banner
banner

10 May 2025, 13:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2019, 12:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/11/13
Posts: 948
Post Likes: +827
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Aircraft: Malibu,Husky,TBM7C2
I have a 2003 TBM700C2 and I am on my third annual.

The first year I replaced an air conditioner for 28K. The rest of the annual was about 5k plus 5k labor. About 200 hours flown

Second year was about 15K total. During the year I also replaced a circuit board for 5K. 250 hours flown that year

Third year had to replace 1 gear actuator and Shadin. About 20K total including labor for annual. 150 hours flown.

That plus now 12K insurance (up from 10) and the usual other expenses... hangar, fuel, fees, avionics.

I think annual costs can depend on the shop and what kind of condition the plane was in when you buy.

I do think my shop's rates are less than what I hear in other parts of the country. It also happens to be at my home airport so that helps belay some additional travel costs.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2019, 12:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/06/13
Posts: 421
Post Likes: +260
Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
I think I have asked this question before, but here it goes again:

For the TBM operators: would you operate it out of a caliche runway?

For those who don't know what caliche is: it is a hard surface, compacted material runway with loose rocks and dust. Caliche is calcium carbonate (same as limestone) in a looser form. It is used as a road base material or often for drilling pads.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2019, 12:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/11/13
Posts: 948
Post Likes: +827
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Aircraft: Malibu,Husky,TBM7C2
I would not.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2019, 12:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6198
Post Likes: +4230
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
Doubt I would use a caliche Rwy but yes you could. Best situation would be if you can start on pavement and do your checks there then taxi never stopping during taxi or on Rwy. Ie constant movement forward so that you do not create a vortex and suck something up into the air inlet. Fod.

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2019, 19:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 2320
Post Likes: +720
Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
On my second TBM......first was a 700C2. Moved up to a TBM G850.
Hard to beat for my missions. Looked at mustangs, Phenom 100.......loved em both but range was an issue, type rating, turboprop better on contaminated runways. Depends on what u need.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2019, 10:16 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8669
Post Likes: +9159
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
I think I have asked this question before, but here it goes again:

For the TBM operators: would you operate it out of a caliche runway?

For those who don't know what caliche is: it is a hard surface, compacted material runway with loose rocks and dust. Caliche is calcium carbonate (same as limestone) in a looser form. It is used as a road base material or often for drilling pads.


No.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 07 Sep 2019, 00:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/22/14
Posts: 110
Post Likes: +67
Location: KMYF/ Kamiah, ID
Aircraft: C525, AC90
The September issue of Twin & Turbine has a nice write-up comparing the TBM700C2 to the Meridian. The author Joe Casey is a big PA46T fan (especially jetprops) but does a good job getting to the point.....how important is a fuel stop to you to make your mission.
The TBM rates better in just about every metric except DOC.
Making a fuel stop in dicey weather, as well as all the other possible downsides of a fuel stop, including another quick-turn turbine cycle can make a difference.

The Meridian is efficient, but I have been put off by all the compromises of the early models. Slower with v.g. on the wings, -34c outside temp limit, limited useful, lots of issues with flat tires, “always on” inertial separator, etc.

I don’t see much discussion about pulling the power back on TBM’S but at 245kts. fuel flow is down to 37gph—basically Meridian territory if you want to go there.
https://www.newavex.com/tbm-learning-ce ... re-models/

One other point: the Meridian with full fuel is out of forward c.g. with more than about 200lbs in the front.
https://www.newavex.com/tbm-learning-ce ... d-balance/

_________________
MEL, Comm. Instr. C525(S) type


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 07 Sep 2019, 09:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/11/13
Posts: 948
Post Likes: +827
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Aircraft: Malibu,Husky,TBM7C2
How do the new Meridians do with icing?

I found the piston versions (jet prop airframe) lost 20 kts with light rime. You might get a big surprise if you have AP on, the tail ices (which happens faster than the wings) and suddenly the AP disconnects. You should turn off AP in any icing per the POH. My experience was that you should exit icing conditions ASAP.

A light rime encounter in the TBM is a non-event. Even moderate rime is manageable if you are not staying in it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 07 Sep 2019, 09:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3359
Post Likes: +4825
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
The FIKI on the Meridian was certified after Roselawn when more was known about SLD. It was certified to higher FIKI standards than the legacy PA46's, and even the TBM. The boots are huge compartively. Does well in icing. Since the inertial sep is always on, there is no engine penalty in IMC or ice other than airframe accretion, so you don't see a speed or climb penalty in IMC or icing. The Meridian will handily out climb the early TBMs in IMC/ice due to the IS issues. I think the later TBM's do better. Living in the Rockies, I have more icing experience, than anyone should ever have to endure. Respect ice, always have a plan B and C, but using your brain, and following the POH, the Meridian is very capable in icing conditions.

Here is a picture of the boots on a TBM and Meridian. I have pretty big hands, can palm a basketball ;)

I can touch the top and bottom edge of a TBM boot simultaneously, can't even come close in the Meridian.

TBM

Attachment:
1 (155).jpg


Meridian

Attachment:
1 (154).jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 08 Sep 2019, 15:02 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/17/14
Posts: 5856
Post Likes: +2629
Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
Now you are just showing off for SWMBO.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 08 Sep 2019, 21:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6060
Post Likes: +709
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
The TBM is very capable in icing condition.
Never got into conditions that I couldn't shed the ice in the 1600 hrs I have been flying TBMs.

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 08 Sep 2019, 21:52 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/05/11
Posts: 9997
Post Likes: +7046
Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation
Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
Username Protected wrote:
The TBM is very capable in icing condition.
Never got into conditions that I couldn't shed the ice in the 1600 hrs I have been flying TBMs.


Wasn't it an attempt to climb out of icing that took out the TBM in NJ a few years back?

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 08 Sep 2019, 22:22 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/07/17
Posts: 6976
Post Likes: +5868
Company: Malco Power Design
Location: KLVJ
Aircraft: 1976 Baron 58
Username Protected wrote:
The TBM is very capable in icing condition.
Never got into conditions that I couldn't shed the ice in the 1600 hrs I have been flying TBMs.


Wasn't it an attempt to climb out of icing that took out the TBM in NJ a few years back?


I think it was the lack of an attempt to climb out. If I recall correctly it was over 20 minutes from his first report of icing to the crash without a request for a change in altitude.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 09 Sep 2019, 08:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/01/08
Posts: 2687
Post Likes: +717
https://www.ntsb.gov/about/employment/_ ... 115&akey=1


Top

 Post subject: Re: Half Curious/Serious CSOTBM Question (Q for the TBM folk
PostPosted: 09 Sep 2019, 09:35 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6060
Post Likes: +709
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
A lot went wrong in this flight.
The main thing he never activated the inertial separator so when he encountered ice he basically trash the engine so it wouldn't climb much and then he stayed in probably moderate to severe icing for too long until he stalled the plane and lost control.



Username Protected wrote:
https://www.ntsb.gov/about/employment/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/brief2.aspx?ev_id=20111220X20005&ntsbno=ERA12FA115&akey=1

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



B-Kool (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.camguard.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.