02 Dec 2025, 03:44 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 23 Jan 2021, 16:48 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14430 Post Likes: +9560 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Convington did my HSI and it cost me 6.5k. Most of the overhauls are in the 250-350k range. Now if you take it to Dallas Airmotive and throw them the keys, things may be different. I asked two shops, Martin and Mather about this... they both laughed and said that’s about the cost to open it up and put it back together... they both said pay now or (someone) pays more later and to expect 30-40k for a proper job. Ours is due next year.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 23 Jan 2021, 17:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7098 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Convington did my HSI and it cost me 6.5k. Most of the overhauls are in the 250-350k range. Now if you take it to Dallas Airmotive and throw them the keys, things may be different. I asked two shops, Martin and Mather about this... they both laughed and said that’s about the cost to open it up and put it back together... they both said pay now or (someone) pays more later and to expect 30-40k for a proper job. Ours is due next year.
Tell em I'll bet them each 50k and I'll email and post the invoice here if they pay up. I went to Covington in Tunica MS, that's where the ag boys go. I flew my airplane to Covington and did on airplane.
If it costs them that much to open and close it, they're raping you.
Also, chat with Brent and he will mirror my sentiments. My HSI was first run.
Just emailed it to you. Now post up!!!
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 23 Jan 2021, 18:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7098 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yeah doesn’t look like anything was replaced on your invoice. I’ll ask them, but they both said there is a bunch of stuff to replace. I’m just the messenger, would like to pass good info to my client.  Correct, if nothing is needing replacement, don't replace them. Also, if you can grind them to within tolerances, do that too. AG folks like Craig C never spend what retail pt6 owners spend. They just do it so many times that they know the cost. You will note that to take the thing apart and put it back together IS NOT 30k like the shops would like you to believe. As Mike C states, you gotta know where to go.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 23 Jan 2021, 19:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 828 Post Likes: +313 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: M600 is maybe $200 max less per hr than a PC12. This is nuts. At 200 hours per year avionics maintenance alone is over half, $115, of that $200/hr. 20gph more is another $60 per hour. Those two things alone are almost $200. We haven’t even started on phase maintenance, hangar, insurance, parking, that these “much larger planes cost to own”. I’ve heard $1200 hour for PC12 and I can attest about $600 for a Meridian.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 24 Jan 2021, 20:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3713 Post Likes: +5493 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
|
Our second annual on our M600 is quoted at under a thousand dollars this year. We are under piper ultimate, which all new papers are under. Five years of basically free maintenance. Some consumables are not covered like tires and brakes, you do burn up tires, brakes last forever with Beta. We had 95% brakes left at our next annual. We will have a couple of consumables come do as we are over 700 hours now, But it shouldn’t drive the price up that much. There is no new available turbine out there right now can come close to the piper turbines in operating cost. As Joel mentioned, almost everything on a piper is serviced at annual, and on condition. I had to do a gear overhaul on the mains, on one of my prior PA46’s. If I recall it was either 300 or 700. It might be 300 a side and 700 both sides with parts and labor, done at the service center. That is significant downtime and $28,000 in a TBM, When they send them back to Socata for the OH.
As to the comment on fuel burn at 28,000 feet. At ISA+10 which is kind of a normal temperature in the mid US, 36.7 gallons per hour in our plane would typically cruise 265 knots.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 24 Jan 2021, 21:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/20/15 Posts: 668 Post Likes: +369 Location: KFAT
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is there any negative to using beta? Extra wear on the engine, prop, etc? Prop blade erosion sometimes. Also, less air going over an oil cooler, so you may need to keep an eye on oil temps
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 24 Jan 2021, 23:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7098 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: M600 is maybe $200 max less per hr than a PC12. This is nuts. At 200 hours per year avionics maintenance alone is over half, $115, of that $200/hr. 20gph more is another $60 per hour. Those two things alone are almost $200. We haven’t even started on phase maintenance, hangar, insurance, parking, that these “much larger planes cost to own”. I’ve heard $1200 hour for PC12 and I can attest about $600 for a Meridian.
I've heard that M600's outta warranty are depreciating more than 100% per annum and that hrly operating costs are higher than a CJ3!!!!!
HAPP/MAPP covers more than avionics ...
I'm around $700 direct hrly.
Fuel burn for me is around 55 gph including ascent and descent, but I fly long legs. At Fl300, i'm around 325pph....
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 25 Jan 2021, 00:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/02/15 Posts: 4232 Post Likes: +2942 Location: Fresno, CA (KFCH)
Aircraft: T210M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is there any negative to using beta? Extra wear on the engine, prop, etc? There is a carbon “beta block” that wears each time beta is used. Compared to a brake job, it is relatively cheap to replace.
_________________ 1977 Cessna 210, with "elite" turbocharging.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 25 Jan 2021, 01:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/20/15 Posts: 668 Post Likes: +369 Location: KFAT
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is there any negative to using beta? Extra wear on the engine, prop, etc? There is a carbon “beta block” that wears each time beta is used. Compared to a brake job, it is relatively cheap to replace.
We usually replace our beta block every year or so. Ends up being something like $20 in parts and maybe half an hour of labor. Peanuts compared to the 4 figure brake job
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 25 Jan 2021, 12:58 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5843 Post Likes: +7295 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Convington did my HSI and it cost me 6.5k. Most of the overhauls are in the 250-350k range. Now if you take it to Dallas Airmotive and throw them the keys, things may be different. I asked two shops, Martin and Mather about this... they both laughed and said that’s about the cost to open it up and put it back together... they both said pay now or (someone) pays more later and to expect 30-40k for a proper job. Ours is due next year. I bet it was a nervous laugh... I would tell you the exact same thing if someone like Covington disrupted the old guard way of charging for my services. There are a lot of Martin and Mather's out there, and unfortunately there are not enough Covington's.
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 25 Jan 2021, 14:42 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14430 Post Likes: +9560 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I bet it was a nervous laugh... I would tell you the exact same thing if someone like Covington disrupted the old guard way of charging for my services. There are a lot of Martin and Mather's out there, and unfortunately there are not enough Covington's. These shops don't do the HSI, they send to Pratt or Dallas. Clearly there is a difference here other than markup. Nothing was done on Pennman's invoice other than the inspection.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|