14 May 2025, 17:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 08:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jason, I get it when stopping but do you do all your preflight checks while taxiing?
There really aren't any "preflight checks" once the motor is running. The stick shaker test is done "on the role". Most everything is done before startup. Check the controls are free and clear and check that fuel flow looks good and you're done. I followed the same rule when I had my bonanza. Mag check etc. "on the role". Nothing beats up a prop more than sitting still powering up the motor.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 10:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12131 Post Likes: +3031 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Interesting points on simplicity of M600 vs TBM. When I look back on a lot of plane comparisons, I think you see planes that are "simple" are the ones which generally sell better. A few examples: - Cirrus SR22 was ahead of many others with simple avionics, and two power levers versus three.
- Diamond DA40NG now selling to fleet buys better than others. Jet-A, single lever, overall simplicity is considered a major selling point.
- PC12 vs KA-200. One engine, less to manage.
- TBM vs KA-90. One engine, less to manage
- SETP vs old piston twins. One lever versus six....
I am sure there are more. But as companies find ways to reduce the number of pilot tasks, and not sacrifice performance except in edge cases, you see the market tends to move in that direction. I know there are also examples for six fuel tanks versus four, but I cannot recall the models... Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 12:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No prop over-speed or beta test on the ground in the Pilatus? No. I use beta while taxiing.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 12:23 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 819 Post Likes: +312 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian,SuperCub
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No prop over-speed or beta test on the ground in the Pilatus? No. I use beta while taxiing. Interesting on the prop. I guess I meant testing the beta block, that it cannot go into Beta when in the air. The Meridian has a test for that.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 12:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Interesting on the prop. I guess I meant testing the beta block, that it cannot go into Beta when in the air. The Meridian has a test for that. No, there's no test for that. But I can put it in beta while flying if I want.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 13:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6060 Post Likes: +709 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
I would like to see that in the POH. Username Protected wrote: Interesting on the prop. I guess I meant testing the beta block, that it cannot go into Beta when in the air. The Meridian has a test for that. No, there's no test for that. But I can put it in beta while flying if I want.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 14:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/15/11 Posts: 2574 Post Likes: +1178 Location: Mandan, ND
Aircraft: V35
|
|
You can put a KA or 441 "over the gate" in flight. POH prohibits it. Stupid Pilot trick would allow it. And flying a 441 in manual mode approaching to land, the urge is strong to "go over the gate". 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 17:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/01/17 Posts: 64 Post Likes: +32 Location: Irvine, CA
Aircraft: DA-42-NG
|
|
I'm surprised going into beta in flight didn't cause an immediate loss of control... I love the conclusion of the report which is that it's partially a design-fault for the lack of a squat switch (interpreted / paraphrasing) to prevent beta being activated in-flight. I mean it has a gate, he had to lift it over the gate?!?! Reasons no one can drive a manual transmission anymore (everything has been idiot-proofed) Username Protected wrote: This guy decided to put the power levers into beta while in flight. It didn't work out so well for him. Fried the engines instantly. Probably not a good idea to try that... https://aviation-safety.net/database/re ... 19940201-0
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 17:52 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5720 Post Likes: +7078 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No, there's no test for that. But I can put it in beta while flying if I want. you don't want to.
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 20:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No, there's no test for that. But I can put it in beta while flying if I want. you don't want to. Obviously.....
Never knew it was up for debate?
I can also stall it and roll it over. I can also turn the motor off in flight. I can also open the door in flight if I want. How did this conversation get here?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 20:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12131 Post Likes: +3031 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Obviously.....
Never knew it was up for debate?
I can also stall it and roll it over. I can also turn the motor off in flight. I can also open the door in flight if I want. How did this conversation get here? - It started with Cirrus is stupid.
- Then went to TBM is the best thing since sliced bread. The OP obviously should have bought a Duke.
- Followed by Piper making life easier for the pilot in the M600 when compared to the TBM.
- Anyone who wants an easier pilot life is not a real pilot.
- From there went on a tangent to a TBM that porpoised on landing, somewhere. And
- then the consideration of coral reef, low prop clearance for the TBM compared to
- pretty much every other SETP. How this is not an issue for the PC12, and you
- shutdown the engine before coming to a stop to reduce prop erosion.
- Follow up question on using beta for taxi and startup on sketchy runways in the Caribbean.
- Which then migrated to beta controls, gates and squat switches.
Fairly typical for BT I think. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 21:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8670 Post Likes: +9161 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Obviously.....
Never knew it was up for debate?
I can also stall it and roll it over. I can also turn the motor off in flight. I can also open the door in flight if I want. How did this conversation get here? - It started with Cirrus is stupid.
- Then went to TBM is the best thing since sliced bread. The OP obviously should have bought a Duke.
- Followed by Piper making life easier for the pilot in the M600 when compared to the TBM.
- Anyone who wants an easier pilot life is not a real pilot.
- From there went on a tangent to a TBM that porpoised on landing, somewhere. And
- then the consideration of coral reef, low prop clearance for the TBM compared to
- pretty much every other SETP. How this is not an issue for the PC12, and you
- shutdown the engine before coming to a stop to reduce prop erosion.
- Follow up question on using beta for taxi and startup on sketchy runways in the Caribbean.
- Which then migrated to beta controls, gates and squat switches.
Fairly typical for BT I think. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper M600 vs Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Posted: 04 Sep 2018, 21:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2000 Post Likes: +2048
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Obviously.....
Never knew it was up for debate?
I can also stall it and roll it over. I can also turn the motor off in flight. I can also open the door in flight if I want. How did this conversation get here? - It started with Cirrus is stupid.
- Then went to TBM is the best thing since sliced bread. The OP obviously should have bought a Duke.
- Followed by Piper making life easier for the pilot in the M600 when compared to the TBM.
- Anyone who wants an easier pilot life is not a real pilot.
- From there went on a tangent to a TBM that porpoised on landing, somewhere. And
- then the consideration of coral reef, low prop clearance for the TBM compared to
- pretty much every other SETP. How this is not an issue for the PC12, and you
- shutdown the engine before coming to a stop to reduce prop erosion.
- Follow up question on using beta for taxi and startup on sketchy runways in the Caribbean.
- Which then migrated to beta controls, gates and squat switches.
Fairly typical for BT I think. Tim
All it’s missing is that mu2 is perfect for the mission followed by pages of rebuttals...
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|