05 May 2025, 02:01 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 04 Oct 2022, 14:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6410 Post Likes: +5143
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My friend who manages a phenom 100 Said his 10 year inspection bill is going to be around $500,000. There’s nothing like this that exists on any Citation. There is something more in play here, the last I saw the gear inspection/overhaul on a 100 and 300 is estimated at $80-$100k. 500k has a lot of other items included. Brad
Could it be the Stevens tax? Maybe jobs like those explain the banner above touting $50k maintenance freebies or the "outstanding parties" they throw
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 04 Oct 2022, 14:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/05/09 Posts: 1166 Post Likes: +446 Location: Charleston, SC (KJZI)
Aircraft: Phenom 300, Bell 505
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My friend who manages a phenom 100 Said his 10 year inspection bill is going to be around $500,000. There’s nothing like this that exists on any Citation. That doesn't seem accurate. For my 2010 Phenom 100 the 10Y inspection was ~$100K. The 10Y landing gear overhaul cost ~$120K, which is certainly expensive; however, the gear o/h price is coming down now that there is competition in the market. The Phenom 300 is perhaps 10% more.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 04 Oct 2022, 17:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/05/09 Posts: 1166 Post Likes: +446 Location: Charleston, SC (KJZI)
Aircraft: Phenom 300, Bell 505
|
|
By the way there is a thread from a year or two ago called "The Best Light Jet is..." in Brand X Talk. (Not sure how to link)
I now fly the Phenom 300 after putting about 1000 hours in the Phenom 100. The Phenom 100 was a great airplane. If the 100 had a couple hundred more pounds of thrust and 300lbs of extra fuel it would be stellar. I wondered why Embraer didn't name the Phenom 300 the Phenom 200, afterall it came out after the 100. Now I know, its because the Phenom 300 is 3x better. The 300 is simply an amazing machine, climbs straight to FL450 at max gross. Both Phenoms are built using the same engineering and LRU architecture as the Embraer regional jets; they're essentially small ERJs. There is a reason why NetJets and JetSuite fly the Phenoms.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 04 Oct 2022, 17:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/16/09 Posts: 7209 Post Likes: +2092 Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: BE-TBD
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is a reason why NetJets and JetSuite fly the Phenoms. NetJets flies a bunch of Cessna's as well.
_________________ AI generated post. Any misrepresentation, inaccuracies or omissions not attributable to member.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 04 Oct 2022, 17:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/07/11 Posts: 790 Post Likes: +452 Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My friend who manages a phenom 100 Said his 10 year inspection bill is going to be around $500,000. There’s nothing like this that exists on any Citation. Was it parked on Sanibel Island last week? ROFL - $500,000. Maybe he needs to find a new profession if he’s managing costs at that level. Chip-
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 04 Oct 2022, 19:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/30/09 Posts: 989 Post Likes: +791
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is a reason why NetJets and JetSuite fly the Phenoms. NetJets flies a bunch of Cessna's as well.
Yes, they do. However, it’s all bigger stuff (Longitude, Latitude) no CJ’s. My guess is that 300 is a big reason for that.
There is no doubt that the CJ is a great airframe, but the 300 does give it competition and the 300 is the best selling light jet every year for the last 9 or 10 years running. There is a reason.
Brad
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 04 Oct 2022, 20:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 1998 Post Likes: +2037
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
The phenom cabins are significantly better than CJ ones. I cannot imagine paying netjet fees and riding in a CJ cabin with my shoulder rubbing the wall the entire time. Nothing against CJs, sweet planes, but unless you are a small human they leave a lot to be desired. I thought the MU2 cabin was more comfortable. I have been in a p300 with 7 others. It was fine, although, no Piaggio 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 05 Oct 2022, 06:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/23/18 Posts: 796 Post Likes: +1198
Aircraft: Aerostar
|
|
Username Protected wrote: By the way there is a thread from a year or two ago called "The Best Light Jet is..." in Brand X Talk. (Not sure how to link)
I now fly the Phenom 300 after putting about 1000 hours in the Phenom 100. The Phenom 100 was a great airplane. If the 100 had a couple hundred more pounds of thrust and 300lbs of extra fuel it would be stellar. I wondered why Embraer didn't name the Phenom 300 the Phenom 200, afterall it came out after the 100. Now I know, its because the Phenom 300 is 3x better. The 300 is simply an amazing machine, climbs straight to FL450 at max gross. Both Phenoms are built using the same engineering and LRU architecture as the Embraer regional jets; they're essentially small ERJs. There is a reason why NetJets and JetSuite fly the Phenoms. viewtopic.php?f=49&t=165308&hilit=%E2%80%9CLight+jet%E2%80%9D+Best 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 16 Oct 2022, 19:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 113 Post Likes: +124
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
Made in America versus not Made in America.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 16 Oct 2022, 21:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/30/09 Posts: 989 Post Likes: +791
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Made in America versus not Made in America. Yep, Melbourne Florida vs Wichita 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What are pros/cons of Phenom vs. single pilot CJ? Posted: 27 Oct 2022, 09:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19938 Post Likes: +25007 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don’t recall the exact specifics but was at Page AZ airport in the summer and a charter Phenom 100 could not take off. The pilot said the hot short runway performance was horrible. Said he wished they were in a CJ or Phenom 300. He wasn’t impressed with the 100. The PW600 series engines are a bit wheezy. That is by design, make them small and efficient. So the Eclipse, Mustang, P100 will not have great high and hot capability. The CJ with FJ44 and P300 with PW535 have much bigger engines, with corresponding more fuel usage. For my V, I can depart at max weight up to 40 C ambient, and up to 45 C if I drop 900 lbs. 45 C is the maximum allowed temperature (ISA + 39). I suspect there are very few days above 45 C in Page, AZ, (maybe never?). The air conditioning on my plane would struggle to deal with a 45 C surface temperature. It won't be pleasant. Living in AZ isn't for me. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|