15 May 2025, 16:08 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 02 May 2018, 14:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/16/10 Posts: 2023 Post Likes: +899 Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
|
|
I know. I like pic'n on the less fortunate that have to put up with the BS in that far off place that I like to visit but would hate live in.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 02 May 2018, 14:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7297 Post Likes: +4793 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I know. I like pic'n on the less fortunate that have to put up with the BS in that far off place that I like to visit but would hate live in. Every location has its upsides and downsides. I will admit that ease of building a hangar is not one of this area’s upsides. But there are other upsides. 
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 02 May 2018, 18:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/20/15 Posts: 642 Post Likes: +361 Location: KFAT
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This seems to be a somewhat regional phenomenon. I too fly VFR for short trips a decent amount. But the big IFR departure delay doesn't happen here (SFO region) too often, though it does occasionally. Maybe not from KSQL, but at KRHV, we are the redheaded stepchild for KSJC. We can't depart IFR unless there is a break in the approaches to KSJC (and they won't make that break for us). I have waited on the ground for 45 minutes waiting. This is the norm, not the exception. If the bases are high enough, I will file IFR from a fix outside the bay area, depart VFR and pick up IFR from that fix. I watched a Pilatus in front of me wait 40 minutes to get out. What do those things burn on the ground? Vince
IFR departures from SQL are silly. Takes the poor ground controller 40 minutes just to spell out the whole clearance, not to mention waiting for a window to leave. Why there is no DP, I do not know.
SMO is another pain getting IFR release.
And if Pilatus' -67B/-67P is similar to -67A, high idle is 32 gph. Low idle ~22gph. I hope to goodness they're not idling at 300 lbs/hr
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 02 May 2018, 19:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
|
|
Username Protected wrote: IFR departures from SQL are silly. Takes the poor ground controller 40 minutes just to spell out the whole clearance, not to mention waiting for a window to leave. Why there is no DP, I do not know.
SMO is another pain getting IFR release.
And if Pilatus' -67B/-67P is similar to -67A, high idle is 32 gph. Low idle ~22gph. I hope to goodness they're not idling at 300 lbs/hr PC12 fuel burn in ground idle is around 250-255lbs/hr. This with ECS on, running AC and that usual jazz.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 02 May 2018, 20:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7297 Post Likes: +4793 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: IFR departures from SQL are silly. Takes the poor ground controller 40 minutes just to spell out the whole clearance, not to mention waiting for a window to leave. Why there is no DP, I do not know.
The clearance does seem like a mouthful until you’ve heard it a few dozen times. It can be conceptually boiled down to: - Fly right traffic off Rwy 30 - don’t bust the class B Surface area - stay below 1100’ in the downwind until you are abeam the 30 numbers (aka “don’t bust the class B above the airport”) - then climb to 2000’ (sometimes 2100) and you’ll get vectors from there. As for the departure delay, I used to get delayed some, but haven’t as much for the past couple years.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 02 May 2018, 20:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/29/13 Posts: 753 Post Likes: +540
Aircraft: C177RG, ATOS-VR
|
|
Username Protected wrote: IFR departures from SQL are silly. Takes the poor ground controller 40 minutes just to spell out the whole clearance, not to mention waiting for a window to leave. Why there is no DP, I do not know.
KRHV has a DP, but it flies directly into the Hayward approach. I asked one of the tower controllers at KRHV about it and he said he has never issued it. Vince
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 03 May 2018, 03:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 3632 Post Likes: +2291 Location: $ilicon Vall€y
Aircraft: Columbia 400
|
|
Username Protected wrote: IFR departures from SQL are silly. Takes the poor ground controller 40 minutes just to spell out the whole clearance, not to mention waiting for a window to leave. Why there is no DP, I do not know.
KRHV has a DP, but it flies directly into the Hayward approach. I asked one of the tower controllers at KRHV about it and he said he has never issued it. Vince
In all the years I've been flying there, I've never gotten nor heard it in any clearance given.
It's pretty much always radar vectors to SJC, climb 3000, direct SUNOL or what not.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 04 May 2018, 11:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/08/11 Posts: 919 Post Likes: +1279 Location: California
Aircraft: C182 B350
|
|
Quote: SMO is another pain getting IFR release. Never surprising. What actually shocked the daylights out of me a few weeks ago was: I was about #6 in line for departure off 24R at LAX, and tower says "gonna be a few more minutes, guys, we have to hold up for a departure out of Santa Monica!" Fortunately, I had time to recover before flying.
_________________ NOT FOR NAVIGATIONAL USE
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 08 May 2018, 04:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/12 Posts: 610 Post Likes: +279 Location: London
Aircraft: TC690A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Quote: SMO is another pain getting IFR release. Never surprising. What actually shocked the daylights out of me a few weeks ago was: I was about #6 in line for departure off 24R at LAX, and tower says "gonna be a few more minutes, guys, we have to hold up for a departure out of Santa Monica!" Fortunately, I had time to recover before flying. Was there a TFR activated? VIP transport might have been the cause. During June Gloom working on my IR at American Flyers, I had more than a few 20-40 minute waits at the hold short line at SMO, with the meter running... it was very annoying.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 09 May 2018, 00:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3032 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My take on it after the demo.
Cons:
1. Cockpit not comfortable for a tall guy. 2. Hard to get into the crew seats. 3. I don't think I can sit up front for long. CJ3+ fixes 1 & 3.
_________________ Allen
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 09 May 2018, 09:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/06/13 Posts: 158 Post Likes: +63 Location: UK
Aircraft: C90XP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 1. Cockpit not comfortable for a tall guy. 2. Hard to get into the crew seats. 3. I don't think I can sit up front for long. I'm 6'3.5". There's some variation in the 2-3 M2 cockpits I've sat in. On a Cessna demo M2 on the ground, I could barely get in to the co-pilot seat and found the bottom edge of the panel digging into my shins. It was awful and I could not have flown it around the circuit let alone on a proper flight. The seat was fully adjusted and back. On a friend's M2, I was comfortable in the copilot seat for 4hrs in a day and entry/exit was OK. I don't know exactly what the variation is, but worth looking into. I am sure there are M2 cockpits a 6' 2-4# person can be reasonably comfortable in.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 09 May 2018, 11:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/17/12 Posts: 170 Post Likes: +117 Location: Des Moines, IA
Aircraft: CE-525
|
|
For the pilot seat a full size beverage center with a coffee dispenser reduces seat recline a good bit. The scalloped one without the coffee dispenser helps. For the copilot seat removing the AFM shelf adds a couple inches of seat track travel.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 09 May 2018, 12:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/31/14 Posts: 548 Post Likes: +261
Aircraft: eclipse
|
|
In the Eclipse the seat rails go from front to back.
So you slide the seat back until you fit.
I feature I have in my new plane is for the copilot seat to slide back 3 feet it makes it a breeze for my 92 year old dad to get in the plane.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation M2 - good entry level jet? Posted: 09 May 2018, 13:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20005 Post Likes: +25057 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I feature I have in my new plane is for the copilot seat to slide back 3 feet it makes it a breeze for my 92 year old dad to get in the plane. Ease of entry and egress for older folks is definitely an issue to consider. I put no weight on that when I bought my current plane, but I was fortunate that it is actually exceedingly good in this area. My next plane will not be as good, alas, for either passengers or crew. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|