banner
banner

15 May 2025, 19:38 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 487 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 13:48 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20005
Post Likes: +25057
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
What does a 'membership' run at WFS? Their website is full of broken links and empty pages.

$0

To apply, send email to Fuel24@wfscorp.com.

Typically, the contract fuel providers will want credit references. In some cases, they may ask for an initial deposit (hasn't happened for me, but I've heard of it). There is generally no charge to be on their program.

CAA is the only fuel contract provider that costs money, $500 per year per aircraft. I easily make that up in a year over the other contract fuel providers. CAA has expanded to a lot more airports which helps. CAA also is active on managing fees by making FBOs publish what they are charging both during bids and during operation, and writing into more recent FBO contracts that fees can't be raised during the contract term (3 years typically).

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 14:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/24/07
Posts: 1244
Post Likes: +153
Location: Akron, Ohio
Aircraft: C550 - C560
Username Protected wrote:
Mark, how does the CJ compare to the CII?


I see what you did there. It’s coming.


What are you guys seeing in your block fuel burns in the 525A? Most of our flights are 900nm range and we are seeing block usage of 150 gph at 38/39k in our 550.

Gary

Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 15:54 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20005
Post Likes: +25057
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
What are you guys seeing in your block fuel burns in the 525A? Most of our flights are 900nm range and we are seeing block usage of 150 gph at 38/39k in our 550.

FWIW, from the Cessna 525A (CJ2, not CJ2+) operations manual, it says 900 nm zero wind ISA, using "normal cruise thrust" at MGTOW (12,375 lbs), FL390, is 2312 lbs fuel, 2:59 flight time. Works out to 116 GPH block, 302 knots block.

If you fly it at max thrust, block is 137 GPH, 333 knots.

If you fly it at long range cruise, block is 103 GPH, 284 knots.

In real life, with vectoring, approaches, more headwind than tailwind,numbers will be worse.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 17:42 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/09/13
Posts: 241
Post Likes: +150
Location: KICT/KFFZ/KLAS
Aircraft: CE25B+/CE25C/DA40
Username Protected wrote:

What are you guys seeing in your block fuel burns in the 525A? Most of our flights are 900nm range and we are seeing block usage of 150 gph at 38/39k in our 550.

Gary


We plan 1100 first hour and 700 second hour (FL410) on the M2's. Basically a CJ1.

Interestingly the CJ3+ runs almost the exact same fuel flow numbers on faster climb, faster cruise and 450 vs. 410.

Andrew.


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 17:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/09/13
Posts: 241
Post Likes: +150
Location: KICT/KFFZ/KLAS
Aircraft: CE25B+/CE25C/DA40
Username Protected wrote:
Love Captain Vanderburgh. Since I sent this video specifically in response to a point you made re automation I think you know that I believe it is relevant to all aspects of flying.

The thing I chuckle at is the attitude of some 121 guys have about what is essentially a part 91 thread. Case in point...your whole demeanor changed re John L once you learned he has 121 experience. Much less condescending imo. Think about that.

In the last few weeks it has been 1) SP jets are not wise 2) why do you fly at 450 where it so risky?3) why would you use an iPad in a automated cockpit etc etc. it would be like me on a 121 board saying silly stuff because I didn’t get the differences between 91 and 121.

In contract flying we have occasion to have some retired 121 guys sit right seat. Enjoy the people, enjoy the stories. :bow:

What I have taken away from this experience is generally they are good stick and rudder guys who are used to the massive support systems of the airlines. Things they struggle with 1) flight planning. 2) filing 3) performance planning 4) fueling. Had once 747 guy ask me when I said “have them top it. With Prist” he asked if i really wanted 100% prist? How is that thought even possible? Welp because you had support system that did it for you. 5) you generally don’t do ice, coffee, papers or bags. I have had 121 guys just walk off the ship and straight to their cars while the lessee just stands their waiting for bags.

This seems to broadly be the case with 121retirees. Get a bunch of corporate pilots drunk and they will have you in laughing to the point of tears with similar stories.

It’s all good. Respect your service and knowledge. Feel free to share your biases. I get it. Just don’t ever expect me to dogmatically accept what you are peddling just because of you flew 121 for 30 years. It is a wonderful accomplishment to be sure. But it is so much different than what we do here. And to the extent you don’t understand something (like flight at 450 or ipads) i would word it as a question and try to be less judgmental. But that’s just me.


I rarely have the heart to say this but it's painfully true.

I fly 135 (prior 91) and the retired 121 guys really do struggle with managing the flight/airplane. Not calling ahead, landing at airports with closed FBO's, Not securing paperwork for intl flights (our company makes this extremely easy too). Goofing the fuel planning (landing below min fuel multiple times) and frankly just really poor people skills. Watching some of them interact with pax is like nails on a chalkboard.

Approaching 91/135 pilots with a condescending tone is a rough equivalent to how .mil pilots look down on airline pilots. It's an eye rolling experience.


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8247
Post Likes: +10418
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
So Mark, do you think what the AAL instructor said is not relevant to Part 91 flying? He was addressing the flying pilot's interaction with automation. Most 121 guys were 91 and many fly both.[/quote]


Love Captain Vanderburgh. Since I sent this video specifically in response to a point you made re automation I think you know that I believe it is relevant to all aspects of flying.

The thing I chuckle at is the attitude of some 121 guys have about what is essentially a part 91 thread. Case in point...your whole demeanor changed re John L once you learned he has 121 experience. Much less condescending imo. Think about that.

In the last few weeks it has been 1) SP jets are not wise 2) why do you fly at 450 where it so risky?3) why would you use an iPad in a automated cockpit etc etc. it would be like me on a 121 board saying silly stuff because I didn’t get the differences between 91 and 121.

In contract flying we have occasion to have some retired 121 guys sit right seat. Enjoy the people, enjoy the stories. :bow:

What I have taken away from this experience is generally they are good stick and rudder guys who are used to the massive support systems of the airlines. Things they struggle with 1) flight planning. 2) filing 3) performance planning 4) fueling. Had once 747 guy ask me when I said “have them top it. With Prist” he asked if i really wanted 100% prist? How is that thought even possible? Welp because you had support system that did it for you. 5) you generally don’t do ice, coffee, papers or bags. I have had 121 guys just walk off the ship and straight to their cars while the lessee just stands their waiting for bags.

This seems to broadly be the case with 121retirees. Get a bunch of corporate pilots drunk and they will have you in laughing to the point of tears with similar stories.

It’s all good. Respect your service and knowledge. Feel free to share your biases. I get it. Just don’t ever expect me to dogmatically accept what you are peddling just because of you flew 121 for 30 years. It is a wonderful accomplishment to be sure. But it is so much different than what we do here. And to the extent you don’t understand something (like flight at 450 or ipads) i would word it as a question and try to be less judgmental. But that’s just me.[/quote

______________________________________________________________________

My view of John and his first 60 hours in the jet changed not because he is prior 121, it's because this isn't his first rodeo in flying a jet , and everything that goes with that environment. From what I was seeing he progressed from a King Air into his first jet. If there was some statement indicating otherwise, I missed it, sorry.

The video you provided could have been a class given to Part 91, Part 135, or part 121. It was only about flying the plane, not about dispatch, FBO's, rental cars, or catering or handling passengers bags; it was about flying airplanes and managing the automation. If you didn't get anything constructive from it , and saw it as for "those 121 guys", you need to examine your attitude and realize that airplanes are airplanes and pilots are pilots, no matter what label put on them.

"Oh we fly Part 91, so we fly planes differently." Is that it? Go back and critique your video of your Las Vegas arrival and tell me that's how it's supposed to be done Part 91. Your 121 right seater was trying to give you a hint about the cross wind and save you some fuel in a go around/missed approach.


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:29 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3303
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
I did not want to add to this but....a current intl wide body captain friend of mine asked me with a straight face how I knew how much fuel to upload on my long flights.

I was speechless really as I processed what he was asking.


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/29/14
Posts: 3002
Post Likes: +3086
Location: CEA3
Aircraft: PA24-260, C340 Ram 7
Username Protected wrote:
Paul I did get to fly the 74 once. I was jump seating on flying tigers from JFK back to ORD when I had just started at T-way (sitting sideways in the 72'). We got to 3000' and the Captain (Harold Bemis) said "John' how'd you like to fly us to Chicago?", I said hell yes and he went in back and took a nap. I hand flew that puppy-dog all the way (rocking back and forth the whole time). Big moment for me, I sent Hal a Christmas card for many years after that.


Check for dyslexia, as most of us call them 47’s and 27’s!

Murray


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:34 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/09/13
Posts: 241
Post Likes: +150
Location: KICT/KFFZ/KLAS
Aircraft: CE25B+/CE25C/DA40
Username Protected wrote:
I did not want to add to this but....a current intl wide body captain friend of mine asked me with a straight face how I knew how much fuel to upload on my long flights.

I was speechless really as I processed what he was asking.


You call dispatch right?

If there is weather you walk down to the fuel truck "give me an extra 500" :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7297
Post Likes: +4793
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Quote:
"Oh we fly Part 91, so we fly planes differently." Is that it? Go back and critique your video of your Las Vegas arrival and tell me that's how it's supposed to be done Part 91. Your 121 right seater was trying to give you a hint about the cross wind and save you some fuel in a go around/missed approach.

I don't think that was his point at all. I think his point is that anything outside of flying the airplane is where 121 guys tend to fall flat. And flying by GA involves a lot of management of things outside flying the airplane.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:46 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3303
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Username Protected wrote:
I did not want to add to this but....a current intl wide body captain friend of mine asked me with a straight face how I knew how much fuel to upload on my long flights.

I was speechless really as I processed what he was asking.


You call dispatch right?

If there is weather you walk down to the fuel truck "give me an extra 500" :D



Actually...I guess! :lol: :D Is what I should have said anyway.

Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8247
Post Likes: +10418
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
I did not want to add to this but....a current intl wide body captain friend of mine asked me with a straight face how I knew how much fuel to upload on my long flights.

I was speechless really as I processed what he was asking.


That was a pretty broad question, hard to tell what he was getting at. From his perspective (long oceanic flights) he has to consider all of the international fuel reserves , 2 or 3 different ETP's, re-release flight plans, alternate altitudes with commensurate differences in fuel burns, and calculate that into a "required fuel". Maybe he assumed you did all that too, but he might have meant how did you do it.

From his operation the answer is simple; he doesn't do it, a super computer does, and if you are factoring all of those contingencies into your required fuel , I'm quite certain a computer does that too, unless you have a lot of time to take all of the weather data and aircraft performance charts to calculate the ETP's, burns, etc. :D

So Erwin, now you have me curious too; how do you know how much fuel to upload on long flights? :D I'm guessing that your long flights are not like his long flights. ;)


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 18:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8247
Post Likes: +10418
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
"Oh we fly Part 91, so we fly planes differently." Is that it? Go back and critique your video of your Las Vegas arrival and tell me that's how it's supposed to be done Part 91. Your 121 right seater was trying to give you a hint about the cross wind and save you some fuel in a go around/missed approach.

I don't think that was his point at all. I think his point is that anything outside of flying the airplane is where 121 guys tend to fall flat. And flying by GA involves a lot of management of things outside flying the airplane.


I would agree with that Jon, but like any class we consider, there are individual differences. Some 121 guys were accomplished corporate or charter pilots at one time who know the drill.


Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 19:05 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3303
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Username Protected wrote:
I did not want to add to this but....a current intl wide body captain friend of mine asked me with a straight face how I knew how much fuel to upload on my long flights.

I was speechless really as I processed what he was asking.


That was a pretty broad question, hard to tell what he was getting at. From his perspective (long oceanic flights) he has to consider all of the international fuel reserves , 2 or 3 different ETP's, re-release flight plans, alternate altitudes with commensurate differences in fuel burns, and calculate that into a "required fuel". Maybe he assumed you did all that too, but he might have meant how did you do it.

From his operation the answer is simple; he doesn't do it, a super computer does, and if you are factoring all of those contingencies into your required fuel , I'm quite certain a computer does that too, unless you have a lot of time to take all of the weather data and aircraft performance charts to calculate the ETP's, burns, etc. :D

So Erwin, now you have me curious too; how do you know how much fuel to upload on long flights? :D I'm guessing that your long flights are not like his long flights. ;)



<me be a slow learner but not that slow>

I guess! :) :lol:

Top

 Post subject: Re: My first 60 hours in a CJ2
PostPosted: 29 May 2018, 19:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8247
Post Likes: +10418
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
I did not want to add to this but....a current intl wide body captain friend of mine asked me with a straight face how I knew how much fuel to upload on my long flights.

I was speechless really as I processed what he was asking.


You call dispatch right?

If there is weather you walk down to the fuel truck "give me an extra 500" :D


Yeah that works, you put on enough to make you comfortable. Airlines are controlled by bean counters. They know how much it costs the airline to tanker a few extra thousands of pounds of fuel per hour.

They don't give the captain a lot of leeway in adding extra fuel beyond what the flight plan calls for that meets all of the requirements for required fuel; some, but not a lot. And if a pilot develops a history of tankering excess fuel , he'll probably have a sit down with the chief pilot. In freight operations, bumping payload for extra fuel for mom and the kids doesn't go over very well. All of the flights log pages are reviewed in the head shed.

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 487 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33  Next



Aviation Fabricators (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.CiESVer2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.