01 Jan 2026, 04:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Oct 2017, 15:19 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 09/11/09
Posts: 6296
Post Likes: +5665
Company: Middle of the country company
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: ....they seem logical and consistent. Good Grief. Like we need another smartass in this thread. Or this site......
While I agree with the sentiment of your post, since we smartasses tend to flock together.........
.......I'm pretty sure he meant the SUMMARIES were logical and consistent, I.E., Mr. Wrights Cliffs Notes version a few posts above.....
(If I totally missed YOU being a smartass with your reply, disregard this entire post....)
_________________
Three things tell the truth:
Little kids
Drunks
Yoga pants
Actually, four things.....
Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 03 Oct 2017, 15:25 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/29/17
Posts: 6
Post Likes: +10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hi Arlen...thanks. I have to say...much like college...I took the Cliff Notes approach to this thread....did I miss anything important?
I did glance over several summaries....they seem logical and consistent. cliffs notes version: Cirrus jet is an underpowered, over-compromised design with many shortcomings, something a "real jet pilot" would never touch. And it is going to sell like hotcakes at an EAA breakfast.
I meant the summaries (throughout the 372 pages) are logical and consistent. I don't know why he cut the first part of my quote off. Sounds like a trouble maker.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 03 Oct 2017, 15:51 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/11/09
Posts: 6296
Post Likes: +5665
Company: Middle of the country company
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hi Stanley. Maybe I should have used the green font! Welcome to BT! Dang, I did miss it, didn't I........ 
_________________
Three things tell the truth:
Little kids
Drunks
Yoga pants
Actually, four things.....
Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 03 Oct 2017, 15:55 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12201
Post Likes: +3086
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I meant the summaries (throughout the 372 pages) are logical and consistent. I don't know why he cut the first part of my quote off. Sounds like a trouble maker. There are a number of trouble makers on this forum. A few examples: Jason C. like to throw in bomb shells of thought which a lot of people are not ready for. Mike C. likes to over analyze everything from an engineering perspective and assumes all people are just as rational. Adam S. thinks the world should go electric so he can have cheap avgas. Michael P. thinks anything smaller then the PC12 is a waste of time. And the only real car is a Tesla. I am sure there is more...  Tim (the nice sweet, innocent guy in the corner)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 03 Oct 2017, 15:57 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/11/09
Posts: 6296
Post Likes: +5665
Company: Middle of the country company
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I meant the summaries (throughout the 372 pages) are logical and consistent. I don't know why he cut the first part of my quote off. Sounds like a trouble maker. There are a number of trouble makers on this forum. A few examples: Jason C. like to throw in bomb shells of thought which a lot of people are not ready for. Mike C. likes to over analyze everything from an engineering perspective and assumes all people are just as rational. Adam S. thinks the world should go electric so he can have cheap avgas. Michael P. thinks anything smaller then the PC12 is a waste of time. And the only real car is a Tesla. I am sure there is more... Tim (the nice sweet, innocent guy in the corner)
Now that is a pretty accurate summary, based on forum posts........except for that sign-off statement.... 
_________________
Three things tell the truth:
Little kids
Drunks
Yoga pants
Actually, four things.....
Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 03 Oct 2017, 18:03 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Michael P. thinks anything smaller then the PC12 is a waste of time. And the only real car is a Tesla.
Now listen up buttercup!!!!! I still have my Mooney (love that airplane) and have a Suburban (no frigging Lyft/Uber here) now in the mountains......... but........ PC12 is still what is needed for hauling my litter SAFELY and by golly, Tesla is still the finest ride on the planet........ carry on......
_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 04 Oct 2017, 00:50 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 934
Post Likes: +475
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: And the only real car is a Tesla. Finally a true fact in this thread. Andrew
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 Oct 2017, 10:34 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20980
Post Likes: +26460
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Seriously. What the heck is the purpose of that? Keep left/right fuel load in balance to the point roll trim is not required. 2 minutes could be 15 lbs of fuel. 15 lbs is enough that I think one will notice in the trim, though it would not be overly strong. Easiest solution is to add a second engine to draw fuel evenly from both tanks. :-) Mike C.
_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 Oct 2017, 11:35 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1810
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Seriously. What the heck is the purpose of that? Keep left/right fuel load in balance to the point roll trim is not required. 2 minutes could be 15 lbs of fuel. 15 lbs is enough that I think one will notice in the trim, though it would not be overly strong. Easiest solution is to add a second engine to draw fuel evenly from both tanks. :-) Mike C.
True but you'd have to mount it on the belly or on top of the other one..... 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 Oct 2017, 11:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1810
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Seriously. What the heck is the purpose of that? Keep left/right fuel load in balance to the point roll trim is not required. 2 minutes could be 15 lbs of fuel. 15 lbs is enough that I think one will notice in the trim, though it would not be overly strong. Easiest solution is to add a second engine to draw fuel evenly from both tanks. :-) Mike C.
In all seriousness, seems like the wing tanks should be pressurized off bleed air and feed a smaller center tank that's always full. the engine would draw fuel only from the center tank. No switching and fairly automatic.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|
