30 Jan 2026, 18:16 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 21:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21190 Post Likes: +26677 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mike C - what’s been impression of Citation vs Mu2 after 35 hours of ops…. The MU2 is more reliable and burns a lot less fuel. Still in the early stages of getting the V properly debugged, so it isn't quite fair to compare a plane I've had for 13 years with one I just got. My last achievement was getting the Freon AC fixed last weekend. Still got a fair list of minor things to work on. Getting things all setup with fixing things, maintenance, paperwork, etc, has been a lot of work. The V is pretty easy to fly. I'm right in the zone where I think I know how to fly it, but probably don't. I am starting to fly it single pilot, the SIC mentor is now doing nothing. That's quite a shift to get used to and a lot of work for me now, which will abate when I get more used to things. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 04:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3244 Post Likes: +1704
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How much simpler this would be if there was a CE-500S type rating, allows flying CE-500 single pilot (all of them).
No stupid SPE, no confusion on who can fly or not fly 501/551, simple.
Mike C.[/quote
You did so much for the MU2 fuel controller issue .You obviously know how to deal with FAA . Why don’t you make this your pet project . To really make this work, I think you'd need Cessna's support and backing. They have experience getting the Single Pilot Exemption approved, after all.
The question is whether Cessna would be interested. I could see a business case for and against.
I also could see some resistance on safety grounds to a general 500 series SP rating for the bigger planes like the 560. How much training and prior experience should be required to fly a 560 with the proposed 500 SP rating? It's bound to be more than for a 501. So if they approve an all-encompassing SP rating for the 500 series, that might actually increase the requirements to fly a 501 above what they are now.
And I don't think the CJ4/CJ analogy will work here.
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 11:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21190 Post Likes: +26677 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August. I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that. Before: Attachment: 560-0149-old-panel.png After: Attachment: n61gk-panel-1.png Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue. The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now. I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves. We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 12:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21190 Post Likes: +26677 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: To really make this work, I think you'd need Cessna's support and backing. They have experience getting the Single Pilot Exemption approved, after all. Cessna no longer maintains an active SPE. The original one, 4050, is from 1984. Textron's last SPE timed out in 2012. It should be noted that Textron owns Flightsafety and they maintain an SPE. Quote: The question is whether Cessna would be interested. Don't need Textron involved to do this. Textron can't be against it since that would alienate customers, so they will be at least quiet if not actively support it. Quote: I also could see some resistance on safety grounds to a general 500 series SP rating for the bigger planes like the 560. The SPE applies to 500 and 560 alike, no difference, so this wouldn't be any different. Quote: How much training and prior experience should be required to fly a 560 with the proposed 500 SP rating? Same as the 500, 550, S550. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 14:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2101 Post Likes: +2216
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August. I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that. Before: Attachment: 560-0149-old-panel.png After: Attachment: n61gk-panel-1.png Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue. The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now. I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves. We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane. Mike C.
What is fuel burn at Fl410 and 425kts?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 15:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3244 Post Likes: +1704
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August. I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that. Before: Attachment: 560-0149-old-panel.png After: Attachment: n61gk-panel-1.png Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue. The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now. I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves. We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane. Mike C. That looks great, Mike! I don't even want to think about how much it cost...
I see the backup attitude indicator. Air-driven co-pilots AI is gone. Is there a third independent attitude source?
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 15:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/17/21 Posts: 92 Post Likes: +42
Aircraft: C550
|
|
|
James Crossno , I’m flying Jet Techs 550 demo & STC plane for the GTN 750 & TXI 700. No problems great installation .
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 16:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/09 Posts: 4813 Post Likes: +2520 Company: retired corporate mostly Location: Chico,California KCIC/CL56
Aircraft: 1956 Champion 7EC
|
|
Quote: The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. Impressive!
_________________ Jeff
soloed in a land of Superhomers/1959 Cessna 150, retired with Proline 21/ CJ4.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 21:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2101 Post Likes: +2216
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August. I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that. Before: Attachment: 560-0149-old-panel.png After: Attachment: n61gk-panel-1.png Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue. The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now. I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves. We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane. Mike C.
Mike - if u removed the pedestal where did the AP controls end up? The Ulta I flew in had it all down there
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 03 Jul 2021, 21:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/21/21 Posts: 539 Post Likes: +624
Aircraft: B55 Owner
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mike - if u removed the pedestal where did the AP controls end up? The Ulta I flew in had it all down there
Under GPS 1 and 2.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 04 Jul 2021, 00:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21190 Post Likes: +26677 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What is fuel burn at Fl410 and 425kts? Depends on weight and temps. We were about ISA and 12,500 lbs, 104% N1, 1087 pph (162 GPH) total per manual, 410 KTAS. We were definitely doing more speed than that, though. We were fairly light. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 04 Jul 2021, 00:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21190 Post Likes: +26677 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mike - if u removed the pedestal where did the AP controls end up? The Ulta I flew in had it all down there Under GPS 1 and 2. Yes, correct. No avionics aft of the throttles.
GCU 485 above pilot PFD. This was not the first proposed layout (FD mode above PFD, GCU 485 in center panel), but I had that changed and I'm glad I did. The FD mode is something the copilot may want to change, and they can do everything the GCU 485 can do on their PFD.
You play with the AP pitch wheel quite a bit, so having that in a short pedestal may be preferred for some. I've found it works pretty well as done. I could be convinced it would be better to swap FD mode and AP panel left/right, or not.
There are a lot of little things to get right with these panel retrofits.
Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|