banner
banner

07 Nov 2025, 01:52 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 18:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/30/18
Posts: 141
Post Likes: +134
Location: 1wa6 summer and KTRM winter.
Aircraft: G35, C150
Embarrassing. All week the Cirrus display was overflowing with people and the Beechcraft area was deserted. I love my Bo but the new one is totally obsolete compared to the competition. 8 Bonanza sales this year vs. almost 400 Cirrus's. Same for Cessna's.

Dan

_________________
Boeing 777 captain
A&P
G35 N4246D
Fall City, WA 1wa6 summer.
KTRM winter.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 18:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20344
Post Likes: +25354
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Textron has a large area there, with a couple King Airs, a couple jets, 172, a Baron, and a Bonanza.

I walked through their area, pausing and looking at each plane; nobody paid any attention to me.....at all. Several Textron people were talking to each other.

It’s sad.

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 18:55 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 10/28/14
Posts: 423
Post Likes: +343
Location: Fargo, ND
Aircraft: N80GA - 1979 E55
The Textron reps were are friendly and accommodating folks, but they can only work with what they are given. Cirrus is selling a lifestyle and an experience. Music, videos, things going on in their tent at all parts of the day. Textron came to Oshkosh, a GA event, with a commuter cabin mock-up of the new unpressurized twin they are building for FedEx in its tent?!? And any Beechcraft swag they had was emblazoned with Textron on it as well. I fear the days of Cessna and Beechcraft branding are limited.

_________________
A.P. 'Quinn' Anderson
N80GA - 1979 E55


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 19:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/30/17
Posts: 1406
Post Likes: +1616
Location: KARR
Aircraft: J3, Twin Commander
Username Protected wrote:
I walked through their area, pausing and looking at each plane; nobody paid any attention to me.....at all. Several Textron people were talking to each other.
It’s sad.


This is the part of Oshkosh that absolutely boggles my mind.

When I go to trade shows I'll often hide my badge and move quickly past most booths so I don't get bombarded by sales people.

You can spend 15 minutes in many of the major manufacturers displays at Oshkosh examining every intricate detail of their airplanes and have no one approach you at all, even when most of the folks "working" the booth aren't engaged with anyone. That's bananas! The one exception is Cirrus.

I've no idea what the investment is to get everything to Oshkosh and pay for the space, but they ought to set aside 2% of it to train their people to approach ANYONE who walks into their space to at least acknowledge their presence.

_________________
What are you optimizing for?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 19:45 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 02/23/08
Posts: 6461
Post Likes: +9874
Company: Schulte Booth, P.C.
Location: Easton, MD (KESN)
Aircraft: 1958 Bonanza 35
FWIW, same thing for me at Hartzel.

I am very interested in a composite prop - Hartzel is developing one for the Bonanza crowd.

I would prefer to buy from Hartzel for a variety of reasons (as opposed to MT).

Went to their booth and was well-dressed (that should not matter).

Made an inquiry; the gent said so and so was not there but to come back.

I did about an hour later; the so and so gent was there.

I announced myself and said I would like to speak about the progress of the new composite prop b/c I wanted to buy one.

So and so said he would "be right with me."

I sat on a chair doing emails for .5 hour w/o further contact from the guys in the Hartzel shirts (including so and so) who were chewing the fact w/ each other.

After that left.

I will not be back.

Ever.

_________________
- As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.

Robert D. Schulte
http://www.schultebooth.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 19:52 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8726
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
It's been the same way every year for many years.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 20:03 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3305
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Username Protected wrote:
FWIW, same thing for me at Hartzel.

I am very interested in a composite prop - Hartzel is developing one for the Bonanza crowd.

I would prefer to buy from Hartzel for a variety of reasons (as opposed to MT).

Went to their booth and was well-dressed (that should not matter).

Made an inquiry; the gent said so and so was not there but to come back.

I did about an hour later; the so and so gent was there.

I announced myself and said I would like to speak about the progress of the new composite prop b/c I wanted to buy one.

So and so said he would "be right with me."

I sat on a chair doing emails for .5 hour w/o further contact from the guys in the Hartzel shirts (including so and so) who were chewing the fact w/ each other.

After that left.

I will not be back.

Ever.


Now you know what everyone else knows....hartzel sucks...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 20:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/16
Posts: 1172
Post Likes: +1379
Location: KLBO
Aircraft: Cessna 172
Once they threw in the towel and gave up on the TTX / T240 / Corvalis, etc. that was pretty much the ball game. They’ll sell their 172s to the Flight Schools but other than that, there is no commitment and little interest in the SE market.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 20:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/03/17
Posts: 8863
Post Likes: +10626
Location: Brevard, NC
Aircraft: Lancair LNC2 - SOLD
Thanks to Burt Rutan, I made my choice between aluminum and composite construction in 1987. After finishing the kit, I have been very pleased with the performance, economy, and beauty of my fiberglass airplane. One thing I didn't consider, though, was resale value. It's a crime what Lancairs are selling for.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 22:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/09/09
Posts: 4267
Post Likes: +901
Agreed. Also, the cirrus - wow! Went back to ait in their planes three times. Incredible interiors. Makes the g36 feel very, very cheap (fit and finish).


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2019, 22:52 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20732
Post Likes: +26197
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
8 Bonanza sales this year vs. almost 400 Cirrus's. Same for Cessna's.

It would help if you use real numbers.

2018 deliveries of piston singles:

Beechcraft: 15
Cessna: 192
Cirrus: 380
Total: 771

2019 has only one quarter reported so far from GAMA:

Beechcraft: 1
Cessna: 35
Cirrus: 66
Total: 154

While Cirrus does sell more piston singles, they haven't quite reached 50% market share, and Cessna sells more piston singles than people realize.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 26 Jul 2019, 00:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/22/14
Posts: 1596
Post Likes: +1226
Location: Jacksonville (CRG) / Sebring (SEF) FL
Aircraft: '79 TN F33A
I was in the Cirrus tent today and a group of Textron employees came over to say hello to the Cirrus reps. They were asking about after party’s etc. Shortly after I stopped by a Kingair on display and the employee present was a ferry pilot not a salesman.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 26 Jul 2019, 08:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/10/09
Posts: 3868
Post Likes: +2980
Company: On the wagon
Location: Overland Park, KS (KLXT)
Aircraft: Planeless
Username Protected wrote:
the employee present was a ferry pilot not a salesman.


I'd rather talk to the ferry pilot anyway.

_________________
Stop in flyover country and have some BBQ!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 26 Jul 2019, 08:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/09/09
Posts: 4267
Post Likes: +901
The absolute worst was piper. They had zero knowledge of the plane they were sitting beside.

Mike what are the delivery numbers for piper? They don’t even show in your list, so am I to assume it’s zero??


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 26 Jul 2019, 09:19 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20732
Post Likes: +26197
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Mike what are the delivery numbers for piper? They don’t even show in your list, so am I to assume it’s zero??

Far from it. Piper is #2 or #3 in piston single deliveries typically.

2018 deliveries of piston singles:

Cirrus: 380
Cessna: 192
Piper: 134
Beechcraft: 15
Total: 1047

2019 has only one quarter reported so far from GAMA:

Cirrus: 66
Piper: 42
Cessna: 35
Beechcraft: 1
Total: 241

(My previous total numbers were US manufactured only, updated to worldwide)

Data source:

https://gama.aero/facts-and-statistics/ ... -billings/

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Plane AC Tile.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.sarasota.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.