06 Jun 2025, 15:09 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 08 May 2019, 22:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
|
|
Big question is, do you really need the NG? The most capable Pilatus is the -47. They are lighter and you're not married to Honeywell for avionics. NG panel is great, but depending on the mission, it can also be a pain.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 09 May 2019, 11:52 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8000 Post Likes: +10319 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Big question is, do you really need the NG? The most capable Pilatus is the -47. They are lighter and you're not married to Honeywell for avionics. NG panel is great, but depending on the mission, it can also be a pain. I agree, but in this case they are looking at an airplane that is a couple of years old.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 09 May 2019, 12:03 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8000 Post Likes: +10319 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My advice would be to hire a PC12 expert!  Certainly not asking because we don't know the airplane. In fact of all of the aircraft we acquire the Pilatus is the easiest in every way. The airplane itself is simple and straightforward. When compared to a King Air it is a walk in the park. The reality is that anyone with some time on their hands can become an expert on any airplane. Being an expert on the market for a certain airplane... that's a bit more challenging. We have two full time researchers, over $2000 a month in subscription services, as well as relationships with brokers and dealers going back almost twenty years. We spend a tremendous amount of time studying aircraft values and actual sold comparable information. One of the reasons we do not sell or broker airplanes is the removal of the "competition" aspect of our business. Brokers, dealers and manufacturers all share information with us freely because for all intents and purposes we are (an extension of) their customer. They know they can confidentially share information about the market, about off market airplanes that they may have coming, as well as negatives about a specific aircraft, without feeling like they are assisting a competitor. I was on the dealer / listing agent side for 13 years and never had the relationships that we have today... I was after all the competition.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 09 May 2019, 21:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Big question is, do you really need the NG? The most capable Pilatus is the -47. They are lighter and you're not married to Honeywell for avionics. NG panel is great, but depending on the mission, it can also be a pain. I agree, but in this case they are looking at an airplane that is a couple of years old.
The newer electric gear is nice and never gave us any issues. The operator I flew for (30+ airframes), the NGs were the most unreliable ones when flown often (2000+ hours a year). Almost every single AOG event was thanks to Honeywell. And we had plenty. A lot of those would've been "oh we'll just fly it" when flown Part 91, but under 135, the planes just didn't work.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 09 May 2019, 21:24 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8000 Post Likes: +10319 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The newer electric gear is nice and never gave us any issues. The operator I flew for (30+ airframes), the NGs were the most unreliable ones when flown often (2000+ hours a year). Almost every single AOG event was thanks to Honeywell. And we had plenty. A lot of those would've been "oh we'll just fly it" when flown Part 91, but under 135, the planes just didn't work. I struggle with the APEX... but apparently they have no intentions to switch to Garmin. These guys will be part 91 and more like 200 hours a year... You guys really flew 2000 hours a year? That is amazing!!!!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 10 May 2019, 00:08 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14379 Post Likes: +9509 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I struggle with the APEX... but apparently they have no intentions to switch to Garmin. These guys will be part 91 and more like 200 hours a year...
Apex is great. what do you struggle with?
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 12 May 2019, 10:00 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8000 Post Likes: +10319 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I struggle with the APEX... but apparently they have no intentions to switch to Garmin. These guys will be part 91 and more like 200 hours a year...
Apex is great. what do you struggle with?
The fact that it’s not Garmin. Nothing at all wrong with the Honeywell equipment, but I can’t find any way that it is superior to Garmin... and it cost more to operate.
If I was Pilatus it would be a G3000 and Beech would be stuck with new airplanes that can’t be upgraded to Garmin.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 12 May 2019, 21:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/13/14 Posts: 386 Post Likes: +331 Location: New Hampshire
Aircraft: PC-24
|
|
The apex was annoying to learn for the first few hours in the airplane, because there’s multiple ways to do anything and everything. Once you play around, it’s so easy. I now have about 450 hours in the NG, and I love it. The apex is so capable.
As far as the NG, once you go five blade, it’s hard to go back to the four blades. The performance increase is noticeable, and it’s so much smoother. I love the 5 blades!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 16 May 2019, 11:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/19/18 Posts: 368 Post Likes: +156
Aircraft: On the hunt...
|
|
Just as a single datapoint.... I think I heard an operator had paid about $30K for a single video card replacement in the Apex. I hasten to add I can't confirm that. Pretty scary if true even when measured in airplane bux.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 16 May 2019, 11:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13080 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just as a single datapoint.... I think I heard an operator had paid about $30K for a single video card replacement in the Apex. I hasten to add I can't confirm that. Pretty scary if true even when measured in airplane bux. Every owner is on HAPP MAPP. So..... the only way your story is true is if an owner was foolish enough not to keep his warranty going.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 16 May 2019, 12:47 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/16/10 Posts: 9007 Post Likes: +2064
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I struggle with the APEX... but apparently they have no intentions to switch to Garmin. These guys will be part 91 and more like 200 hours a year...
Saw at an NBAA show somebody puts Garmin in older PC-12's. Looked real nice. Maybe they are up to NXi's now?
_________________ Education cuts, don't heal.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Acquisition for a PC-12NG (don't tell Jason) Posted: 16 May 2019, 16:03 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8000 Post Likes: +10319 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I struggle with the APEX... but apparently they have no intentions to switch to Garmin. These guys will be part 91 and more like 200 hours a year...
Saw at an NBAA show somebody puts Garmin in older PC-12's. Looked real nice. Maybe they are up to NXi's now?
You can get G600's and 750's, Banyan has the STC but no G1000
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|