27 Apr 2024, 12:38 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 20:38 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6790 Post Likes: +4539 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But......with everything there is a downside. Like exhaust spraying onto wing/spar or the turbo version having a reputation for cracking or falling off and spraying exhaust onto spar. Like all brands, a pre-purchase inspection by a knowledgeable examiner is important when you want to buy one. There are many of these planes flying today that have never had spar corrosion, even the oldest ones (from the 50s and early 60s) that had the over-the-wing exhaust, which seemed to be a cause of the problem on some ...and that was moved to under-the-wing in 1964. The TurbChar planes have an AD on their exhaust that leads to replacement every so many years to avoid those corrosion issues. These are remarkable old birds that I think are a joy to fly. When you own one, you should try to find an A&P to be its primary caregiver who really knows the model.
That is an area where the bonanza wins out. I have exactly one recurring AD on my bonanza.
They should have just attached an exhaust extender and been done with it. That would have cost about 0.6 knots.
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 20:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/30/10 Posts: 4263 Post Likes: +3718 Company: Flagstaff-Williams Dev. LLC Location: KCMR
Aircraft: 1965 310J
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I owned a J-35. Now I own a C-310G. Love them both. The way the 310 sits I feel like I'm in a King Air on the ground. It is a bit roll-heavy in the air, but not compared to other Cessnas. Agreed. The "heavy" feel is no more than the 210 with one exception; Its not nose heavy and has plenty of elevator trim. The ailerons are a bit heavier, but thats due to 300# on each tip. The dutch roll is apparent but that's just trainable. For me its speed and economy are surprising. 185+ kts on 20 gph (>10mpg) and hauls a lot. On landing its much less susceptible to gusts and is more stable in the flare than my old 210. Greasers come quickly with experience. The 2bladed props are louder, but cheaper to own/replace. It would be nice to have modern 3 blades .
_________________ All my friends are here. I know this because all my enemies are dead. :)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 02:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/02/08 Posts: 7245 Post Likes: +5155 Company: Rusnak Auto Group Location: Newport Coast, CA
Aircraft: Baron B55 N7123N
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But the cost of care and feeding stops me cold. Kinda like a SoCal trophy wife I suspect.
George The 310 is much less expensive to own and to liquidate when the time comes. It is also very happy when you are opening the hangar and ready to take her out flying. SoCal trophy wife - most likely not!
_________________ STAND UP FOR YOUR COUNTRY
Sven
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 08:09 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/05/11 Posts: 314 Post Likes: +226
Aircraft: 1969 Aerostar 600,
|
|
Attachment: CgNP7+IpS+6IdjJ31M10sw.jpg Attachment: GKFMSlS0Qkezj6NPwZtgEw.jpg If you like to fly with two fingers... If you think you're flying a sports car in a V35B, wait'll you fly this.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 10:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/15/11 Posts: 4392 Post Likes: +469 Location: Owensboro, KY (KOWB)
Aircraft: 1957 Bonanza H35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I owned a J-35. Now I own a C-310G. Love them both. The way the 310 sits I feel like I'm in a King Air on the ground. It is a bit roll-heavy in the air, but not compared to other Cessnas. Can you post some interior pics?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 11:58 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/16/08 Posts: 742 Post Likes: +631 Location: Nevada City, CA
Aircraft: Baron 55 w/550s
|
|
I have had, in order, over 48 years, a TriPacer, 172, 182, V35 Bonanza, a Cessna 310R, a Cessna 421B and now a B55 Colemill Baron. Each has done what I wanted, and have been excellent and fun airplanes for me. They are obviously very different and I suppose that's why I changed every once in awhile. For comfort and utility, the 421 wins hands down. For optimum performance per dollar, the V35 takes the prize, and for what I want now, which is two engines and snappy performance, the B55 Colemill is terrific.
The 310, specifically addressing the OP, was an excellent IFR plane, FIKI, radar, stormscope, good autopilot, roomy, lots of baggage space. I don't agree with the heavy roll response...it was stable, easy to land, good visibility, and a huge panel with tons of stuff in it. Nice to keep a flight bag between the front seats, in the days when we needed a flight bag.
None were mistakes or bad airplanes. Well, the TriPacer taught me the value of a good preflight. :-)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 12:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/15/11 Posts: 4392 Post Likes: +469 Location: Owensboro, KY (KOWB)
Aircraft: 1957 Bonanza H35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have had, in order, over 48 years, a TriPacer, 172, 182, V35 Bonanza, a Cessna 310R, a Cessna 421B and now a B55 Colemill Baron. Each has done what I wanted, and have been excellent and fun airplanes for me. They are obviously very different and I suppose that's why I changed every once in awhile. For comfort and utility, the 421 wins hands down. For optimum performance per dollar, the V35 takes the prize, and for what I want now, which is two engines and snappy performance, the B55 Colemill is terrific.
The 310, specifically addressing the OP, was an excellent IFR plane, FIKI, radar, stormscope, good autopilot, roomy, lots of baggage space. I don't agree with the heavy roll response...it was stable, easy to land, good visibility, and a huge panel with tons of stuff in it. Nice to keep a flight bag between the front seats, in the days when we needed a flight bag.
None were mistakes or bad airplanes. Well, the TriPacer taught me the value of a good preflight. :-) What autopilot was in the 310? Are the Cesena autopilots good autopilots? Are they rate or attitude based autopilots?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 12:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/06/10 Posts: 1435 Post Likes: +707 Location: KMBO Brandon, MS
|
|
I have flown most of the model 310 series and some, but not all, of the 55 Baron series. Flew a few years for an outfit that had both a 1968 B-55 and a 1964 C-310I (like Arlen’s) and both were similarly equipped. Quality of construction generally favor the Beech products and they have somewhat more of a sports car feel. The 310, on the other hand, has a heavier control feel and seems to be bit stiff legged on landing but, nothing that a bit of experience cannot surmount. From the cockpit perspective: 310- throttles, props, & mixtures; on the Baron- props, throttles, mixtures. Also, flap and landing gear switches were placed in reverse positions. Much more shoulder and cabin room in the Cessna. In the Beech, think later 35 series Bonanza but, with two engines. Operationally, both were very similar.
The C-310I (at least the one I flew) was the fastest for the horsepower but, perhaps a bit more expensive to maintain than the Baron with the same engines. Good experience with the U-3A (USAF C-310A); it was lighter and had more of the “sports car” feel of the Barons. Overwing exhaust did make it more fatiguing on long flights; underwing exhaust definitely preferrable The models, from the G on, roomier and generally more comfortable. Canted tip tanks improved stability. The N, P and Q models were really delightful to fly, as was the R.
My choice, if I were looking, would be a really well maintained 310. (If you are looking for an older twin, do not discount the Twin Bonanza, truly a most comfortable and stabile platform.) Otherwise, from an ownership perspective, the Baron would win as there are more of them actively flying and maintenance expertise and parts are likely be easier to obtain. Both are great airplanes and both have their pluses and minuses.
These are rambling thoughts and are worth just what you paid for them.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 12:25 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/16/08 Posts: 742 Post Likes: +631 Location: Nevada City, CA
Aircraft: Baron 55 w/550s
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have had, in order, over 48 years, a TriPacer, 172, 182, V35 Bonanza, a Cessna 310R, a Cessna 421B and now a B55 Colemill Baron. Each has done what I wanted, and have been excellent and fun airplanes for me. They are obviously very different and I suppose that's why I changed every once in awhile. For comfort and utility, the 421 wins hands down. For optimum performance per dollar, the V35 takes the prize, and for what I want now, which is two engines and snappy performance, the B55 Colemill is terrific.
The 310, specifically addressing the OP, was an excellent IFR plane, FIKI, radar, stormscope, good autopilot, roomy, lots of baggage space. I don't agree with the heavy roll response...it was stable, easy to land, good visibility, and a huge panel with tons of stuff in it. Nice to keep a flight bag between the front seats, in the days when we needed a flight bag.
None were mistakes or bad airplanes. Well, the TriPacer taught me the value of a good preflight. :-) What autopilot was in the 310? Are the Cesena autopilots good autopilots? Are they rate or attitude based autopilots?
It was an FCS-810 as I recall. Worked great. I did have a trim runaway that turned out to be a trim switch wiring failure. Could have happened to any brand.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 12:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/08/12 Posts: 12587 Post Likes: +5181 Company: Mayo Clinic Location: Rochester, MN
Aircraft: Planeless in RST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just cause I can’t resist.
Skyking indeed. I was waiting for you to chime in here.....
_________________ BFR 8/18; IPC 8/18
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: How does a 310 feel? Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 14:05 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/29/13 Posts: 13589 Post Likes: +10972 Company: Easy Ice, LLC Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But the cost of care and feeding stops me cold. Kinda like a SoCal trophy wife I suspect.
George The 310 is much less expensive to own and to liquidate when the time comes. It is also very happy when you are opening the hangar and ready to take her out flying. SoCal trophy wife - most likely not!
You have no idea. The 310 is waaaaayyyyyyyy less expensive.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Mark Hangen Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson) Power of the Turbine "Jet Elite"
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|