10 May 2025, 06:41 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 17 Jan 2023, 12:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/20 Posts: 228 Post Likes: +177 Location: KLOU/KJVY
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wanted to brag on my bird a bit. Highest ever GS and TAS yesterday on our way home from KAXX. Our normal TAS is 365 but was cruising at 372 yesterday. The big difference is that we nearly maxed out the nose baggage. Normally when we are going to fill the nose I will remove the 130lbs of rocks I keep there as ballast for CG. But in this case the plane was going to be sitting out at KAXX and snow was forecast during our stay. I was worried about snow accumulating on the horizontal stabilizer with an empty nose so I left the rocks in. Maybe having extra weight in the nose allowed the extra 7 knots of TAS? Attachment: PXL_20230116_232031512.jpg Awesome GS!! Typically being far aft CG increases TAS...
_________________ -Citation 501 -Robinson R66
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 17 Jan 2023, 14:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3499 Post Likes: +2473 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wanted to brag on my bird a bit. Highest ever GS and TAS yesterday on our way home from KAXX. Our normal TAS is 365 but was cruising at 372 yesterday. What was the temp? ISA- sure helps.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 17 Jan 2023, 14:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1610 Post Likes: +1681 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wanted to brag on my bird a bit. Highest ever GS and TAS yesterday on our way home from KAXX. Our normal TAS is 365 but was cruising at 372 yesterday. What was the temp? ISA- sure helps. Ah, good question. OAT is displayed on the copilot PFD (vs TAT on mine) and I didn't think to look over there. The forecast from the night before in FF was for ISA+1. I'll make sure to note OAT next time.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 17 Jan 2023, 16:22 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5165 Post Likes: +5125
Aircraft: C501, R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wanted to brag on my bird a bit. Highest ever GS and TAS yesterday on our way home from KAXX. Our normal TAS is 365 but was cruising at 372 yesterday. The big difference is that we nearly maxed out the nose baggage. Normally when we are going to fill the nose I will remove the 130lbs of rocks I keep there as ballast for CG. But in this case the plane was going to be sitting out at KAXX and snow was forecast during our stay. I was worried about snow accumulating on the horizontal stabilizer with an empty nose so I left the rocks in. Maybe having extra weight in the nose allowed the extra 7 knots of TAS? Attachment: PXL_20230116_232031512.jpg I will brag on Chris' bird also, it's the fastest 501 I've ever flown also.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 17 Jan 2023, 23:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19981 Post Likes: +25040 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wanted to brag on my bird a bit. My turn. Attachment: n618k-fast-1.png Got up to 535 GS later as winds picked up a bit. I wasn't at max power, either, but backed off a bit. Was close to Vmo and didn't want to go over. I don't normally operate at FL330, but thee was a big tailwind at that altitude and I was curious how it would do. At FL400/410, I get about 410 KTAS. Quote: Maybe having extra weight in the nose allowed the extra 7 knots of TAS? Tail heavy is faster, so what you noticed is opposite of the underlying mechanism. My plane operates near the rear CG limit much of the time which makes it fast. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 18 Jan 2023, 02:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 2917 Post Likes: +1510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My plane operates near the rear CG limit much of the time which makes it fast.
Mike, do you notice any pitch stability issues with the CG near the rear limit, such as in turbulence?
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 18 Jan 2023, 10:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19981 Post Likes: +25040 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mike, do you notice any pitch stability issues with the CG near the rear limit, such as in turbulence? Not particularly. Since being near the rear CG means you fly with a slightly reduced AOA and slightly faster, turbulence will be a little more noticeable, but the effect is tiny. I haven't noticed lacking pitch stability. I spent 13 years flying a tail heavy MU2, so perhaps I am just used to it. It is much easier to fix a tail heavy Citation than a nose heavy one due to the nose baggage being so far forward of the CG. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 18 Jan 2023, 10:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/20 Posts: 228 Post Likes: +177 Location: KLOU/KJVY
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wanted to brag on my bird a bit. My turn. Attachment: n618k-fast-1.png Got up to 535 GS later as winds picked up a bit. I wasn't at max power, either, but backed off a bit. Was close to Vmo and didn't want to go over. I don't normally operate at FL330, but thee was a big tailwind at that altitude and I was curious how it would do. At FL400/410, I get about 410 KTAS. Quote: Maybe having extra weight in the nose allowed the extra 7 knots of TAS? Tail heavy is faster, so what you noticed is opposite of the underlying mechanism. My plane operates near the rear CG limit much of the time which makes it fast. Mike C. That's cheating mike, because this is a 501 thread.
_________________ -Citation 501 -Robinson R66
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 18 Jan 2023, 11:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1610 Post Likes: +1681 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Maybe having extra weight in the nose allowed the extra 7 knots of TAS? Tail heavy is faster, so what you noticed is opposite of the underlying mechanism. My plane operates near the rear CG limit much of the time which makes it fast. Normally, I am right up against the aft CG limit as well. Here is a typical flight for us:
Attachment: IMG_0178.PNG And here is the "nose heavy" config from Monday:
Attachment: IMG_0179.PNG So maybe there is such a thing as being too tail heavy (while still within limits) for max TAS? It's a single data point. Could have been temperature related as Clint noted. Anyway, I was thrilled to see those numbers!
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 18 Jan 2023, 12:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19981 Post Likes: +25040 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's cheating mike, because this is a 501 thread. I agree, having a Citation V is cheating. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 18 Jan 2023, 12:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19981 Post Likes: +25040 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So maybe there is such a thing as being too tail heavy (while still within limits) for max TAS? No, not usually. The further back you go, the less tail downforce you have, thus the less total lift you need to make. At far enough back, the tail force can actually go positive as well. Quote: Could have been temperature related as Clint noted. Probably the reason. Temperature has a pretty big effect on these planes. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 19 Jan 2023, 11:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/10 Posts: 1561 Post Likes: +1809 Company: D&M Leasing Houston Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wanted to brag on my bird a bit. Highest ever GS and TAS yesterday on our way home from KAXX. Our normal TAS is 365 but was cruising at 372 yesterday. The big difference is that we nearly maxed out the nose baggage. Normally when we are going to fill the nose I will remove the 130lbs of rocks I keep there as ballast for CG. But in this case the plane was going to be sitting out at KAXX and snow was forecast during our stay. I was worried about snow accumulating on the horizontal stabilizer with an empty nose so I left the rocks in. Maybe having extra weight in the nose allowed the extra 7 knots of TAS? Attachment: PXL_20230116_232031512.jpg I don't think I would have sold my 501sp if I saw TAS anywhere close to that. Mine were typically in the 330-340's.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 19 Jan 2023, 21:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/20 Posts: 228 Post Likes: +177 Location: KLOU/KJVY
|
|
I'll take some ceramic coating if that's the kind of true airspeed I can get!
_________________ -Citation 501 -Robinson R66
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|