot, which will be likely more important than the plane, ideally you’ll want to hire one who can also manage the plane, find hangars, schedule maintenance, training, etc, I’d find a ATP/CFI with min 2500tt, 500 multi, 500 turbine, ideally one who also owns his own plane, I’d expect to pay 120-140k yr with benefits A full time jet pilot/manager with the experience required to do the job should demand probably $150k to start if they aren’t typed to begin with, and more if they are and experienced in type. I would guess in the citation market, it’s probably a $180-200k job if a person is coming in typed and current with management experience. Someone willing to do it for $120k is probably someone that I wouldn’t want flying my family and managing my asset. For the OP: As for the aircraft if it’s not a Citation, I LOVE the PC-12, it’s perfect fit but it’s way out of budget. A King Air -90 with blackhawks is good, the 200 is also good but the full fuel payload issue makes it a pass for me. The MU-2 would be my pick. A nice Marquise can be had for not much over $1MM fully updated, and it’s easily 300 knots on less than $1500 an hour total op cost including overpriced pilot and hangar. Sounds like you are gonna have a fun search! Whatever you get, you will definitely enjoy it!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profileG Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 22:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Older turbo prop
King air is a easy one
Maybe a MU2
Aero commander
For sure needs a nice panel, full WAAS with a modern AP and glass panel
I’d just find the nicest example and go from there
The old jets are tempting, but often have very old avionics, get much more iffy in bad conditions and limit where you can go runway wise, they are also only slightly faster and burn much more fuel
I’d also not skimp on the pilot, which will be likely more important than the plane, ideally you’ll want to hire one who can also manage the plane, find hangars, schedule maintenance, training, etc, I’d find a ATP/CFI with min 2500tt, 500 multi, 500 turbine, ideally one who also owns his own plane, I’d expect to pay 120-140k yr with benefits A full time jet pilot/manager with the experience required to do the job should demand probably $150k to start if they aren’t typed to begin with, and more if they are and experienced in type. I would guess in the citation market, it’s probably a $180-200k job if a person is coming in typed and current with management experience. Someone willing to do it for $120k is probably someone that I wouldn’t want flying my family and managing my asset. For the OP: As for the aircraft if it’s not a Citation, I LOVE the PC-12, it’s perfect fit but it’s way out of budget. A King Air -90 with blackhawks is good, the 200 is also good but the full fuel payload issue makes it a pass for me. The MU-2 would be my pick. A nice Marquise can be had for not much over $1MM fully updated, and it’s easily 300 knots on less than $1500 an hour total op cost including overpriced pilot and hangar. Sounds like you are gonna have a fun search! Whatever you get, you will definitely enjoy it!
Agree
I wasn’t taking a clapped out jet
These days I’d be 150k to start as a non mangement PIC on a old jet with a budget owner
Mangement with the second full time job of the maintenance most of the budget jets need, I’m looking at 220k at least, and for the level of rope that’s looking to hang me on a budget class jet, why would I even go there
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 23:06 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7814 Post Likes: +10199 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I downloaded the FAA airmen database.
This lists the type ratings people have.
With a little analysis and spreadsheet formula magic, I counted the type ratings for the legacy Citations (CE-500), CJ series (CE-525), and Mustangs (CE-510).
The totals:
CE-500: 14059 CE-525: 6847 CE-510: 1254
There are more than twice as many CE-500 type rated pilots out there as CJ series, and more than 10 to 1 over Mustang.
I wouldn't dismiss a legacy Citation due to the mistaken idea it will be hard to find pilots.
The count includes both crew and single pilot ratings where applicable.
Mike C. So, are you saying there’s 14k active Citation 500 pilots currently flying or that there’s been 14k pilots typed?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 23:29 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7814 Post Likes: +10199 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Cessna has been building CE-500’s since 1971 so yes, there have been over 14k pilot’s typed. Are there 14k pilots, in the US, typed and 12 month training current… not a chance.
Here's the actual numbers of aircraft of each type, this is worldwide.
CE-525: 2529 CE-500: 2126 CE-560XL: 1021 CE-680: 911 CE-510: 472 CE-750: 381 CE-650: 303
There are more CE-525’s than there are CE-500's and Textron is still building CE-525’s so obviously there are going to be more pilots flying 525's, as I mentioned before many CE-525 typed pilots are also CE-500 pilots, but quite a few are not current on the 500, because it was done early their career and they have moved on, some to 525’s and many to CE-560XL / 680.
I can only speak from experience, I don’t have time to google and make spreadsheets, but I hire contract pilots as part of my daily operations, all over the country and it’s typically easier to find 525 guys than it is 500 guys.
It's hard finding pilots, period. What matters most is that if you plan on using contract pilots, find a couple that are typed and current in whatever model you are considering buying. There may be 10 pilots who are CE-500 and two who are 525, who knows, but this is a question a potential operator needs to answer if it that factor weighs into their decision of which airframe to choose.
Last edited on 14 Dec 2023, 07:21, edited 3 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|