banner
banner

22 Jun 2025, 17:20 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 19  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 15:37 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/20/15
Posts: 654
Post Likes: +362
Location: KFAT
Username Protected wrote:
1200hp requires roughly 2x the fuel that 600hp does. So fuel costs are roughly double.


Don't forget how each application is flat rated (thermodynamic vs shaft horsepower).

An M600 at 28,000' will probably burn 40ish gph still making most of its power. A -67 (or -66) variant will burn ~60 gph making 700-800 hp in the same setting. Not quite 2x.


Some other data points to the big block PT6 cost comments: There are also stories of big blocks with painless (30k) hot sections and first run overhauls in the ~$350k range (at a name brand shop). Not all end up being nightmares.

With the amount of Pilatus' out there, I wish Pratt had the the -67 variants on a flat rate OH structure like the -42s and others.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 15:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 821
Post Likes: +312
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
Are the -42A's on a flat rate OH program? I only know of them in the Meridian. Most of the -42's are on King Air's.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 18:14 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12811
Post Likes: +5258
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Regarding piddle packs - they sell them at every 7-11. Gallon zip loc bag, insert diaper. Rip lining out of diaper if you're feeling industrious.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 19:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7095
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
The PT6A-6x engines can cost $500K to overhaul.


Mike, yes and no. Depends once again where you get the work done. Just like the engines on the Mitts, their are great places for overhaul and great places for getting shafted.

Convington did my HSI and it cost me 6.5k. Most of the overhauls are in the 250-350k range. Now if you take it to Dallas Airmotive and throw them the keys, things may be different.

PC12's relative to other currently produced aircraft are a very good buy. They do a lot of things very, very well. Can they run as cheap as an M600, I'm not sure, but you sure as hell are not carrying 4 surfboards and 10 people in an M600 1700NM with a fully enclosed lav.......

with a push to talk I may add :D

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 19:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 821
Post Likes: +312
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
Username Protected wrote:
The PT6A-6x engines can cost $500K to overhaul.


Mike, yes and no. Depends once again where you get the work done. Just like the engines on the Mitts, their are great places for overhaul and great places for getting shafted.

Convington did my HSI and it cost me 6.5k. Most of the overhauls are in the 250-350k range. Now if you take it to Dallas Airmotive and throw them the keys, things may be different.

PC12's relative to other currently produced aircraft are a very good buy. They do a lot of things very, very well. Can they run as cheap as an M600, I'm not sure, but you sure as hell are not carrying 4 surfboards and 10 people in an M600 1700NM with a fully enclosed lav.......

with a push to talk I may add :D

They can’t run anywhere near as cheap as an M600, as you know. 1/3 more fuel for the same speed, almost twice as much to acquire, not maintained by Part 91 standards. Your avionics warranty plan alone costs more than an annual inspection on the M600. So it better do something a lot better. 4 surfboards and passengers 1700 miles is a good example of that. But nobody buys an M600 with the expectation of doing that either.

Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 20:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2018
Post Likes: +2068
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:

PC12's relative to other currently produced aircraft are a very good buy. They do a lot of things very, very well. Can they run as cheap as an M600, I'm not sure, but you sure as hell are not carrying 4 surfboards and 10 people in an M600 1700NM with a fully enclosed lav


Alright Penman, you have to post a picture of 10 humans in a pc12 with 4 surfboards. You either surf much shorter boards than me or you have some racks on the wings ;-)

Slight thread drift, but despite the piaggio speed, it is not a great plane for hauling gear. Mountain bikes and skis are much much easier to cram in the back of a PC12. When I am old and have nothing to do but fly (which means I won't mind going slow:-), I will get a PC12 to cart my bikes and boards around in ;-0.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 21:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 2036
Post Likes: +1472
Company: Capitalist
Location: CYKF Kitchener, Ontario
Aircraft: Mooney M20K 231+
Username Protected wrote:
The PT6A-6x engines can cost $500K to overhaul.




PC12's relative to other currently produced aircraft are a very good buy. They do a lot of things very, very well. Can they run as cheap as an M600, I'm not sure, but you sure as hell are not carrying 4 surfboards and 10 people in an M600 1700NM with a fully enclosed lav.......

with a push to talk I may add :D


You have a push to talk in your fully enclosed lav? don't think I want to see that

Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 22:03 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/16/09
Posts: 7224
Post Likes: +2100
Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: BE-TBD
Username Protected wrote:
You have a push to talk in your fully enclosed lav? don't think I want to see that


It’s an old Crandall era joke.

PC12 guys always like to tell you how much better their airplane is...until the Avanti enters the conversation :D . The Avanti is the top of the heap for turboprops if you can wrap your head around two engines.

The Garrett guys beat the efficiency drum until nothing else can be heard. It’s a hypnotic, soothing and drowning sound. If you worship at that alter you’re going to stay there.

There’s no definite or one-size-fits all answer to this sort of question. It’s also why airplanes of all types and manners exist in the market. While the turboprop is a refreshingly predictable beast, bad news comes in a wide variety of clothing and breaks all the best laid spreadsheets when she comes through the door and throws a fit of rage.

_________________
AI generated post. Any misrepresentation, inaccuracies or omissions not attributable to member.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 22:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 2036
Post Likes: +1472
Company: Capitalist
Location: CYKF Kitchener, Ontario
Aircraft: Mooney M20K 231+
Ah ha,, Thanks Tyler, I get it now,, I'd forgotten all about the Crandell influence


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 22 Jan 2021, 23:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7095
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:

PC12's relative to other currently produced aircraft are a very good buy. They do a lot of things very, very well. Can they run as cheap as an M600, I'm not sure, but you sure as hell are not carrying 4 surfboards and 10 people in an M600 1700NM with a fully enclosed lav


Alright Penman, you have to post a picture of 10 humans in a pc12 with 4 surfboards. You either surf much shorter boards than me or you have some racks on the wings ;-)



Did it once. Way too f'n cramped in the back.....mostly kids and yup, 4 boards, plus a pump up paddle board. I ride a 6'4" egg(Bing or Savage), kids ride either pintail or a fish.........right now we're into foiling which is crazy. Kai Lenny and Chris Bertish have turned the boys into foiling fools.

M600 is maybe $200 max less per hr than a PC12.

.......and yes, I missed the P180 boat big time........Tony and Adam laugh at me daily.....at least I get Adam's wine on discount!!!!

As for JC, I talk with him often.........he sold his PC12 and is currently in a Cj4.......and he's moved to my home state.......bumming my hangar space to boot......
_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 23 Jan 2021, 00:30 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5959
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:

As for JC, I talk with him often.........he sold his PC12 and is currently in a Cj4.......and he's moved to my home state.......bumming my hangar space to boot......


Despite not agreeing on absolutely anything with Jason, do congratulate him on his upgrade from me! :thumbup:

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 23 Jan 2021, 00:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7095
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
Despite not agreeing on absolutely anything with Jason, do congratulate him on his upgrade from me! :thumbup:


He's can be a schmuck online in forums......in real life, great dude.....why this is....beats me.......he's flying fast and high at the moment.

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 23 Jan 2021, 01:30 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20371
Post Likes: +25556
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
he's flying fast and high at the moment.

Most of his recent posts on CJP are about how to service the lav in his CJ4.

Ah, the luxurious life of a jet owner.

CJP = Citation Jet Pilots, a for pay forum for Citation owners.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 23 Jan 2021, 01:39 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5959
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:
he's flying fast and high at the moment.

Most of his recent posts on CJP are about how to service the lav in his CJ4.

Ah, the luxurious life of a jet owner.

CJP = Citation Jet Pilots, a for pay forum for Citation owners.

Mike C.


I'd almost pay the join fee just to argue with him! ;)
_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 23 Jan 2021, 09:09 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12811
Post Likes: +5258
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Username Protected wrote:
he's flying fast and high at the moment.

Most of his recent posts on CJP are about how to service the lav in his CJ4.

Ah, the luxurious life of a jet owner.
C.


The obvious answer is with your checkbook. I give him props for engagement!

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 19  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.rnp.85x50.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.