06 May 2025, 08:57 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 12:11 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7814 Post Likes: +10199 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Thanks Mike.
Many years ago, before I started Jet Acquisitions, I worked for stocking aircraft dealers that owned aircraft, not my money directly, but the same principle and the money we spent on maintenance effected my commission, so I was paying attention. In one case I was in the office of a shop, me and the owner were screaming so loud that people from outside the building came in to see what was going on. I haven’t had an episode like that in a long time but you can bet that I’ve had some really strong conversations with Stevens, West Star, Textron and even a few small shops.
This narrative that I just drop airplanes off and don’t are about the money because it isn’t mine, is SO wrong… just ask any of my clients.
In spite of what has been said, I treat my client’s money like it’s my own. I see zero relevance of who’s money it is paying for maintenance and believe that’s just a strategy that some on here are using to offset the fact that I have managed and been involved in dozens, maybe hundreds of Citation inspections at a variety of shops, that experience gives me far more insight into this topic than if I’d paid for a few inspections at a single shop.
I hope that in addition to this thread being quite entertaining for many, I have accomplished the goal of communicating that a legacy Citation taken to most maintenance facilities, especially for a phase 5, will likely have a healthy list of airworthy discrepancies.
When the statement was made that a phase 5 should only be a total of $30k “and the rest was the shops profit” I had to say something.
There is really no such thing as “gold plated” shops, maintenance facilities are like any other business, some are better than others, but more than anything else, they all have bad days. Yes, some have nicer facilities and more overhead, they typically charge more, but that doesn’t mean they do a better job, in fact in many cases it’s the opposite. But, it’s also true that many small shops just don’t have the manpower to get the work done properly.
In the course of business I do come across a lot of “lightly maintained” aircraft, but it is rarely the shop that is to blame, in fact I can only remember one incident where the shop was charging the owner and just not doing the work, it was a small shop and when the owner of the shop called me to apologize, he broke down and said he was overwhelmed and was just trying to keep up. The owner had given him an open checkbook and was even paying him a monthly fee to stay on top of the airplane.
In most cases it is actually the owner putting pressure on the shop that causes things to be overlooked. It’s not so much that the ignore things and I am not implying that they disregard safety of flight discrepancies, it’s just that if the shop knows the owner is going to flip out over the bill, they’re less likely to do as thorough of an inspection. It should be that all inspections are equal, but we all know they aren’t.
To help you better understand my position, I do not sell anything, I also do not and have never accepted any compensation from any maintenance facility. I do help my clients occasionally with managing phase inspections after the airplane is in service for a year, but most of the inspections we are involved in are situations where we are paying for the flat rate and the seller is paying for discrepancies. We do a really good job of explaining to the seller what their part of the bill is likely to be, that is exactly why I know so well what the cost involved are. We do typically use larger shops for prebuys because most sellers do not trust a small shop that they may feel is biased towards the buyer.
One more item, if you’re hearing stories about shops holding aircraft hostage, you should tell those folks to handle that in advance, a shop should never hold an airplane based on discrepancies (short of a safety of flight issue that would prevent a ferry permit) if the owner feels like a shop is gouging, their recourse should be to have the shop put the airplane back together and then fly it out of there.
And a final thought as we move on, if you take your aircraft to a small shop, ask for a copy of their liability and hangar keepers insurance. Maybe one of the insurance guys can chime in with details, but I am alarmed to have recently learned that there are some small shops that do not have insurance. They can’t do maintenance cheap enough to make up for that.
And that’s not a fear tactic, that’s a problem all aircraft owners should be aware of!
Last edited on 15 Oct 2023, 14:32, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 12:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/02/16 Posts: 574 Post Likes: +457
Aircraft: D55, C172
|
|
Too funny (not really). I came to BT umpteen years ago after a Cirrus Sevice center wanted $2500 to fix what was a loose alternator belt (stuck in Hilton Head) in a friends 172.(He notified the FAA when I borrowed a wrench) The crappola has never stopped. People really must think we’re stupid or just gullible. I’ve thrown mechanics out of my hangar; I called out a #1 Baron shop when they wanted to replace 2 cylinders they hadn’t even run hot. (They basically told me to leave and not come back) And then got hijacked over at Tarver’s place with a pickup truck guy doing an annual that insisted I needed two new cylinders on the 172 but couldn’t even remember what the compressions were.
We need more Tarver’s in this world and somehow fix this mechanics nightmare we live in. Personally I don’t see why 91 stuff can’t be done by the owner or who the eff anyway.
And lawyers and insurance companies are also ruining everything for everybody. Man we need tort reform.
_________________ Embrace The Suck
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 12:33 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7814 Post Likes: +10199 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The main benefit to using a smaller shop is the acceptance of used parts. There are little valves and doohickeys on these birds that might cost 10-100X new more a used part costs. You can ratchet up a pretty outrageous bill with $25K parts that you could have bought used for $1000.
Mike This is very true, I did have a situation with a tail deice relay on a Beechjet 400A, $25,000 from Textron, we found one at Alliance Airparts for $2200 Amazing thing is the shop that wouldn’t install the ARA part, parked the aircraft outside when everything else was done and the next day they tested the tail deice and it worked. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 14:29 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7814 Post Likes: +10199 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chip
Your post was too long, not reading it. Pretty sure there is nothing more I can learn from you. I think we can agree to disagree. You do you boo.
Mike And here I was being so verbose in my praise of you! I think the thing you hate about me the most is the fact that you can’t help but like me! And only Aubie calls me Boo.
Last edited on 15 Oct 2023, 14:34, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 14:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/16/12 Posts: 7156 Post Likes: +12746 Location: Keller, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: '68 36 (E-19)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chip
Your post was too long, not reading it. Pretty sure there is nothing more I can learn from you. I think we can agree to disagree. You do you boo.
Mike Then there are posts that are short, easy reads, but where you wish the person didn't feel the need to say something they should have just kept to themselves.
_________________ Things are rarely what they seem, but they're always exactly what they are.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 14:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1538 Post Likes: +1454 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chip
Your post was too long, not reading it. Pretty sure there is nothing more I can learn from you. I think we can agree to disagree. You do you boo.
Mike And here I was being so verbose in my praise of you! I think the thing you hate about me the most is the fact that you can’t help but like me! And only Aubie calls me Boo.
So I went and read it mostly because you said you gave me praise. I found that hard to believe. After reading it I feel I didn’t learn anything I didn’t already know. And for sure did not read any positive statements about me or my legacy experience.
You don’t realize that some people also might have some experience. Ironically the shop that held that guys plane ransom is a well known shop that you yourself said you use. I had some maintenance I needed and talk to that shop about my concerns. They understood and I took my plane there. It was a great experience. Although I do think I paid a premium. They did good work and were fair.
I got quotes for my 1-4 from 6 different shops. The top one was Duncan on my field. They were $60k more than the next quote for just the inspection alone. They were over $80k.
You can’t tell me I would have got that much value if I went with them. They also do not allow used or serviceable parts.
Bottom line is I and many others are maintaining Legacy jets affordably. Just because you don’t believe it does not make it false.
Mike
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 17:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/02/16 Posts: 574 Post Likes: +457
Aircraft: D55, C172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: :box: When the boxing gloves come off I look forward to returning to this thread.  It could also be the more attention you give them the more they keep swinging. Best let them go into a corner to themselves and let them have at it. Quite the distraction really.
_________________ Embrace The Suck
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 15 Oct 2023, 23:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/02/16 Posts: 574 Post Likes: +457
Aircraft: D55, C172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chip claiming that Mike C made up his phase 5 cost is another unfair attack.
How many Phase 5 inspections have you done with your own money? My bet is absolutely zero. You use other people’s money to pay high prices then try to claim the guys in the real world are making up numbers because they don’t match your inflated experience.
So how much have you paid for any Phase 5 of a legacy citation out of your pocket?
We have at least 4 guys here that have paid for at least one Phase 5 sharing their experience so let’s hear your experience with your own money?
You do realize all of your numbers are from other peoples spending where you advise them to pay more than they should. Just because you tell someone a phase 5 should cost $80k does not make it true.
Edit- I just added a photo from Skyway on the cost of a 550 Phase 5. This is one of the expert shops in the legacy world. So Chip must know more then these guys.
Mike So correct me if I’m wrong but things really go south cost wise at 10K hrs.
_________________ Embrace The Suck
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Oct 2023, 00:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 2094 Post Likes: +996 Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I told Jan I’d quit going back and forth, so I will… here’s an olive branch, I’ll pay, with my own money, for a Phase 5 on your airplane at Stevens Aviation Nashville, I’ll also hire a mechanic to oversee the inspection, which is exactly what we do for our clients on every Citation prebuy.
I’ll pay for the flat rate and oversight, you pay for all LEGITIMATE airworthiness discrepancies.
Deal? Wait, sorry to back up on the thread, but Chip, what do I need to post about you on BeechTalk to get this same offer?
_________________ Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|