14 Nov 2025, 12:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We haven't resolved the thread question and are hopelessly off track as usual...so, what does it cost you PC12 guys per mile for DOC's? Already been laid out several times in this thread./
I did a search. Lots of relative discussion but I haven't seen a dollar figure. Where did I miss it?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:31 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11079 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy dropped by yesterday in his new NG (135 hrs). He had 8 chairs in the back. I guess I’m slumming then, the airplanes we are working with have 8 seats total.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I did a search. Lots of relative discussion but I haven't seen a dollar figure. Where did I miss it? I've posted all of my costs and so has Penman. Chip modified his chart somewhat and it shows the PC12 already lower than what Imagined my costs to be and he refuses to add any figure to the depreciation column. Now Chip doesn't want to talk about it anymore.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not following You always focus on depreciation but totally ignore cost of capital in your "analyses". I'll go edit it to green..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy dropped by yesterday in his new NG (135 hrs). He had 8 chairs in the back. I guess I’m slumming then, the airplanes we are working with have 8 seats total. My PC12 has 11 seats.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/14/08 Posts: 42 Post Likes: +23
Aircraft: PIlatus PC-12/47
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy dropped by yesterday in his new NG (135 hrs). He had 8 chairs in the back. I guess I’m slumming then, the airplanes we are working with have 8 seats total. You can add two more (8 in cabin) and have a good sized cargo space.
Or, remove the existing rear two and add a 3 person bench for 7 total in cabin. You are left with a pretty big cargo space.
Or just keep it as is (6 in cabin) and have a really big cargo space.
Last edited on 09 Dec 2017, 18:54, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:51 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11079 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I did a search. Lots of relative discussion but I haven't seen a dollar figure. Where did I miss it? I've posted all of my costs and so has Penman. Chip modified his chart somewhat and it shows the PC12 already lower than what Imagined my costs to be and he refuses to add any figure to the depreciation column. Now Chip doesn't want to talk about it anymore.
I’m not refusing to, I just don’t have time to mess with it.
You could go purchase an ACC subscription and do it, then share your data with us.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 09 Dec 2017, 18:54 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11079 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy dropped by yesterday in his new NG (135 hrs). He had 8 chairs in the back. You can add two more or a 3 person bench. Or just keep it as is and have a huge cargo space.
Way cool. I’m not a Pilatus expert by any definition, but I hope to be someday.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 10 Dec 2017, 11:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
|
40 to 50k a year to maintain a SETP that seem like a lot!
Those number do not include the warranties for your avionics and other items which seem big jet expensive so you can’t go without. What’s that cost perhour
Then you spend 2million more for it and ignore the capital cost. Hey that’s real money!
If you fly a 120hrs a year it’s $1000.00per hour just for capital cost.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 10 Dec 2017, 11:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Define "capital cost" More properly expressed as cost of capital I define it in the traditional manner as the opportunity cost of making a specific investment or rate of return that could have been made in a different, but similar investment. Or it is the cost of the capital used to make the investment (i.e. interest rate on a loan where the investment is leveraged). I understand that you have a unique view of this issue and, at least for me, its not necessary to re-litigate here. I think that it is an important factor in analyzing the total cost of ownership of an aircraft, along with depreciation. Both of which are often ignored by those who simply don't want to know what the plane's true costs are for some reason. Everyone's cost of capital is somewhat unique. But if you assume a $1 million asset with a 5% cost of capital (equity or debt) there is a $50,000 per year cost of owning that asset attributable to the cost of capital.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 10 Dec 2017, 12:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7672 Post Likes: +5050 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Define "capital cost" For me, it is things that are directly proportional to the money tied up in the airplane. - either loan interest or investment income lost, easily 5% per year - property tax, paid on the Hull value 1% per year These two things alone for me result in every additional $1M in purchase price cost me the entire year’s worth of operating cost of my current flying. Some might arguably add actual depreciation, which is naturally going to be more dollars on a higher value airplane. A 10% drop in value on $1M is obviously more than a 10% drop on $500K. You point this out in you CJ argument. I find it harder to count as capital cost partly because it is dependent on many variables. But it is certainly large and real. For a low utilization owner/pilot, these costs overwhelm the operating costs.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|