| 
	
	| 
		
		31 Oct 2025, 10:10 [ UTC - 5; DST ] |  
	| 
	
  
	
	
	
	
		
			| Username Protected | Message |  
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  24 Dec 2019, 19:20  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 01/29/08
 Posts: 26338
 Post Likes: +13085
 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
 Aircraft: PC12NG
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: The Icon A5 looks awesome.  Then I read it has a no-fuel payload of 430 pounds.  That's two grown men and 7 gallons of gas.
 Is the plan for all the owners to cheat a bit on weight?
 
 Someone tell me how this works out in real life.
 Curious what you think looks awesome about the A5?  Looks like an awesome traveling machine?  Or looks like fun?
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  20 Jan 2023, 23:32  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 10/06/17
 Posts: 3209
 Post Likes: +2703
 Location: san diego
 Aircraft: G35 / Acroduster
 |  | 
				
					| The airplane aside, it's a shame what happened to that company which at one time had so much promise.  I think it would make a good case-study of how not  to run a start up.  Oh well.  Plenty like them in the history books but I followed this one pretty closely and had high hopes for them and the good, they could have done for general aviation. _________________
 A&P / IA
 G-35
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  21 Jan 2023, 09:35  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				|  
 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 04/26/13
 Posts: 21871
 Post Likes: +22516
 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
 Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: The airplane aside, it's a shame what happened to that company which at one time had so much promise.  I think it would make a good case-study of how not  to run a start up.  Oh well.  Plenty like them in the history books but I followed this one pretty closely and had high hopes for them and the good, they could have done for general aviation. You speak as if they’re dead; they’re still in business.  Admittedly they are their own worst enemy, but they’re still making airplanes, which is a lot more than can be said for some other promising brands._________________
 My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  21 Jan 2023, 13:00  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 10/06/17
 Posts: 3209
 Post Likes: +2703
 Location: san diego
 Aircraft: G35 / Acroduster
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: You speak as if they’re dead; they’re still in business.  Admittedly they are their own worst enemy, but they’re still making airplanes, which is a lot more than can be said for some other promising brands. That is true and I still wish them the very best.  I just wish they had lived up to their potential and what they so publicly claimed about themselves.  I think it's a little late for that now, oh well._________________
 A&P / IA
 G-35
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  21 Jan 2023, 13:18  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				|  
  
 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 12/10/07
 Posts: 35680
 Post Likes: +14142
 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
 Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: I had a chance to take up an A5 today at Jack Brown's.  I gotta say, definitely a fun flying airplane.   JOOC, what did all of this fun cost?_________________
 -lance
 
 It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  21 Jan 2023, 15:08  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 01/03/17
 Posts: 661
 Post Likes: +837
 Location: Owego, NY (Hangar @ KBGM)
 Aircraft: Baron B55
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: I had a chance to take up an A5 today at Jack Brown's.  I gotta say, definitely a fun flying airplane.   JOOC, what did all of this fun cost?
 I did a solid hour for $300. I thought it was well worth it. Tons of fun.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  21 Jan 2023, 20:49  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				|  
 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 04/26/13
 Posts: 21871
 Post Likes: +22516
 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
 Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: [I just wish they had lived up to their potential and what they so publicly claimed about themselves. I think what they claimed was unrealistic.  They marketed it like a Jetski, to people with little or no flying experience.  If it had actually sold like one, I’m afraid that the resulting carnage would have been worse than their relative lack of success._________________
 My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  22 Jan 2023, 15:26  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 03/28/17
 Posts: 8906
 Post Likes: +11301
 Location: N. California
 Aircraft: C-182
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: looks awesome, but holy cow what a dubious history.
 google "Icon A5 crash" and make sure you're sitting down.  over-priced, and under-performing from what I see.
 
 for half the price you could have an Air-Cam, the safety of 2 motors, and a very good history.
 Exactly. The crashes have probably been attributed to inexperienced pilots or cowboys, but I don't think I'd want to have a passenger in one, my weight notwithstanding.  
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  22 Jan 2023, 17:11  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				|  
 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 04/26/13
 Posts: 21871
 Post Likes: +22516
 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
 Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: Exactly. The crashes have probably been attributed to inexperienced pilots or cowboys, but I don't think I'd want to have a passenger in one, my weight notwithstanding.  From what I remember, it doesn’t have enough useful load for full fuel and two normal sized people, never mind heavy ones. I also recall what seemed to be a preponderance of crashes that were the result of Icon company demo pilots being stupid._________________
 My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  22 Jan 2023, 18:39  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 10/06/17
 Posts: 3209
 Post Likes: +2703
 Location: san diego
 Aircraft: G35 / Acroduster
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: I also recall what seemed to be a preponderance of crashes that were the result of Icon company demo pilots being stupid. Their chief engineer Jon Karkow somehow flew one of their new hires into a canyon they couldn't fly themselves out of.  A really smart person doing something really stupid.  2 fatalities.   It was a real tragedy for the company and their reputation.  The timing was such, that it may have been the straw that broke the camel's back.  (So-to-speak.)_________________
 A&P / IA
 G-35
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  22 Jan 2023, 23:47  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 07/14/11
 Posts: 801
 Post Likes: +958
 Aircraft: Bonanza V35
 |  | 
				
					| The problem I have with this plane is the price vs the utility.  Too slow to be a x-country plane and too small to take waves over 18" or so.
 I would rather have a flying RIB wing for $20k.  True ultralight with nearly zero maintenance and a lot of utility.  After that, I would probably do a SeaRay with a 915is for $125k if I wanted to go faster.
 
 The Icon is cool, but not worth the $ IMO.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  22 Jan 2023, 23:54  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				|  
  
 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 12/10/07
 Posts: 35680
 Post Likes: +14142
 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
 Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: The problem I have with this plane is the price vs the utility.  Too slow to be a x-country plane and too small to take waves over 18" or so.
 I would rather have a flying RIB wing for $20k.  True ultralight with nearly zero maintenance and a lot of utility.  After that, I would probably do a SeaRay with a 915is for $125k if I wanted to go faster.
 
 The Icon is cool, but not worth the $ IMO.
 What's a "RIB wing"?_________________
 -lance
 
 It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  22 Jan 2023, 23:58  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				| 
 |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 07/14/11
 Posts: 801
 Post Likes: +958
 Aircraft: Bonanza V35
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: The problem I have with this plane is the price vs the utility.  Too slow to be a x-country plane and too small to take waves over 18" or so.
 I would rather have a flying RIB wing for $20k.  True ultralight with nearly zero maintenance and a lot of utility.  After that, I would probably do a SeaRay with a 915is for $125k if I wanted to go faster.
 
 The Icon is cool, but not worth the $ IMO.
 What's a "RIB wing"?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N8kxIO2Dsw
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |  
	
			| Username Protected | 
				
				
					|  Post subject: Re: Icon A5  Posted:  23 Jan 2023, 08:26  |  |  
			| 
			
				
					|  |  |  
 |  
				|  
 
 |  
					|  |  
|   
 
 
 
 Joined: 04/26/13
 Posts: 21871
 Post Likes: +22516
 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
 Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
 |  | 
				
					| Username Protected wrote: The problem I have with this plane is the price vs the utility.  Too slow to be a x-country plane and too small to take waves over 18" or so.
 I would rather have a flying RIB wing for $20k.  True ultralight with nearly zero maintenance and a lot of utility.  After that, I would probably do a SeaRay with a 915is for $125k if I wanted to go faster.
 
 The Icon is cool, but not worth the $ IMO.
 I think that the bulk of the technical problems stem from an insistence to make it an LSA.  If they discarded the weight restriction, raised the HP and structural strength just a bit, they could make it into something more useful.  It isn't like it needs to be a Widgeon, it just needs to be able to carry two normal sized people, a couple of weekend bags, and enough gas to go somewhere.  Oh, and be able to handle a wave larger than a ripple; say, maybe something like a boat wake.  I mean, who'd have thought those might be out there?_________________
 My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |  |    
	|  | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 You cannot post attachments in this forum
 
 |    
 | Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us 
 BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a 
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include 
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, 
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
 
 BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. 
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
 
 Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
 
 
 | 
 |  |  |