banner
banner

06 May 2025, 05:33 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 989 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 66  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 13 Oct 2023, 21:13 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 7814
Post Likes: +10198
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
One of my mentors in aviation once told me, every single aircraft you transact is a flying lawsuit.

I’ve been doing this for over 20 years, he was in it for 20 before me.

Thankful I have never been sued, unfortunately he has.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 13 Oct 2023, 21:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1538
Post Likes: +1454
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Username Protected wrote:
One of my mentors in aviation once told me, every single aircraft you transact is a flying lawsuit.

I’ve been doing this for over 20 years, he was in it for 20 before me.

Thankful I have never been sued, unfortunately he has.



Chip

What exactly are you saying?

I am starting to think you have some personality issues. These post of yours are not helping your rep.

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 13 Oct 2023, 22:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6060
Post Likes: +708
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
Its useless comparaison.

1-Show me any of these small jets with no TR that I can land on a contaminated runway 3000 ft long with snow or ice and I will buy 1 tomorrow.
2- 1200 nm trip with up to 50 knts headwinds with IFR reserves.

Case close.


Username Protected wrote:
As many of my threads I start are, this one was born out of thread drift on another thread.

The statement was made on the Meridian thread that a Legacy Citation could be operated for less than a Meridian… well, that was the exact wrong aircraft to pick on for op cost!

The Piper PA-46 turbine has long been known as the most economical turbine aircraft you can operate. They are stupid simple and inexpensive to work on, its just a piston airplane with a Pratt on it.

Then the narrative became that I am anti-Legacy Citation, anybody that knows me knows that that is laughable! The first jet that Jet Acquisitions ever acquired was a Citation V! I’d have to look, but we’ve probably done more V/Ultras than any other model of jet. It’s at least tied with Mustangs.

Here’s what I can do, I can demonstrate that a Legacy Citation is as economical to own and operate as any turboprop, save the JetProp/ Meridian and maybe the Piaggio or Eclipse. What’s more is that I can do this without stacking the deck, I’m talking similar acquisition cost and identical maintenance standards. None of this comparing a $600k jet with a $2.6M turboprop or claiming a Phase 5 on a Citation V only cost $30k… real numbers. Apples and apples. The only qualifications that I will add are that we are excluding life limited engine components and extraordinary unexpected expenses due to AD’s, corrosion, etc. The unknowns are always unknown and too hard to quantify.

Ok, my King Air, TBM and Pilatus guys… come at me. Prove me wrong!

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 13 Oct 2023, 22:50 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 7814
Post Likes: +10198
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
One of my mentors in aviation once told me, every single aircraft you transact is a flying lawsuit.

I’ve been doing this for over 20 years, he was in it for 20 before me.

Thankful I have never been sued, unfortunately he has.



Chip

What exactly are you saying?

I am starting to think you have some personality issues. These post of yours are not helping your rep.

Mike


IYKYK

Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 13 Oct 2023, 22:51 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/02/16
Posts: 574
Post Likes: +457
Aircraft: D55, C172
Username Protected wrote:
As many of my threads I start are, this one was born out of thread drift on another thread.

The statement was made on the Meridian thread that a Legacy Citation could be operated for less than a Meridian… well, that was the exact wrong aircraft to pick on for op cost!

The Piper PA-46 turbine has long been known as the most economical turbine aircraft you can operate. They are stupid simple and inexpensive to work on, its just a piston airplane with a Pratt on it.

Then the narrative became that I am anti-Legacy Citation, anybody that knows me knows that that is laughable! The first jet that Jet Acquisitions ever acquired was a Citation V! I’d have to look, but we’ve probably done more V/Ultras than any other model of jet. It’s at least tied with Mustangs.

Here’s what I can do, I can demonstrate that a Legacy Citation is as economical to own and operate as any turboprop, save the JetProp/ Meridian and maybe the Piaggio or Eclipse. What’s more is that I can do this without stacking the deck, I’m talking similar acquisition cost and identical maintenance standards. None of this comparing a $600k jet with a $2.6M turboprop or claiming a Phase 5 on a Citation V only cost $30k… real numbers. Apples and apples. The only qualifications that I will add are that we are excluding life limited engine components and extraordinary unexpected expenses due to AD’s, corrosion, etc. The unknowns are always unknown and too hard to quantify.

Ok, my King Air, TBM and Pilatus guys… come at me. Prove me wrong!


I think Mike C has demonstrated and met your criteria with the 560. I get your point with the 501. But then for some of us, that’s a starting point. And probably a very safe place to start.

BTW. Great presentation Tarv.
_________________
Embrace The Suck


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 13 Oct 2023, 23:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1538
Post Likes: +1454
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Chip

This is the 3rd time I have seen you go after Tarver implying he will or should get sued.

I bought my plane from Tarver. He is a straight shooter and is fair. We had some small issues and he handled them very fair. He has continued to support me years after the sale. He is the first guy I call if I have an issue and he helps. If he were to ever get sued it will be by someone that is totally unreasonable.

And my guess is if he does get sued your name will be brought up. For someone talking
Lawsuits you seem to be getting yourself in a precarious position. I am no lawyer but my guess is one would advise you to back off.

I really do not know what you bring to this group. You are the only BT member that I think does more damage than good. You continually attack the guys adding value. This is not a good place for you to promote your business. In fact the more you say the more I wonder why anyone would do business with you.

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 00:09 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5162
Post Likes: +5122
Aircraft: C501, R66
Username Protected wrote:
One of my mentors in aviation once told me, every single aircraft you transact is a flying lawsuit.

I’ve been doing this for over 20 years, he was in it for 20 before me.

Thankful I have never been sued, unfortunately he has.


There is an old joke in Aviation, What does it take to be an airplane Broker? The answer is a cell phone. What does it take to be a good airplane broker? answer is Answer the cell phone. I’m not a Broker. We own everything we sell and in the unlikely event we have an issue we have enough capital to buy an engine, parts and labor to fix the problem or we could just buy the damn airplane back. Unusual service in this business; rarely needed but available. And extremely few times we’ve had to do this it wasn’t because we had to legally it was because it was the right thing to do.

So I don’t think we’re getting sued anytime soon.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 00:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6410
Post Likes: +5143
Username Protected wrote:
In fact the more you say the more I wonder why anyone would do business with you.


I'd still like to understand who needs a broker's help buying a brand new airplane from the factory, but I also recently watched someone take a bag of ice and proceed to rinse the ice off under water before "using" it

So maybe I'm off base


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 00:56 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 7814
Post Likes: +10198
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
One of my mentors in aviation once told me, every single aircraft you transact is a flying lawsuit.

I’ve been doing this for over 20 years, he was in it for 20 before me.

Thankful I have never been sued, unfortunately he has.


There is an old joke in Aviation, What does it take to be an airplane Broker? The answer is a cell phone. What does it take to be a good airplane broker? answer is Answer the cell phone. I’m not a Broker. We own everything we sell and in the unlikely event we have an issue we have enough capital to buy an engine, parts and labor to fix the problem or we could just buy the damn airplane back. Unusual service in this business; rarely needed but available. And extremely few times we’ve had to do this it wasn’t because we had to legally it was because it was the right thing to do.

So I don’t think we’re getting sued anytime soon.


Michael,

I in no way meant to imply that you would get sued for doing something wrong. Nor would I, nor did my mentor I mentioned.

You don’t have to do anything wrong to get sued.

And no one is going to say its my fault if you do.

If one of those 80 Citations you have sold crashes into a house, you will get sued. That’s what happened to my buddy, he didn’t do anything wrong, just sold an airplane.

One of my other dear friends owned the inventory airplane that crashed into the Flight Safety building in Wichita, guess what happened…

I don’t normally talk specifics publicly, but since I’m being mischaracterized, I wanted to be very clear. This is not some FUD I’m making up, this is the reality the business you’ve jumped into. You’ve done very well, the first time you said how many Citations you sold I didn’t believe you, but I looked and you darned sure did.

I pray that nothing bad happens, but with volume comes exposure and that was my only point.

Last edited on 14 Oct 2023, 01:16, edited 2 times in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 01:06 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 7814
Post Likes: +10198
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
This is not a good place for you to promote your business. In fact the more you say the more I wonder why anyone would do business with you.


You guys continue to think I am here to get people to hire me, once you figure out that is not the case, you’ll understand why I feel free to say what is on my mind.

The fact is I don’t care what you think.

When incorrect or incomplete information gets shared, I point it out. If I screw up and share incorrect information I own it, that’s rare on BT.

My contributions to Beechtalk speak for themselves, no one cares how cheaply you can operate your Citation, as near as I can tell there are exactly four people on here who are impressed, everyone else is here to see what gets said next.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 01:23 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 7814
Post Likes: +10198
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
I'd still like to understand who needs a broker's help buying a brand new airplane from the factory, but I also recently watched someone take a bag of ice and proceed to rinse the ice off under water before "using" it

So maybe I'm off base


So your implication is that there’s this whole group of people, smart and successful enough to buy a brand new private jet for millions of dollars, using someone like me to help them, and they’re stupid?

You guys keep saying I’m attacking you, but it sure seems like you are attacking me, but I’ll say it again… I don’t care. I do get a little defensive when you go after our clients.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 01:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/02/16
Posts: 574
Post Likes: +457
Aircraft: D55, C172
Hey guys….Let’s cool the jets a little. EVERYONE one here has a valid point. Attacks are very counterproductive, and deteriorating to our communal need to keep communication open. That way we get to keep learning.

_________________
Embrace The Suck


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 03:25 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/10
Posts: 890
Post Likes: +710
Username Protected wrote:
500/501/550/560 Facts based on having owned 80+ of these and written every single check with my own hand, parted out 15+, rebuilt 50+ engines and done countless Phase 1-5s.

Engines:
-A midtime used 1A or -4 with a fresh hot is 200-250K to buy now, usually exchange
-A midtime used -5A is $350K exchange
-A freshly hotted timed out on condition motor is $150-175K with good blades
-No one is overhauling anymore but it's $300-450k to overhaul at an ITI/Hale sort of shop.
-Impeller is $60K to replace
-A disk of on condition blades is $75-100K
-An overhauled HT stator is $20-30K outright
-You can regrow short blades for $497 each (71 blades)
-It's 20K to remove and redisk a high turbine disk.
-It's about $2000 a piece to weld a small exit duct, large exit duct and combustion liner
-It's 10-17K to weld a cracked up high turbine stator
-A clean hot section is about $25K now, a really dirty one needing blades could be $150K. Absolutely no difference in quality between a Standard Aero and a quality independent shop, just the price.
-Ignitor box, $2500-5000
-A new to you front fan is $10K

Airframe:
-Replacing a front or side windshield costs $7500 for the part and about 25-35 hrs each
-Replacing a back window is $900 and takes about 5 hours each after interior removal
-An air cycle machine costs about 12K used and is 15-17 to overhaul
-Air cycle machine turbo is about 5K and is usually the failure
-Freon system pretty easy to repair, usually a motor or compressor running 2-5K
-Pressurization controller 5K
-Engine gauge, $2,500
-Never see corrosion issues
-Actuators costs about 2-5K
-A Phase 1-4 takes two men about a week to do properly
-A Phase 5 takes two men about 10 days to do properly
-Paint is about 45K
-An interior is 60-80K
-A Phase 49 is about $1000
-oxygen hydro $100
-Nitrogen hydro $175
-Fire bottles with new squibs about $800
-New nitrogen bottle, $7500
-New oxygen bottle, $2500
-Brakes, $1750 a side
-Tire, $1300 each for mains, $900 for nose
-Wheel, 5-7.5K
-Antiskid sensor, $2500
-Fix antilock brake motor, $5K
-replace TR actuator or speed brake actuator, $2,500
-Anti-ice valve, $2,500
-Deice boot, $7500 installed for a wing and $3-4K for a tail boot.
-Deice boot ejector valve, $1000

Avionics
-Replace RVSM computer, usually $500 unless you have a Shadin system then it's $5K
-HSI/ADI, $2,500
-Inverter $800
-ASI, VSI, etc. $1000
-An RVSM check is about $1,500
-Autopilot rarely breaks, a computer is 2-5K, a servo is 2K
-Install two 750s, $60Kish depending on the shop
-Install full Garmin panel, Under $300K
-Lighting inverter, $500
-Autopilot preselector, $2,500
-Standby gyro, $1,500
-Generator control unit, $2,500
-Starter gen, overhauled, $1800
-Pressurization solonoid valve, $5,500
-Ailerons, flaps, and airframe parts are cheap
-10K hour inspection, $15K, much much cheaper on the 560.
-Broken Step, $5K

Operating/Owner Costs

-Fuel 150 GPH for a 501, 165 for a 550, 190 for a 560, BLOCK
-120, 140, 180 respectively max power cruise altitude
-90, 110, NO idea for the 560 long range cruise
-Maintenance, me, owning a shop and having near free parts, under 10K a year
-You, basic shop assuming $100/hour, $25K a year
-You, Gold plated sort of shop, $60K a year
-Insurance, 10-30K a year depending on YOU and the plane

---------------------
Narrative: I think you're going to find that these airplanes are extremely well made and rarely break. They are built like little airliners. They like to be flown and do not like to sit. The parts cost I outlined are for serviceable used parts. I haven't found the parts to cost more than any other brand of aircraft and I find they consume less parts on average than a pressurized twin recap. They aren't finicky machines.

Most common squawks I see AND don't see on these:

1) anti-ice idiot light system is complicated. Everything heats but the lights don't extinguish. The solenoid valves can fail if not flown regularly.
2) Rarely see pressurization issues
3) Freon systems are usually neglected on ALL airplanes, including these, usually an expansion valve, leak or receiver dryer
4) Rarely see autopilot issues, it's usually the preselector
5) Missing digits on engine gauges, most live with it
6) Rarely see boot issues, almost never
7) Battery lasts 3-4 years and then fails a cap check, $3,500
8) Oxygen systems can leak, unplug your masks and leave on crew when shutdown
9) Missing placards, $500 for the kit
10) Virtually never see any corrosion of a serious nature
11) Frayed accessory control cable, $1000, rare but I see it.
12) lots of relays and can lose one occasionally; under $1K to replace usually
13) Stator valve (engine), $2,500

--------------------------------

Whatever it costs, it's totally worth it. They are smooth, fast, quiet, safe and enjoyable. If the possibility of any of these numbers scares you then it's not for you. When I see an airplane with a bunch of squawks, it usually means the owner didn't care and ran it into the ground. Now, I am seeing a lot of time and love going back into these machines.

Dip your toes in the water, it's nice.


We need more posts like this.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 04:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/02/16
Posts: 574
Post Likes: +457
Aircraft: D55, C172
Username Protected wrote:
500/501/550/560 Facts based on having owned 80+ of these and written every single check with my own hand, parted out 15+, rebuilt 50+ engines and done countless Phase 1-5s.

Engines:
-A midtime used 1A or -4 with a fresh hot is 200-250K to buy now, usually exchange
-A midtime used -5A is $350K exchange
-A freshly hotted timed out on condition motor is $150-175K with good blades
-No one is overhauling anymore but it's $300-450k to overhaul at an ITI/Hale sort of shop.
-Impeller is $60K to replace
-A disk of on condition blades is $75-100K
-An overhauled HT stator is $20-30K outright
-You can regrow short blades for $497 each (71 blades)
-It's 20K to remove and redisk a high turbine disk.
-It's about $2000 a piece to weld a small exit duct, large exit duct and combustion liner
-It's 10-17K to weld a cracked up high turbine stator
-A clean hot section is about $25K now, a really dirty one needing blades could be $150K. Absolutely no difference in quality between a Standard Aero and a quality independent shop, just the price.
-Ignitor box, $2500-5000
-A new to you front fan is $10K

Airframe:
-Replacing a front or side windshield costs $7500 for the part and about 25-35 hrs each
-Replacing a back window is $900 and takes about 5 hours each after interior removal
-An air cycle machine costs about 12K used and is 15-17 to overhaul
-Air cycle machine turbo is about 5K and is usually the failure
-Freon system pretty easy to repair, usually a motor or compressor running 2-5K
-Pressurization controller 5K
-Engine gauge, $2,500
-Never see corrosion issues
-Actuators costs about 2-5K
-A Phase 1-4 takes two men about a week to do properly
-A Phase 5 takes two men about 10 days to do properly
-Paint is about 45K
-An interior is 60-80K
-A Phase 49 is about $1000
-oxygen hydro $100
-Nitrogen hydro $175
-Fire bottles with new squibs about $800
-New nitrogen bottle, $7500
-New oxygen bottle, $2500
-Brakes, $1750 a side
-Tire, $1300 each for mains, $900 for nose
-Wheel, 5-7.5K
-Antiskid sensor, $2500
-Fix antilock brake motor, $5K
-replace TR actuator or speed brake actuator, $2,500
-Anti-ice valve, $2,500
-Deice boot, $7500 installed for a wing and $3-4K for a tail boot.
-Deice boot ejector valve, $1000

Avionics
-Replace RVSM computer, usually $500 unless you have a Shadin system then it's $5K
-HSI/ADI, $2,500
-Inverter $800
-ASI, VSI, etc. $1000
-An RVSM check is about $1,500
-Autopilot rarely breaks, a computer is 2-5K, a servo is 2K
-Install two 750s, $60Kish depending on the shop
-Install full Garmin panel, Under $300K
-Lighting inverter, $500
-Autopilot preselector, $2,500
-Standby gyro, $1,500
-Generator control unit, $2,500
-Starter gen, overhauled, $1800
-Pressurization solonoid valve, $5,500
-Ailerons, flaps, and airframe parts are cheap
-10K hour inspection, $15K, much much cheaper on the 560.
-Broken Step, $5K

Operating/Owner Costs

-Fuel 150 GPH for a 501, 165 for a 550, 190 for a 560, BLOCK
-120, 140, 180 respectively max power cruise altitude
-90, 110, NO idea for the 560 long range cruise
-Maintenance, me, owning a shop and having near free parts, under 10K a year
-You, basic shop assuming $100/hour, $25K a year
-You, Gold plated sort of shop, $60K a year
-Insurance, 10-30K a year depending on YOU and the plane

---------------------
Narrative: I think you're going to find that these airplanes are extremely well made and rarely break. They are built like little airliners. They like to be flown and do not like to sit. The parts cost I outlined are for serviceable used parts. I haven't found the parts to cost more than any other brand of aircraft and I find they consume less parts on average than a pressurized twin recap. They aren't finicky machines.

Most common squawks I see AND don't see on these:

1) anti-ice idiot light system is complicated. Everything heats but the lights don't extinguish. The solenoid valves can fail if not flown regularly.
2) Rarely see pressurization issues
3) Freon systems are usually neglected on ALL airplanes, including these, usually an expansion valve, leak or receiver dryer
4) Rarely see autopilot issues, it's usually the preselector
5) Missing digits on engine gauges, most live with it
6) Rarely see boot issues, almost never
7) Battery lasts 3-4 years and then fails a cap check, $3,500
8) Oxygen systems can leak, unplug your masks and leave on crew when shutdown
9) Missing placards, $500 for the kit
10) Virtually never see any corrosion of a serious nature
11) Frayed accessory control cable, $1000, rare but I see it.
12) lots of relays and can lose one occasionally; under $1K to replace usually
13) Stator valve (engine), $2,500

--------------------------------

Whatever it costs, it's totally worth it. They are smooth, fast, quiet, safe and enjoyable. If the possibility of any of these numbers scares you then it's not for you. When I see an airplane with a bunch of squawks, it usually means the owner didn't care and ran it into the ground. Now, I am seeing a lot of time and love going back into these machines.

Dip your toes in the water, it's nice.


We need more posts like this.


Yep. Lot of knowledge there.
_________________
Embrace The Suck


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 14 Oct 2023, 10:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6410
Post Likes: +5143
Username Protected wrote:
So your implication is that there’s this whole group of people, smart and successful enough to buy a brand new private jet for millions of dollars, using someone like me to help them, and they’re stupid?


I didn’t imply anything, I said I don’t understand it- I will say, if you think having or spending millions of dollars on a purchase makes you intelligent or even successful, you’ve got a lot more people to meet in this world

And because I don’t understand it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t make sense for others- it’s good that you are able to find and service those types of people, someone’s gotta clean the ice!


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 989 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 66  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.