06 May 2025, 17:20 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 18 Oct 2023, 23:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/02/16 Posts: 574 Post Likes: +457
Aircraft: D55, C172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I found this today on an old 500 that I am parting out. This is from a few years ago at a big name shop.
All I can tell you is look at the number my finger is pointing at this. This is a 10,000 hour inspection with some squawks on an airplane that is probably worth double of what this bill was.
This is pretty standard and I’ve got many more examples just like this.
You cannot take your 500 series airplane brand-name shop unless you think this is OK. I assure you the quality of the work they’re doing is not any better than we do for probably 20% the cost. Well Chip does it have to be Mike P or will Mike T work? Or will $115 every 6 months portable fire extinguisher check work? Fact is Chip, and completely understandable, you don’t know squat about Legacy Citation maintenance. End of story.
_________________ Embrace The Suck
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 18 Oct 2023, 23:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4702 Post Likes: +5297 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I found this today on an old 500 that I am parting out. This is from a few years ago at a big name shop.
All I can tell you is look at the number my finger is pointing at this. This is a 10,000 hour inspection with some squawks on an airplane that is probably worth double of what this bill was.
This is pretty standard and I’ve got many more examples just like this.
You cannot take your 500 series airplane brand-name shop unless you think this is OK. I assure you the quality of the work they’re doing is not any better than we do for probably 20% the cost. Do you have the list of what was fixed? The total doesn’t mean much without the line items. I don’t see how you can make the claim you can do the work for 20% of the cost without that information. Perhaps the bad decision wasn’t choosing the wrong shop, it was choosing to have it fixed instead of parting it out. I bet this bill was run up without any intermediate discussions with the owner about whether or not the patient was worth saving. When Mike C published his cheap inspections, he included the details of exactly what was fixed. To have a fair comparison, an expensive series of inspections should include the same level of detail. Without the detail, there’s no way to reach an educated conclusion.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 01:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3137 Post Likes: +2282 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Where is all of this money going when we pay $6,500 for a rheostat that costs $5? What are those meetings like when Textron decides to charge $1,800 for a seat rail bolt?
I am building a kit aircraft, the entire airframe is $28,000 and I think half of that is profit. We have a worn seat rail we’re just leaving as is because that single piece of aluminum track that should cost $40 at Autozone is somehow $7,000. It’s not even made by Textron.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 09:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/31/13 Posts: 1295 Post Likes: +696 Company: Docking Drawer Location: KCCR
Aircraft: C425
|
|
Quote: We have a worn seat rail we’re just leaving as is because that single piece of aluminum track that should cost $40 at Autozone is somehow $7,000. It’s not even made by Textron. Is that a Cessna part? It's $7000 from Textron? If so, ask Textron for a pricing review. I think you need to have an account with https://ww2.txtav.com/Parts/ but that's easy to set up. They might reduce the price.
_________________ ATP, CFI-I, MEI http://www.dockingdrawer.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 10:51 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1604 Post Likes: +1679 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We’re looking for a V, as Kirk mentioned, I always prefer to do a Phase 5 as a prebuy, because it’s the most invasive inspection, but it has to be coming up within months to get a seller to agree to it, because they know that at almost any shop it’s going to generate $50k plus in discrepancies. Chip, This is the kind of stuff that winds we active owners up. What on earth could cause "$50k plus in discrepancies" to come up on a well-maintained plane? Is it possible? Sure. There is a thread on CJP where someone with an 1,100 hour Mustang, a crack was found on an interior rib of the horizontal stab. Textron is quoting $100k. But your statement that the seller would "know" that a Phase 5 will generate $50k in discrepancies is nuts IMO. I haven't been through a Phase 5 but I just finished my 1-4. Total discrepancies were a bit of ducting in the tail (heat exchanger exhaust ducting), a set of peri seals for one bleed air connection in the tail, 2 spots of corrosion found on the flaps (likely rocks kicked up that chipped the paint and then more dirt/salt etc flung into the area and caused corrosion) that was fixed with $2,700 of sanding and paint (and that also included touching up some other paint areas since the painter was there), and a leaking sump drain that needed a new o-ring. I'm 3 years out for my Phase 5 but I would absolutely take you up on your offer - I am confident that I would come out ahead on that deal. Again, stuff can happen whether it's a 172, a Bo, or a jet. That's why we do the inspections in the first place. But the bottom line is that if someone "knows" that that they are going to have $50k plus in discrepancies during an inspection, then they are NOT maintaining their airplane, period.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 11:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6410 Post Likes: +5143
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Duncan is on my field. I wanted so bad to use them as the cost for me to move my plane to TX is a lot. Just to reposition there and back probably cost me 4 total days and more than $8k in cost. I used this logic, I needed a pair of wires ran from one audio panel to the other, Duncan was on the field, so I got a quote, I authorized the work based on the reposition costs I estimated, as well as my time involved to do so $4000 to run a pair of 24 gauge wires, so that the co-pilot mic on audio panel 2 could be used by the sat phone interface in audio panel 1 Impressively expensive, they were done 3-4hours after I gave them the hangar door code
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 11:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1538 Post Likes: +1454 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Still waiting for the 1-4 quote. But here is a good example I did find. Take a look at all of these little inspections. You can also see the quote was done for Mike Hopkins the guy that was helping me. It was not sent to me directly. Duncan is twice as much as Skyway for these, double. Which again skyway is a premium shop and at the top end of the spectrum of pricing. Duncan is twice as much. Not sure if you call that good plated but it’s crazy high. I think gold plated is a good description. Would love to know what I get for paying double the price. Not a damn thing except making guys like Chip feel good. Mike Attachment: IMG_2460.jpeg Attachment: IMG_2461.jpeg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 12:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 9625 Post Likes: +4470 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Duncan is twice as much as Skyway for these, double. Which again skyway is a premium shop and at the top end of the spectrum of pricing. Duncan is twice as much. Not sure if you call that good plated but it’s crazy high. I think gold plated is a good description. Gotta compare apples to apples. Your Duncan Phase 20 quote includes RVSM. The Skyways quote has that as a separate line item. They are very close to each other once you account for that. I worked for Duncan 24 years. Honest company that treats their customers and employees well. They will never be the cheapest but do good work.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 12:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/07/19 Posts: 379 Post Likes: +823
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We bid on a job a couple years ago. We were $1mm less than the other bid and offered more services. We thought we had the job in the bag. We didn’t get it and I figured it just blew it as a sales guy or maybe we were too cheap and they thought we were not as good quality.
A couple months ago it came out that the GC got a $800k kick back from the sub contractor. The customer found out somehow. I was shocked. I never even thought that could happen. But sure enough it did.
You just never now what’s really going on when cost are way higher than they should be.
Mike That's a pretty sneaky way to insinuate Chip is getting kickbacks from his gold-plated shop preferences.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 19 Oct 2023, 14:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1538 Post Likes: +1454 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Duncan is twice as much as Skyway for these, double. Which again skyway is a premium shop and at the top end of the spectrum of pricing. Duncan is twice as much. Not sure if you call that good plated but it’s crazy high. I think gold plated is a good description. Gotta compare apples to apples. Your Duncan Phase 20 quote includes RVSM. The Skyways quote has that as a separate line item. They are very close to each other once you account for that. I worked for Duncan 24 years. Honest company that treats their customers and employees well. They will never be the cheapest but do good work.
Duncan is great and yes everyone I have worked with has been amazing. They are more, that’s a fact. Even Skyway is more than what I can get things done for. So Duncan is above that. Just the way it is. Totally a crazy argument that Chip is trying to make. Him saying that unless I pay top dollar I am getting pencil whips is flat out ridiculous.
I am at my plane literally right now with a NDT guy from Duncan. We had another mechanic come open up the panels for the NDT guy. I will get this inspection done for less than half of what it would be if I just did it the normal way. I am here and making sure it’s right. No pencil whips on my plane.
Chip does not agree that jets can be flown and maintained for reasonable cost. He is wrong as there are many guys like myself doing it.
Mike
Attachment: IMG_2463.jpeg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|