07 May 2025, 00:01 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Before the U-2  Posted: 03 Sep 2023, 11:01 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 08/03/13
Posts: 2447
Post Likes: +4839
Location: SW Colorado
Aircraft: C182
|
|
|
Really interesting. Thanks!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Before the U-2 Posted: 03 Sep 2023, 18:05 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/15/17
Posts: 1053
Post Likes: +546
Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
|
The other reconnaissance plane that does not have a lot of info on how it performed or what it did is the RB-57F. I think I saw once once at one of the AMA semi-official museums.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Before the U-2 Posted: 03 Sep 2023, 22:07 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 11/20/16
Posts: 7067
Post Likes: +9324
Location: Austin, TX area
Aircraft: OPA
|
|
|
NASA had some WB-57s that I worked a time or two.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Before the U-2 Posted: 03 Sep 2023, 22:13 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/21/11
Posts: 710
Post Likes: +902
Location: Northside of Atlanta
Aircraft: RV-6 & RV-10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The other reconnaissance plane that does not have a lot of info on how it performed or what it did is the RB-57F. I think I saw once once at one of the AMA semi-official museums. Best talk I ever attended at Oshkosh was by an RB-57 guy. Talked about sampling nuke tests and taking pictures of everything south of Brownsville. They attached the extra pod jets if the mission called for max altitude - the pod jets gave them a few thousand feet. Otherwise flew without them and had additional range/endurance. Presenter said the airplane was a plus/minus 80K' airframe, depending on OAT... Very, very interesting.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Before the U-2 Posted: 01 Oct 2023, 12:00 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/03/15
Posts: 113
Post Likes: +124
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
Username Protected wrote: NASA had some WB-57s that I worked a time or two. NASA still has three WB-57 aircraft, based at Ellington Field. In fact, 10 years ago, they got their third WB back after it was taken out of the Boneyard. It hadn't flown in over 41 years. Former U-2 pilot Tom Parent flew it to Houston where it now works. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-spac ... 180970371/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Before the U-2 Posted: 01 Oct 2023, 12:01 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/03/15
Posts: 113
Post Likes: +124
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
Username Protected wrote: NASA had some WB-57s that I worked a time or two. NASA still has three WB-57 aircraft, based at Ellington Field. In fact, 10 years ago, they got their third WB back after it was taken out of the Boneyard. It hadn't flown in over 41 years. Former U-2 pilot Tom Parent flew it to Houston where it now works. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-spac ... 180970371/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|
