08 May 2025, 15:24 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 20 Jun 2020, 12:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2336 Post Likes: +2510 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can any of you guys with CJ experience please comment if these are high by Williams standards? Aren't these 104 N1 engines too? This picture was taken at 380. Yeah - that's toasty - pretty close to the ITT temp limits for continuous operations especially on the right side. Where did you get the N1 setting from? 102.8 N1 seems quite high. Furthermore, I normally fly by the ITT's anyway and keep them no higher than 750 - I like to take care of my engines even if they're on TAP. At that altitude (don't know what the ISA was), the N1 setting should be somewhere between 99-100. Did you look over the AFM? BTW, need to check your standby alt setting... can't perform your RVSM checks like that.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 20 Jun 2020, 16:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2336 Post Likes: +2510 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks Alex. This was from a friend who flew the plane. What’s the max fan speed at FL380 and -42? He needs an N1 computer. I’d have to go look to calculate it manually. I am spoiled because I have the G1000 which calculates it automatically but I know it’s not 102.8 with those conditions. He was probably ISA +12. He is going to burn those engines. In absence of an N1 computer, tell him to keep the ITT below 750.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 20 Jun 2020, 17:50 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5164 Post Likes: +5124
Aircraft: C501, R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The TAS differ between the GTNs by 8kts? Seems strange. Second garmin got sent out. It didn’t work
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 20 Jun 2020, 18:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 9630 Post Likes: +4474 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The TAS differ between the GTNs by 8kts? Seems strange. Second garmin got sent out. It didn’t work
The TAS comes from the sensors. I hope it didn't get sent out for that alone
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 21 Jun 2020, 04:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 922 Post Likes: +466 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can any of you guys with CJ experience please comment if these are high by Williams standards? Aren't these 104 N1 engines too? This picture was taken at 380. With RAT-42 at FL380 we are talking ISA. The recommended N1 is 101. As Alex notes most of the recommended settings will yield a TIT of 750. You are correct the max N1 is 104.4, but that number is not recommended in any of the data from Cessna. The numbers is that picture is all within limits so Williams I would imagine would not be concerned. Those numbers are high compared to my CJ and the others that aI fly. The N2 is higher for #2 as well by .6. Descent split. I’d say motor 2 is a little worn. Do you have the hours on the motors? Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 21 Jun 2020, 07:10 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5164 Post Likes: +5124
Aircraft: C501, R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can any of you guys with CJ experience please comment if these are high by Williams standards? Aren't these 104 N1 engines too? This picture was taken at 380. With RAT-42 at FL380 we are talking ISA. The recommended N1 is 101. As Alex notes most of the recommended settings will yield a TIT of 750. You are correct the max N1 is 104.4, but that number is not recommended in any of the data from Cessna. The numbers is that picture is all within limits so Williams I would imagine would not be concerned. Those numbers are high compared to my CJ and the others that aI fly. The N2 is higher for #2 as well by .6. Descent split. I’d say motor 2 is a little worn. Do you have the hours on the motors? Andrew
Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 21 Jun 2020, 18:49 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2336 Post Likes: +2510 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK. Why wouldn’t you have confidence on Engine 2 if the borescope came back ok? 3300 hours is fairly low time on a turbine. Just tell your friend not to burn up the engine by flying it right up to the limits. I don’t see why you wouldn't be able to run it on FLEX another 750 hours. Williams is a racket anyway - by pencil whipping a change from Elite to Blue (i.e. more money on Williams’ pocket) you go from 3500 hours to 5000 hours per their program. No technical justification - just BS paperwork. These are not pistons. BTW - I’m a bit surprised your friend is asking these fairly basic questions. Where was he typed? Is he a 525 newbie? He may consider joining CJP.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 21 Jun 2020, 21:21 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5164 Post Likes: +5124
Aircraft: C501, R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK. Why wouldn’t you have confidence on Engine 2 if the borescope came back ok? 3300 hours is fairly low time on a turbine. Just tell your friend not to burn up the engine by flying it right up to the limits. I don’t see why you wouldn't be able to run it on FLEX another 750 hours. Williams is a racket anyway - by pencil whipping a change from Elite to Blue (i.e. more money on Williams’ pocket) you go from 3500 hours to 5000 hours per their program. No technical justification - just BS paperwork. These are not pistons. BTW - I’m a bit surprised your friend is asking these fairly basic questions. Where was he typed? Is he a 525 newbie? He may consider joining CJP.
I don't think Mark Huffstutler is a 525 newbie. He was the one flying the airplane. I'm looking at buying it. Maybe he was just trying to make a point and test the engines. He approved them for FLEX after his boroscope and flight. I wasn't in the airplane otherwise I would have taken some videos. My Premier 1A friend was in the right seat.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs? Posted: 22 Jun 2020, 03:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 922 Post Likes: +466 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK. Im not over concerned at the high ITTs. I think there is a fair margin of them. A mate in a CJ2 had issues but it manifested in abnormally high ITTs on takeoff. Any idea how they performed on TO? Williams seems to be pretty bulletproof.... Which is lucky as they are the jet Mafia. Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|