banner
banner

30 Jan 2026, 18:16 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 2355 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 ... 157  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 02 Jul 2021, 21:38 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21190
Post Likes: +26677
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Mike C - what’s been impression of Citation vs Mu2 after 35 hours of ops….

The MU2 is more reliable and burns a lot less fuel.

Still in the early stages of getting the V properly debugged, so it isn't quite fair to compare a plane I've had for 13 years with one I just got. My last achievement was getting the Freon AC fixed last weekend. Still got a fair list of minor things to work on. Getting things all setup with fixing things, maintenance, paperwork, etc, has been a lot of work.

The V is pretty easy to fly. I'm right in the zone where I think I know how to fly it, but probably don't. I am starting to fly it single pilot, the SIC mentor is now doing nothing. That's quite a shift to get used to and a lot of work for me now, which will abate when I get more used to things.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 02:10 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1810
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August. Took the commercial written this morning. Check ride coming up. Then SPE for the V. Beast of an airplane. Feels much bigger than the 501sp. These legacy Citations are being recognized for the exceptional value they offer. I think they are solid hedge against inflation too. Thanks to Chip for all the amazing work. He’s the best.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 04:40 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/15/21
Posts: 3244
Post Likes: +1704
Username Protected wrote:
How much simpler this would be if there was a CE-500S type rating, allows flying CE-500 single pilot (all of them).

No stupid SPE, no confusion on who can fly or not fly 501/551, simple.

Mike C.[/quote

You did so much for the MU2 fuel controller issue .You obviously know how to deal with FAA . Why don’t you make this your pet project .

To really make this work, I think you'd need Cessna's support and backing. They have experience getting the Single Pilot Exemption approved, after all.

The question is whether Cessna would be interested. I could see a business case for and against.

I also could see some resistance on safety grounds to a general 500 series SP rating for the bigger planes like the 560. How much training and prior experience should be required to fly a 560 with the proposed 500 SP rating? It's bound to be more than for a 501. So if they approve an all-encompassing SP rating for the 500 series, that might actually increase the requirements to fly a 501 above what they are now.

And I don't think the CJ4/CJ analogy will work here.
_________________
Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 11:56 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21190
Post Likes: +26677
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August.

I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that.

Before:
Attachment:
560-0149-old-panel.png

After:
Attachment:
n61gk-panel-1.png

Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue.

The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now.

I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves.

We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane.

Mike C.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 12:08 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21190
Post Likes: +26677
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
To really make this work, I think you'd need Cessna's support and backing. They have experience getting the Single Pilot Exemption approved, after all.

Cessna no longer maintains an active SPE. The original one, 4050, is from 1984. Textron's last SPE timed out in 2012.

It should be noted that Textron owns Flightsafety and they maintain an SPE.

Quote:
The question is whether Cessna would be interested.

Don't need Textron involved to do this.

Textron can't be against it since that would alienate customers, so they will be at least quiet if not actively support it.

Quote:
I also could see some resistance on safety grounds to a general 500 series SP rating for the bigger planes like the 560.

The SPE applies to 500 and 560 alike, no difference, so this wouldn't be any different.

Quote:
How much training and prior experience should be required to fly a 560 with the proposed 500 SP rating?

Same as the 500, 550, S550.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 14:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2101
Post Likes: +2216
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August.

I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that.

Before:
Attachment:
560-0149-old-panel.png

After:
Attachment:
n61gk-panel-1.png

Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue.

The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now.

I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves.

We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane.

Mike C.


What is fuel burn at Fl410 and 425kts?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 15:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5346
Post Likes: +5405
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
600lbs a side usually


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 15:33 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/15/21
Posts: 3244
Post Likes: +1704
Username Protected wrote:
Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August.

I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that.

Before:
Attachment:
560-0149-old-panel.png

After:
Attachment:
n61gk-panel-1.png

Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue.

The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now.

I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves.

We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane.

Mike C.

That looks great, Mike! I don't even want to think about how much it cost... :sad:

I see the backup attitude indicator. Air-driven co-pilots AI is gone. Is there a third independent attitude source?
_________________
Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 15:49 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/17/21
Posts: 92
Post Likes: +42
Aircraft: C550
James Crossno ,
I’m flying Jet Techs 550 demo & STC plane for the GTN 750 & TXI 700. No problems great installation .


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 16:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/09
Posts: 4813
Post Likes: +2520
Company: retired corporate mostly
Location: Chico,California KCIC/CL56
Aircraft: 1956 Champion 7EC
Quote:
The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs.


Impressive!

_________________
Jeff

soloed in a land of Superhomers/1959 Cessna 150, retired with Proline 21/ CJ4.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 21:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2101
Post Likes: +2216
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
Close on my V Tuesday. It goes in for full Jet Tech panel in August.

I've just been through all this process if you want any advice. A major question is the G600 STC timing and what you want to do about that.

Before:
Attachment:
560-0149-old-panel.png

After:
Attachment:
n61gk-panel-1.png

Getting rid of the pedestal made a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort. I was worried it wouldn't be as good as my MU2 due to pedestal and floor control column. Turns out, not a problem with the pedestal removed and the column hasn't been an issue.

The shop took out 500 lbs of stuff and put back 120 lbs for a net weight savings of 380 lbs. The end result is not quite that good due to needing some nose ballast, but it helps. The plane is almost as light as an S550 now.

I've been to mach 0.75 and 425 KTAS in cruise at FL410. It really moves.

We should form the Garminized legacy Citation support group. It really revitalizes the plane.

Mike C.


Mike - if u removed the pedestal where did the AP controls end up? The Ulta I flew in had it all down there

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 21:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/21/21
Posts: 539
Post Likes: +624
Aircraft: B55 Owner
Username Protected wrote:

Mike - if u removed the pedestal where did the AP controls end up? The Ulta I flew in had it all down there


Under GPS 1 and 2.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 03 Jul 2021, 22:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1806
Post Likes: +1713
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Now every thread will eventually be about the Ultra. In the past every thread ended up about the MU2. LOL.


Just teasing Mike C. Haha

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 04 Jul 2021, 00:50 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21190
Post Likes: +26677
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
What is fuel burn at Fl410 and 425kts?

Depends on weight and temps.

We were about ISA and 12,500 lbs, 104% N1, 1087 pph (162 GPH) total per manual, 410 KTAS. We were definitely doing more speed than that, though. We were fairly light.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 04 Jul 2021, 00:54 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21190
Post Likes: +26677
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Mike - if u removed the pedestal where did the AP controls end up? The Ulta I flew in had it all down there
Under GPS 1 and 2.

Yes, correct. No avionics aft of the throttles.

GCU 485 above pilot PFD. This was not the first proposed layout (FD mode above PFD, GCU 485 in center panel), but I had that changed and I'm glad I did. The FD mode is something the copilot may want to change, and they can do everything the GCU 485 can do on their PFD.

You play with the AP pitch wheel quite a bit, so having that in a short pedestal may be preferred for some. I've found it works pretty well as done. I could be convinced it would be better to swap FD mode and AP panel left/right, or not.

There are a lot of little things to get right with these panel retrofits.

Mike C.
_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 2355 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 ... 157  Next



Electroair (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.Plane AC Tile.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.