02 Dec 2025, 03:09 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 11:21 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8628 Post Likes: +11194 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Has a PT-6 ever failed?
Are all M600 on program?
My close friend bought a PC-12 and 6 months after he bought it he ended up with a $500k bill for engine issues.
Can that not happen on other PT-6? Is Chuck out of warranty and at risk of a major failure that comes with major bill? Or do all M600 come with lifetime engine programs all paid?
Chip no we can not all agree, obviously. The one thing we can agree on is you will argue to the end of days your point and never give an inch. What I think we can all agree on is you are unable to learn anything new as you already know everything.
Mike The Citation has more than TWICE the engine exposure. A. There are two of them. B. They have MUCH more expensive components and LLC's. I'm just pointing out what's being left out.
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 11:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4917 Post Likes: +5585 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm still trying to figure out why anyone is comparing 30 and 40 year old Citations to new M600s. Because it makes the jet look much, much better. Nobody shopping for a new M600 is going to look twice at a 560, and nobody shopping for a 560 is going to get anywhere near a Piper dealership. There is some great info in this thread on jets. It would be even better if we could bring in info on real-world competitive turboprop airframes that a potential 501, 550 or 560 owner might consider.
Last edited on 21 Oct 2023, 12:00, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 12:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/10/17 Posts: 328 Post Likes: +285 Company: Fly Buy LLC Location: FL
Aircraft: Bonanza, C501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As many of my threads I start are, this one was born out of thread drift on another thread.
The statement was made on the Meridian thread that a Legacy Citation could be operated for less than a Meridian… well, that was the exact wrong aircraft to pick on for op cost!
The Piper PA-46 turbine has long been known as the most economical turbine aircraft you can operate. They are stupid simple and inexpensive to work on, its just a piston airplane with a Pratt on it.
Then the narrative became that I am anti-Legacy Citation, anybody that knows me knows that that is laughable! The first jet that Jet Acquisitions ever acquired was a Citation V! I’d have to look, but we’ve probably done more V/Ultras than any other model of jet. It’s at least tied with Mustangs.
Here’s what I can do, I can demonstrate that a Legacy Citation is as economical to own and operate as any turboprop, save the JetProp/ Meridian and maybe the Piaggio or Eclipse. What’s more is that I can do this without stacking the deck, I’m talking similar acquisition cost and identical maintenance standards. None of this comparing a $600k jet with a $2.6M turboprop or claiming a Phase 5 on a Citation V only cost $30k… real numbers. Apples and apples. The only qualifications that I will add are that we are excluding life limited engine components and extraordinary unexpected expenses due to AD’s, corrosion, etc. The unknowns are always unknown and too hard to quantify.
Ok, my King Air, TBM and Pilatus guys… come at me. Prove me wrong!  Chip’s original post. He clearly states a legacy citation IS AS economical to own as any turbo prop except jet prop /meridian and maybe piaggio and eclipse. AT similar acquisition costs and excluding extraordinary unexpected expenses. Seems to me the legacy citation guys including me agree. When figuring in capX, we really agree. Thanks for making a strong case for the old Citation Chip.
_________________ Karl Warner F33A, C-501
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 12:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1676 Post Likes: +1551 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm still trying to figure out why anyone is comparing 30 and 40 year old Citations to new M600s. Because it makes the jet look much, much better. Nobody shopping for a new M600 is going to look twice at a 560, and nobody shopping for a 560 is going to get anywhere near a Piper dealership.
I may be an outlier but I was seriously looking at a Meridian as I owned a Mirage. Also looked at KA's but ended up skipping the TP phase and glad I did.
There are a few guys on here that have had a Meridians and now a Citation. I have 3 people that have reached out to talk about citations that own Meridians. So it's not as crazy as it seems.
Most guys that can own a Meridian can afford a Citation. It's amazing how little many plane owners know about the options and market. Which I get is one of the values Chip adds.
Fact is everyone really wants to own a Jet and now with Legacy Citations thats more affordable than ever. I think the fact that Tarver has sold 80 of them is proof. Thats the intent of this thread.
Chip is wasting the digital space trying to convince everyone of his old ways. It's like when I bought my first EFI engine and my dad was pissed. Said the Carb was better and all that EFI stuff was junk. Sometimes experience can work against you.
Mike
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 12:10 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8628 Post Likes: +11194 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chip
It's odd you don't mention the exposure of the PT-6 since you were so worried about everyone having all the data.
What are the stats on PT-6 Failure compared to jet engines like the JT15?
Also yes my jet has two engines so if one fails it's a non event. If a PT-6 fails in a SETP it's a problem. I do not worry about engine failure in my plane. There is a cost for that and I think well worth it. How many Citations have crashed off field because of engine failures?
But personally I don't care about exposure from major engine issues, I don't have any. I pay $25K a year for that insurance. For me it's worth the $25K a year to not have a $500k event. Will I end up paying more in the long run, yes just like most insurance programs. We all can choose what level of exposure we take on.
Every Aircraft has lots of exposure, nobody is saying they don't. For Mike C the risk of engine failure is pretty low and one he is willing to take. Chuck is willing to take the risk of his PT-6 failing and turning his plane into a glider over the mountains at night, It's also very low risk.
Mike And that's why we always include engine reserves in DOC's, to not do so is disingenuous. In the case of your airplane and the vast majority of the entire Citation fleet, that is done by way of the engine program, for all other Citations it is included as reserves. At $1200 an hour, Mike C. is leaving the engine reserves out completely. You can't do that and call it a fair comparison.
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 12:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4917 Post Likes: +5585 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Here's a Conquest II for $700,000 with engines a few years from TBO. The panel could be upgraded but it just fine as-is. https://www.controller.com/listing/for- ... p-aircraftTHAT is a valid comparison to today's 501s, etc. Maybe we can get someone to intelligently comment on that plane - other than someone who thinks RVSM on a 441 isn't worth it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 12:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3713 Post Likes: +5493 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Reverse numbers for me are 4:05, 710 gallons.
Mike C. Looking at my fuel prices today. Not much competition for fuel at Destin. 7.82 per gallon. 710 gallons would be $5552 in fuel costs in the V. I am looking at financial mitigation strategies short of taking out a second on my home. Prob going to get enough fuel to be polite and waive ramp and handling fees, and stop in Tulsa for some $4 fuel. These prices are a little crazy. Especially when gas here is 2.99 cash price at the station next to our resort.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 13:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1676 Post Likes: +1551 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chip
It's odd you don't mention the exposure of the PT-6 since you were so worried about everyone having all the data.
What are the stats on PT-6 Failure compared to jet engines like the JT15?
Also yes my jet has two engines so if one fails it's a non event. If a PT-6 fails in a SETP it's a problem. I do not worry about engine failure in my plane. There is a cost for that and I think well worth it. How many Citations have crashed off field because of engine failures?
But personally I don't care about exposure from major engine issues, I don't have any. I pay $25K a year for that insurance. For me it's worth the $25K a year to not have a $500k event. Will I end up paying more in the long run, yes just like most insurance programs. We all can choose what level of exposure we take on.
Every Aircraft has lots of exposure, nobody is saying they don't. For Mike C the risk of engine failure is pretty low and one he is willing to take. Chuck is willing to take the risk of his PT-6 failing and turning his plane into a glider over the mountains at night, It's also very low risk.
Mike And that's why we always include engine reserves in DOC's, to not do so is disingenuous. In the case of your airplane and the vast majority of the entire Citation fleet, that is done by way of the engine program, for all other Citations it is included as reserves. At $1200 an hour, Mike C. is leaving the engine reserves out completely. You can't do that and call it a fair comparison.
Wait $1200 an hour? How is that possible? I pay $400 an hour total for my engine program. You are saying a JT15 is 3x just for reserves?
And you say Mike C plays with numbers?
Mike
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 13:24 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8628 Post Likes: +11194 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
|
I've always thought of op cost and acquisition cost like a seesaw, as one goes up the other usually goes down.
People typically lean one way or the other, and that does not make either of them wrong or illogical.
When I sold airplanes I really didn't understand this, I couldn't figure out for the life of me why someone would buy a brand new King Air instead of the one that I had... my airplane carried more, had better avionics, new paint and interior, maybe even Blackhawks... AND it was half of the cost of a new one.
A Citation V? Oh my gosh, talk about frustrating! We had a 7000 hour Ultra, two corporate owners, new paint and interior, 0/0 since overhaul... and people are spending more to get a CJ? What the heck? More for a little toy Mustang? What is wrong with these people!
Sales people invariably focus on selling what they have. When you step away and listen to an aircraft buyer, understand their logic and motivations, you begin to see the big picture. For some people low acquisition cost is paramount, others may spend more to get more. We recently had a client hire us to buy an M2, through the process they switched to a CJ3+... that's a big jump in acquisition cost and only a moderate increase in range, people and performance. Once they decided to spend that kind of money, a new opportunity presented itself, 50% ownership in a 2022 Phenom 300E...
Stupid? A casual observer might think so, an M2 guys would say "you should have just stayed with the M2" Mike would say "you should have bought a 560, hell any 560"
Others would say "with that kind of budget why in the world would you buy half an airplane"
I know each and every one of the deciding factors and they are doing what makes the most sense.
There is so much that goes into the decisions, so many factors, most of us think someone doesn't know what they are doing because we don't have all of the information they have.
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 13:25 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8628 Post Likes: +11194 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: And that's why we always include engine reserves in DOC's, to not do so is disingenuous.
In the case of your airplane and the vast majority of the entire Citation fleet, that is done by way of the engine program, for all other Citations it is included as reserves.
At $1200 an hour, Mike C. is leaving the engine reserves out completely. You can't do that and call it a fair comparison.
Wait $1200 an hour? How is that possible? I pay $400 an hour total for my engine program. You are saying a JT15 is 3x just for reserves? And you say Mike C plays with numbers? Mike
He says his total DOC's are $1200 an hour, that number doesn't include engine reserves.
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 13:31 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8628 Post Likes: +11194 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
|
One more parable about acquisition cost.
During the pandemic, Amy and I had a discussion about buying gold as a hedge against financial crisis, I said if we had an extra $10k what would you do, she of course replied "buy gold" and then I said if we had an extra $100k what would you do? She replied the same, to which I said, no we'd buy a 182, it's just like gold, you can always get your money back out of it... but you also get to use it.
I wish I had been smart enough to act on that nugget of advice.
The point is that a lot of people are sitting on piles of cash, some of those folks decide to park those funds in airplanes. You'd be shocked how many multi-million dollar airplanes our clients pay cash for. (we also help our clients get financing, so I'm not implying all of our clients have money to pay cash)
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 21 Oct 2023, 13:33 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8628 Post Likes: +11194 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Oh got it. I misread that and thought you are saying his engine reserve should be $1200
How much should his engine reserves be? How much should an engine and prop reserve be on a Meridian?
Mike $340 an hour for the Citation V Probably $150 an hour for the Meridian.
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|