10 Dec 2025, 10:04 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 02:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/25/12 Posts: 3928 Post Likes: +4186 Location: KRHV San Jose, CA
Aircraft: A36, R44, C525
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The entire Jet type rating is a mess. I can get a type rating in 4-5 days with AZ type rating and they want $12.5k and I have to use my own plane. My initial in my 421 was $4k and 3 days with a Sim. Why in the hell would a Jet initial cost 3 times in my plane?
This is compete horse crap. Just charging people crazy amounts because they can. No way the cost is relative to what you are getting.
Welcome to the Jet world. LOL.
Mike Just go to Loft. 10 days and you have your 500s with the FAA 25 hour mentor deal. At 25 hours call FSDO and they hand you 500 single pilot. That’s it....it simple. The 25 hours with a pro is the best money spent in your new JET... as my guy said many times. Rocky you are flying a jet.
_________________ Rocky Hill
Altitude is Everything.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 03:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/15/15 Posts: 70 Post Likes: +37 Location: EDDS
Aircraft: C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I didn’t say the 421 requires a type rating but other than the DPE check ride it is a very similar process and time required. 4 days with a instructor is the same cost regardless of what piece of paper you get. No reason a all mighty type rating should cost 3X a 421 initial. I had to do the same ground and 15 hours of sim for the 421.
Mike My C510 type rating at FlightSafety International was way more educative, intense, professional, demanding and rewarding than any of my experiences in my aviation life so far. I don‘t think you can compare any C421 training to a type rating at a professional provider. Getting your first jet type rating, I would choose the most professional training you can get and would always include a very good sim. You just can’t do all the failures, abnormals, emergencies, bad weather and upset recovery in the aircraft. AFAIK, FlightSafety is offering a C501 course at Atlanta. I would not try to save neither money nor time for this big step. My C510 SP type rating was 18 days and it was even too condensed for some. Skip some items and you might regret when trying to figure out what the hell is going on in real life one day. Those are fast and complex machines. Operating a jet single pilot, the component most likely to fail is right beneath the headset.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 10:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3148 Post Likes: +1662
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Rocky
Loft told me I will have to get another check ride. Can’t just call. I think that’s with the 525 type rating. The 500 is different.
I don’t see any reason to do 10 day when I can do 4 day and get more time in my plane. I will have to do 25 hours before I can solo anyway.
Mike I don't see why the 500 rating should be different than the 525S. You should be able to get the type rating in the sim, do the 25 hours SOE and get to fly SP without another checkride.
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 10:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 2304 Post Likes: +1203 Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't see why the 500 rating should be different than the 525S.
Well for starters, all aircraft covered by the CE525 type rating were certified as single pilot airplanes; not the case with all aircraft covered by the CE500 type rating. The CE500 type rating covers the CE500, CE501, CE550, CE551, and CE560. Only the CE501 and CE551 were certified as single pilot. The CE525 type rating covers the CE525, CE525A, CE525B and CE525C, all of which were certified as single pilot. So for the CE525 you can get a PIC type rating that is either a CE525(S) type rating (single pilot), or a CE525 type rating (which requires an SIC). For the CE500, IF you take the ride in a CE501 or CE551, AND you take it as single pilot, your CE500 type rating will permit you to fly the CE501 (or CE551) single pilot (in whichever airplane you took the ride, not both, and your logbook will so note), and act as PIC in a CE500, CE550, or CE560 with an SIC. OR if you meet certain requirements you can get a letter of exemption that will permit you to fly the CE500, CE550, and CE560 single pilot also. This is independent of what your insurance company will require (mentor time), and it is further complicated if it is your first type rating and you did it in a sim (which will come with PIC restrictions, i.e. an IOE (if part 121) / SOE (if part 91) requirement). It may be complicated, but it's not THAT complicated. It's been explained numerous times accurately in this (and other) thread(s). And sometimes explained inaccurately, lol.
_________________ Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 11:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3148 Post Likes: +1662
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't see why the 500 rating should be different than the 525S.
Well for starters, all aircraft covered by the CE525 type rating were certified as single pilot airplanes; not the case with all aircraft covered by the CE500 type rating. The CE500 type rating covers the CE500, CE501, CE550, CE551, and CE560. Only the CE501 and CE551 were certified as single pilot. The CE525 type rating covers the CE525, CE525A, CE525B and CE525C, all of which were certified as single pilot. So for the CE525 you can get a PIC type rating that is either a CE525(S) type rating (single pilot), or a CE525 type rating (which requires an SIC). For the CE500, IF you take the ride in a CE501 or CE551, AND you take it as single pilot, your CE500 type rating will permit you to fly the CE501 (or CE551) single pilot (in whichever airplane you took the ride, not both, and your logbook will so note), and act as PIC in a CE500, CE550, or CE560 with an SIC. OR if you meet certain requirements you can get a letter of exemption that will permit you to fly the CE500, CE550, and CE560 single pilot also. This is independent of what your insurance company will require (mentor time), and it is further complicated if it is your first type rating and you did it in a sim (which will come with PIC restrictions, i.e. an IOE (if part 121) / SOE (if part 91) requirement). It may be complicated, but it's not THAT complicated. It's been explained numerous times accurately in this (and other) thread(s). And sometimes explained inaccurately, lol. Let's say I want to do the checkride in a sim specifically so I get a rating for the 501 (I know I still have to do the 25 hours SOE afterwards). Are any sims available for the 501, or is the problem that they are set up as 550's or 560's, so you get a restricted 500 rating and then later have to take another checkride in an actual 501?
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 13:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/17/21 Posts: 92 Post Likes: +42
Aircraft: C550
|
|
|
[quote="Mike Ciholas"]How much simpler this would be if there was a CE-500S type rating, allows flying CE-500 single pilot (all of them).
No stupid SPE, no confusion on who can fly or not fly 501/551, simple.
Mike C.[/quote
You did so much for the MU2 fuel controller issue .You obviously know how to deal with FAA . Why don’t you make this your pet project .
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 13:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1721 Post Likes: +1776 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For the CE500, IF you take the ride in a CE501 or CE551, AND you take it as single pilot, your CE500 type rating will permit you to fly the CE501 (or CE551) single pilot (in whichever airplane you took the ride, not both, and your logbook will so note), and act as PIC in a CE500, CE550, or CE560 with an SIC. Except this is NOT what has happened to a few BT members in this thread. They took the check ride in an SP aircraft and did the check ride SP, yet they were given the SIC required limitation on their type rating. This is wrong and goes against the regs as I have read them (and against what you wrote above). This is why everyone is spun up and why there is "confusion". It seems like DPEs are not following the rules and placing limitations on people's ratings based on their own feelings.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 14:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3148 Post Likes: +1662
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For the CE500, IF you take the ride in a CE501 or CE551, AND you take it as single pilot, your CE500 type rating will permit you to fly the CE501 (or CE551) single pilot (in whichever airplane you took the ride, not both, and your logbook will so note), and act as PIC in a CE500, CE550, or CE560 with an SIC. Except this is NOT what has happened to a few BT members in this thread. They took the check ride in an SP aircraft and did the check ride SP, yet they were given the SIC required limitation on their type rating. This is wrong and goes against the regs as I have read them (and against what you wrote above). This is why everyone is spun up and why there is "confusion". It seems like DPEs are not following the rules and placing limitations on people's ratings based on their own feelings. Since DPE's are acting on behalf of the government, they cannot act in an arbitrary and capricious manner when applying a regulation.
However, it is not clear to me that the way the regulation is written it unequivocally requires the DPE to issue an unrestricted CE500 type rating if you take the checkride in a 501. The regulation says if you don't meet certain requirements you cannot get an unrestricted rating if you take the checkride in a sim. It does not say that you must be issued an unrestricted rating if you take the checkride in an airplane.
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 16:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 2304 Post Likes: +1203 Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: However, it is not clear to me that the way the regulation is written it unequivocally requires the DPE to issue an unrestricted CE500 type rating if you take the checkride in a 501. Correct, they can fail you. But they don't then issue you a consolation prize.
_________________ Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 16:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3148 Post Likes: +1662
|
|
Username Protected wrote: However, it is not clear to me that the way the regulation is written it unequivocally requires the DPE to issue an unrestricted CE500 type rating if you take the checkride in a 501. Correct, they can fail you. But they don't then issue you a consolation prize. I thought the "SIC Required" was the consolation prize?
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 02 Jul 2021, 16:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 2304 Post Likes: +1203 Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Correct, they can fail you. But they don't then issue you a consolation prize. I thought the "SIC Required" was the consolation prize? Don't think so. I'm very skeptical of any examples of people implying someone took a check ride for one rating and was issued another.
How many CE-500 type ratings with an "SIC Required" limitation have people seen? Has anyone seen a B-737 type rating with an "SIC Required" limitation? No, because it is understood an SIC is required.
The CE-525 is different because it is a single-pilot airplane. If you take a CE-525 type rating check ride as "Crew" (and you pass the check ride), you will be issued a CE-525 type rating with an "SIC Required" limitation.
If you take a CE-525 type rating check ride as "Crew" and do a great job and impress the hell out of the examiner, he is NOT going to issue you a CE-525(S) type rating.
Conversely, if you take a CE-525 type rating check ride as "Single Pilot", and don't do so well, the examiner is NOT going to issue you a CE-525 type rating with an "SIC Required" limitation. No consolation prizes. Perhaps some examiners have done it, but I think some part of the story is missing.
_________________ Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|