20 May 2025, 08:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 08 Apr 2021, 23:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/29/12 Posts: 668 Post Likes: +261
|
|
Hi all,
Just wondering about the 182 turbo. Why did cessna stop making them? Are they good performers? Are they complex to upkeep or overhaul? Just want to learn about them.
Rgs,
Patrick
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 03:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5867 Post Likes: +2635 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
The 2000 model T182Ts are nice and the Lycoming engines, in my experience, are much better than the 6 cyl continentals. We have a flight school that I fly out of at KHEF and they had one on line for about 7 years without much problem.
Years ago I got to fly a turbo 182RG and it was pretty nice *but* it was just a flight versus maintaining one or knowing the school that owned it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 08:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/28/17 Posts: 1283 Post Likes: +1367 Location: Panama City, FL
Aircraft: Velocity XL-RG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That'd be turbo diesel then, wouldn’t it Geoffrey? Not necessarily. Just about all the diesel engines I've heard of that run Jet-A are modified to do so. Probably to the point that they won't run on diesel anymore.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 09:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/11/10 Posts: 3833 Post Likes: +4140 Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
|
|
I bought a new T182T in 2008. Nothing wrong with the airplane IMO. Certainly no critical flaw that stopped production. The diesel that never was, as described above, was the cause. Could some things be better? Sure, just like any of them. Cessna reduced the power output to 230, kept the service ceiling low, and limited the useful load, to encourage buyers to move to the 206 which I eventually did. I used mine to fly around in the Rockies so performance was a big deal. If I were buying today.... I would find an S or T 550 conversion and make the panel what I needed it to be. Those options were not possible when I bought the T182T. For example, I would rather have this than a brand new one: https://www.controller.com/listing/for- ... e-aircraft
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 09:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/27/18 Posts: 1650 Post Likes: +1521 Location: South NorthEast West Virginia :)
Aircraft: Club Archer
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That'd be turbo diesel then, wouldn’t it Geoffrey? Not necessarily. Just about all the diesel engines I've heard of that run Jet-A are modified to do so. Probably to the point that they won't run on diesel anymore. I think he meant the Diesel Cycle, not the fuel specifically.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 09:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/06/14 Posts: 7029 Post Likes: +8444 Company: The French Tradition Location: KCRQ - Carlsbad - KTOA
Aircraft: 89 A36 TN, 78 Tiger
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I bought a new T182T in 2008. Nothing wrong with the airplane IMO. Certainly no critical flaw that stopped production. The diesel that never was, as described above, was the cause. Could some things be better? Sure, just like any of them. Cessna reduced the power output to 230, kept the service ceiling low, and limited the useful load, to encourage buyers to move to the 206 which I eventually did. I used mine to fly around in the Rockies so performance was a big deal. If I were buying today.... I would find an S or T 550 conversion and make the panel what I needed it to be. Those options were not possible when I bought the T182T. For example, I would rather have this than a brand new one: https://www.controller.com/listing/for- ... e-aircraftWow... This thing is incredible 315 HP in a 182. I would love to have this. I think that the 182 is one of the best swiss army knife of aviation. Add that kind of power to it, and you increase the range of usefulness a lot more. Specially if you get it outfitted with the large tanks. But for long trips I would love to add wheel pans, which would be tough with those wheels. 
_________________ Bonanza 89 A36 Turbo Norm Grumman Tiger 78
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 12:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/22/12 Posts: 26 Post Likes: +32
Aircraft: Aerostar
|
|
I fly a 1981 T182 one of a very few that was ever made (I was told 32). It is basically a 182RG with fixed gear it actually still has the area under the engine for the nose gear to retract into. We put the Wing-X STOL kit on it last year and removed the factory A/C and Oxy Systems.
Makes one of the best back country load haulers you can find in my opinion while still allowing cross country at high altitude and decent TAS. I have a portable Oxy System that I take on long cross countries and have been up to 16,500 with it a few times.
Funny story about it. When we acquired it the flight manual was in shambles. We called Cessna to get an updated one and the said "We never built that airplane." After talking to a few different people we finally got what we needed but I got a chuckle out of it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 10 Apr 2021, 07:37 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 08/30/10 Posts: 4329 Post Likes: +2369 Location: Kingston, NY (20N)
Aircraft: 1985 Bonanza F33A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That'd be turbo diesel then, wouldn’t it Geoffrey? Yes, I believe it was the Continental turbo diesel, but I honestly don’t remember so I didn’t put specifics since I like to be a factual person. I used JetA to generically describe the engine Textron was working on at the time. It was a compression ignition turbocharged engine. I think they had an off airport landing due to the loss of a turbocharger, or hose, or something and it didn’t have enough power to stay aloft. It was posted here, possibly in the crashtalk channel.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 10 Apr 2021, 09:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/11/10 Posts: 3833 Post Likes: +4140 Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, I believe it was the Continental turbo diesel, but I honestly don’t remember so I didn’t put specifics since I like to be a factual person. I used JetA to generically describe the engine Textron was working on at the time. It was a compression ignition turbocharged engine.
I think they had an off airport landing due to the loss of a turbocharger, or hose, or something and it didn’t have enough power to stay aloft. It was posted here, possibly in the crashtalk channel. I talked to a Cessna rep in detail about this incident (take that with a grain of salt). Aside from the off airport landing the design issue that couldn't be overcome was the difficulty of restarting, especially at altitude, so not just a one time mechanical failure.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: cessna 182 turbo Posted: 10 Apr 2021, 13:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/21/18 Posts: 720 Post Likes: +1033 Location: Jandakot, Western Australia
Aircraft: C182R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not necessarily. Just about all the diesel engines I've heard of that run Jet-A are modified to do so. Probably to the point that they won't run on diesel anymore. The SMA and Thielert/Austro engines all run on either Jet-A or Diesel, as does the Continental. Is there some significant aero diesel that I'm missing?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|